Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
JerryL said:I'm not sure which passages in the Quran forbid this... any help?
That's along the lines of what I'm looking for. Where in the Quran is it?God, in the Quran, describes oppression as "worse than murder."
Prostitution is its own critter. There may be a rape involved, but I'm interested in condemnation of rape itself.God in the Quran also did not save the words to condemn prostitution, especially when oppression and forcing the young girls is a factor and this makes it different than a prostitution practiced by consenting adults, and it would place it in the category of rape.
This is how a muslim must have sex "only in marriage"JerryL said:The quotes seem to tell muslisms not to have sex. I'm not sure I see the prohibition against rape.
That's along the lines of what I'm looking for. Where in the Quran is it?
Prostitution is its own critter. There may be a rape involved, but I'm interested in condemnation of rape itself.
I know that the Bible has no such prohibition, I'm looking to see if the Quran fixes that or not. Could you cite the passage you alluded to saying rape was worse than murder?
God rules is much higher and accurate than what human beings may come up with.JerryL said:But were these punishments for rape or for illicit sex?
Can you give me an example of someone being punished for raping their wife? I'm not clear from the site or your passages that rape is disallowed. (though I can see that the "don't harm people" rule might include this, but I'm looking for a more specific prohibition).
It is quite difficult to rape someone without having sex.JerryL said:The quotes seem to tell muslisms not to have sex. I'm not sure I see the prohibition against rape.
In religion, this is a very new concept, and is not fair to attack Islam or Christianity for this. Remember that in the original marriage vows, women swore an oath before God that they would obey their husbands and completely honour them with their bodies. A literal interpretation of this sacred oath would mean that rape within marriage would be impossible, as the woman would have no right to refuse anything.JerryL said:Can you give me an example of someone being punished for raping their wife?
Aren't these books suppose to be timeless, so it should make no difference when any act is taking place there should be a specific verse somewhere to cover it. Oh yeah you can interpret almost any verse to mean what you want it to. These books are not timeless they speak of an ancient people in an ancient time with ancient views knowing nothing of the world we know today and the things we know. They are just old story books and not even well written.Merlin said:In religion, this is a very new concept, and is not fair to attack Islam or Christianity for this. Remember that in the original marriage vows, women swore an oath before God that they would obey their husbands and completely honour them with their bodies. A literal interpretation of this sacred oath would mean that rape within marriage would be impossible, as the woman would have no right to refuse anything.
In the modern world it is different. Very few women swear that oath, and neither should they. This means that they have not promised to be totally submissive, and therefore they have the right to refuse anything. These new rules were imposed a long time after the Bible and the Qu'ran were finalised. So it is impossible to expect them to include a prohibition on rape within marriage, when it was technically impossible in those days.
Exactly, and as Merlin is also implying, rape is a new subject in religion because back in the old days, women had very few rights as actual human beings (which is still a trend in predominantly muslim societies). It's not surprising of the Quran to reflect this.Radar said:Aren't these books suppose to be timeless, so it should make no difference when any act is taking place there should be a specific verse somewhere to cover it. Oh yeah you can interpret almost any verse to mean what you want it to. These books are not timeless they speak of an ancient people in an ancient time with ancient views knowing nothing of the world we know today and the things we know. They are just old story books and not even well written.
Isn't this equally obvious for murder? I'll bet that the Quran has a specific and spelled-out prohibition on murder.The Truth said:For rape there is no such a thing in Quran called: Don't rape women because it's obvious for everybody and even before Islam people were not allowing it.
Only some sex is illegal... hence why I asked about spousal rape.It is quite difficult to rape someone without having sex.
Which one did God want? Did God want you to force yourself on your wife against her will? Support your answer.In religion, this is a very new concept, and is not fair to attack Islam or Christianity for this. Remember that in the original marriage vows, women swore an oath before God that they would obey their husbands and completely honour them with their bodies. A literal interpretation of this sacred oath would mean that rape within marriage would be impossible, as the woman would have no right to refuse anything.
I hope that you didn't ASSUME what you are just saying but you really read the whole "story book" as you rename it.Radar said:These books are not timeless they speak of an ancient people in an ancient time with ancient views knowing nothing of the world we know today and the things we know. They are just old story books and not even well written.
I found that before I ever opened this thread.flysky said:This is a long subject so I would recommend you to visit
http://www.submission.org/women/rape.html
If you have any questions after reading that article go to http://askmuslims.com and post in their forums or e-mail them, they are quick in answering your questions.
I read this...it has the same points The Truth mentioned--lots of talk about "chastity", and not forcing girls to become "prostitutes", but again, no specifics about rape. For instance, "[5:5] .. You shall maintain CHASTITY, not committing adultery, nor taking secret lovers. Anyone who rejects faith, all his work will be in vain, and in the Hereafter he will be with the losers. " Adultery and secret lovers are not necessarily rape.flysky said:This is a long subject so I would recommend you to visit
http://www.submission.org/women/rape.html
But the clues are all in there to find.Radar said:Aren't these books suppose to be timeless, so it should make no difference when any act is taking place there should be a specific verse somewhere to cover it. Oh yeah you can interpret almost any verse to mean what you want it to. These books are not timeless they speak of an ancient people in an ancient time with ancient views knowing nothing of the world we know today and the things we know. They are just old story books and not even well written.
Are you trying to find a religion that will permit you to do it. If not, why this obsession with rape?Faint said:I read this...it has the same points The Truth mentioned--lots of talk about "chastity", and not forcing girls to become "prostitutes", but again, no specifics about rape. For instance, "[5:5] .. You shall maintain CHASTITY, not committing adultery, nor taking secret lovers. Anyone who rejects faith, all his work will be in vain, and in the Hereafter he will be with the losers. " Adultery and secret lovers are not necessarily rape.
inheret = rape?Relevant verses from the Quran:
Sûrah an Nâs 4.119
'O you who believe! You are forbidden to inherit women against their will...'
I'm a little unclear. Does this mean it's OK to coerce yor slaves into whoredom if they are not desirous of marriage?Sûrah an Nûr 24.33
'... And do not, in order to gain some of the fleeting pleasures of this worldly life, coerce your slave women into whoredom if they are desirous of marriage, and if anyone should coerce them, then, verily, after they have been compelled (to submit in their helplessness), God will be much forgiving, a dispenser of grace (to them).
No, it means 'don't do it yourself, but if anyone else does, and they were helpless, then THEY will not be condemned for it'. i.e It will not be a sin against them, just against the perpetrator.JerryL said:inheret = rape?
I'm a little unclear. Does this mean it's OK to coerce yor slaves into whoredom if they are not desirous of marriage?