Artificial selection has been around for over 2000 years and has lead to the production of Useful Animals, plants and bacteria. Romans actually used it for agriculture. The domesticated animals you know today have all been artificailly selected 1000's of years ago.
Evolution(natural selection) has only been known about since Darwin 1859 only a couple of hundred of years and is a detailed explanation of how things came about. Darwin even used Artificial selection to help prove his theory. Evolution can only be used to explain how things happened. For example most people that live in an area with mosquitoes that have maleria have genes that produce Sickle cell anemia. If you didn't test for maleria or test for the genes you would know nothing. If Sickle cell anemia wasn't deadly you probably wouldn't test for it.
Being that evolution only explains how known things happened how important is it? Would we have been able to better our use of artificial selection even without the knowledge of evolution? There is some data that seems to show we were getting better with artificial selection.
Evolution(natural selection) has only been known about since Darwin 1859 only a couple of hundred of years and is a detailed explanation of how things came about. Darwin even used Artificial selection to help prove his theory. Evolution can only be used to explain how things happened. For example most people that live in an area with mosquitoes that have maleria have genes that produce Sickle cell anemia. If you didn't test for maleria or test for the genes you would know nothing. If Sickle cell anemia wasn't deadly you probably wouldn't test for it.
Being that evolution only explains how known things happened how important is it? Would we have been able to better our use of artificial selection even without the knowledge of evolution? There is some data that seems to show we were getting better with artificial selection.