No.They have faith in doubt. Right? Please
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No.They have faith in doubt. Right? Please
They have faith in doubt. Right? Please
Regards
They have faith in doubt. Right? Please
Regards
They have faith in doubt. Right? Please
Regards
My agreeing or disagreeing with it has no bearing on what some people do with it.To me, "God" is a name for some gods... kind of like how some people will call their cat "Cat".
I don't know of anyone that named their atheism "Atheism". It seems like an absurd idea.
Faith in doubt? I don't follow.
I can imagine a scenario where you put faith into your doubts about something, but I don't see how to tie it to atheism.
But I'm a hard atheist anyways, so...
Faith in doubt?
Sorry mate, you've lost me.
Just don't follow any form of theistic belief is all.
And there-in lies a big part of the problem.Because "god" itself is such a vague concept.
I prefer knowledge and certainty (or as near certain as possible). I don't have faith in doubt because I know it exists, I have come across doubt so I don't need faith to 'believe' in it. I am certain doubt exists. Faith has nothing to do with it.They have faith in doubt. Right? Please
Regards
Atheism is the religion of the Atheism peoples. Right? Please.What do you think "Atheism" means? AFAIK, it's nothing but a typo for "atheism".
They have faith in doubt. Right? Please
Regards
No. Those atheists who are religious have their own religions. For instance, a non-theistic Buddhist's religion isn't "Atheism"; it's Buddhism.Atheism is the religion of the Atheism peoples. Right? Please.
Regards.
I doubt it.They have faith in doubt. Right?
Faith in doubt, no. Objectively, doubt is a good thing which everyone, including the religious, use. For example, religious people might doubt that evolution is fact or that the cosmos could have come about without a creator.They have faith in doubt. Right? Please
Regards
Speaking for myself, I have "faith" that the well being of conscious creatures (WBCC), (a phrase of Sam Harris's), is a "good" thing to pursue. I can't prove that WBCC is good, but I have faith that it is.
I think that the only people who don't have some sort of underlying faith statement like mine are the moral relativists, and there aren't that many of those.
I doubt that your assertion has any merit. Right? PleaseThey have faith in doubt. Right? Please
Regards
I am guessing that it has to do with those atheists who faith that god does not exist.I really don't understand why some feel the need to attach "faith" or "religion" to Atheism or atheism......
Wait: are you working from some general idea that capitalization implies religion?
Why wouod a conviction necessarily be a "religious" conviction?
Frankly, I think there's a common tactic among sone people to label atheists as "religious" just to get a rise out of them.
Being passionate or feeling certain aren't enough to make a point of view a religion.
Why would you think the similarities between theists and atheists boil down to atheism being a religion and not just to the fact that people - regardless of labels - have a lot in common?
And as I touched on in the other thread, I think that part of the similarity between theists and atheists comes down to the fact that theists often don't actually live as if they believe the things they say they do; they often live as atheists.