• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Issue with the American Left.

Father

Devourer of Truth
Their religion is listed as a spiritual Satanist, not The Satanic Temple from which you got that quote which is considered a specific branch of "modern Satanism" aka "atheistic satanism" which is about the opposite of "spiritual Satanism" aka "theistic satanism".

Also my last post (#35) points out how you kind of don't seem to understand "survival of the fittest". It's basically "best adapted" and as Dawkins has pointed out humans are adapted for cooperation and compassion more so than most other animals.
I don't really care what Darwin believes, to be honest. he has some really wacky idea's that were proven wrong. some were not. this one is one of the ones he was right on.

like it or not survival of the fittest is just a fact of nature. its a really simplistic summarization of evolution and adaption but still pretty accurate. even to us humans with our boundless arrogance and self-centered ideas of grandeur. we are but animals like the rest.

Humans can be peace-loving hippies, yes but most the time we are fractionated tribalists who benefit off each other's misery. and the 10'000 or so years of human history sort of back my statements on the strong rule the weak. unless the weak have large numbers in which case they become strong.

see power dichotomies are weird for us
 

Father

Devourer of Truth
There are 5,000 Communists in the United States through the CPUSA and they haven't run in a Presidential election since 1988. Their peak membership was about 60,000 back in 1919 when they were founded almost 100 years ago after a world war and during a wave of revolutions accross Europe and America. They are a broken political force and it would take decades of radicalisation for them to become significant again.

And I can only agree with @Kapalika that there are significant differences within the Communist movement. Whilst not enough differences to make it attractive, they are often rife with sectarian conflicts (especially Trotskyists who have a reputation for it) and difference between the Soviets and Maoist China led to the sino-soviet split broke up the world communist movement.

Granted, however, the Alt leftists hold some very communistic view's like the alt-right hold some Nazistic views. both do not mirror images but are pieces that each group use to hold.
 

Laika

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Granted, however, the Alt leftists hold some very communistic view's like the alt-right hold some Nazistic views. both do not mirror images but are pieces that each group use to hold.

What you would describe as the "alt-left" are essentially morons. They may be very disruptive and could even pose a terrorist risk, but they are not equivalent to the existential nature of the threat of either sharing nuclear secrets with the Soviet Union (or North Korea for that matter) as espionage, as a fifth column to an invasion by a foreign power, or either as a base for an internal insurgency or popular revolution. The latter may have been conceivable in the 1920's and 30's, but it was still quite a long shot.

"Cultural Marxism" does exist, but most of those who belong to it are fervently anti-stalinist, anti-north Korea and will come out as libertarian left in the political compass. There is a danger in comparing narcissistic university students who obnoxiously regurgitate "critical theory" from sociology class with highly disciplined, motivated revolutionaries with military grade experience with fire arms that would pose an actual security risk and would be willing to institute a form of state terrorism to kill "enemies of the people". The same goes for Nazis and White Nationalists. Alot of people can "talk the talk" but few will "walk the walk" if you will.

You can legitimately debate whether having that kind of Marxian influence within society is healthy to maintain American democracy, but I think it is still important to make that distinction because of how it impacts discussions on the scope of free speech and free thought.
 

Father

Devourer of Truth
What you would describe as the "alt-left" are essentially morons. They may be very disruptive and could even pose a terrorist risk, but they are not equivalent to the existential nature of the threat of either sharing nuclear secrets with the Soviet Union (or North Korea for that matter) as espionage, as a fifth column to an invasion by a foreign power, or either as a base for an internal insurgency or popular revolution. The latter may have been conceivable in the 1920's and 30's, but it was still quite a long shot.

Morons with groups similar to the brown shirts. sure they are stupid and their ideas stupid. but it only take's one genius or a few to make a stupid set of ideals law. see the Nazi's for more details

nor of course would they be on par with the threats of old you are looking at communist gold age. look at how they rose up first.
 

proudpagan

Member
They are a broken political force and it would take decades of radicalisation for them to become significant again

Anti American Left Wing media has achieved good deal of breakthruz and steps necessary for soviet style over throw of US . Attacks on white history, attacks on the police (ESPN), attacks on males (every TV commercial) and attacks on logic and reason. Former Soviet-era deception expert Yuri Bezmenov laid out a blueprint for communist subversion of any targeted nation back in the 1980s. That blueprint looks remarkably like what Obama and the radical left just pulled off over the last eight years… with the help of the lying mainstream media and cultural subversion via movies, TV, Jon Stewart, fake news, false flags and an overthrow of the public education system
 

proudpagan

Member
It's basically "best adapted" and as Dawkins has pointed out humans are adapted for cooperation and compassion more so than most other animals.

Then why ISIL and holomodour occured ? Why did The Great Purge occur ? Why 9/11 occured ? Why in the **** is Middle East cucked up so good enh ? I dont see the ones who walk on all fours being responsible for any of these ...
 

Kuzcotopia

If you can read this, you are as lucky as I am.
Just a question, why does the Left here try to turn issues of Class into issues of race?
or sex. or gender. or hair color. really they turn every logical explainable issue into some Good and Evil argument/

things that that along with many other issues they always try to spin when the issue itself is not even an issue. it's just Class. the wealthy will always hold an advantage over the weak. thats capitalism that's nature.

it's like the right turns everything into an issue of religion or tradition. the left, issues of race and sex, together both form the most stupid self-centered group of possible insane asylum escape's I have ever seen.

thoughts?

What percentage of the left are you talking about here?

I really feel like "The Left" has become the notorious "THEY," rooted in paranoia and self-fulfilling prophecy, with little basis in fact.

We're not the monsters hiding under your bed. We're people with jobs and families and social lives like anyone else.

ITS ALL A DISTRACTION - they rather talk about these worthless personal issues than anything that results in an improvement in our living. I have better uses of my life than to talk about your preferred pronouns, identity, sexual partners, or whatever. You want to waste your time on these insignificant issues feel free, they help no one not even the people who live in these ways. :D

If you want it all to go away, write your congressman to stop proposing legislation that requires reasonable people to have to fight back against religiously motivated nonsense.

If legislation simple stops being proposed, then "Identity politics" as you call them, will fade away in your rear view mirror. I hate this fight as much as anybody. So let's fix it together, okay?

Talking about these things just means you ignore the bread and butter like jobs, money, economics, quality of living, etc... That's why the Dems crater in the elections... And, they're still cratering - they just decide to double down on the stupidity instead of evaluating what is wrong. It must be that they're not out of touch enough yet, well that's fine... I'll be laughing in the next clean sweep Presidential election and watch the Congress empty out as well as they do nothing get run over by the people that want to work for our money.

We can actually deal with more than one issue at a time. Protecting rights against terrible legislation does not mean we can't actually propose legislation of our own.

That said, you're right here. The Democratic Party has sold out economically a long time ago. Now, the left is center to center-right economically, and the right is bat-#$&t crazy proposing tax cuts that they have no plan to pay for. I would love an actual argument from a candidate that was actually economically liberal. . . Even if it isn't realistic, at least make that argument and argue for compromise. Instead, democrats start at the center, republicans start at the crazy far right, and guess what? All the actual policies are middle right wing economically. What a shock. . .

I do believe is does go a long way toward explaining your point that many with economic left leanings simply can't muster up the energy to vote. . No one of true liberal economic substance actually runs anymore. Too much money and too much compromise.

If only more on the left understood this, it would be getting somewhere. The Democrats are using "identity politics" as a substitute for talking about wider economic change, probably because they don't want to upset their donors. On healthcare, they may be addressing bread and butter issues, but otherwise I agree with you on this. there should be more important priorities for "the left" than a person's preferred pronouns or indulging the media's outrage culture.

I agree that wider economic change should be our focus. . . for most liberals, this is truly what we care about. It comes down to money, and Dems need a ton of it to run. The party compromised itself economically as a result. As we move forward, I am actually heartened by the social media's influence and Trump's election. Money mattered much less in the recent 2016 US election. He was badly outspent and still won. . . . There is a great lesson here for Dems if they choose to learn it.

I do disagree with the characterization that "the left" cares only about pronouns or outrage or whatever. That is a talking point as silly and unfounded as the liberal's supposed "War in Christmas". It's just another false characterization designed to motivate the other side against the "evil liberal".
 

Laika

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Anti American Left Wing media has achieved good deal of breakthruz and steps necessary for soviet style over throw of US . Attacks on white history, attacks on the police (ESPN), attacks on males (every TV commercial) and attacks on logic and reason. Former Soviet-era deception expert Yuri Bezmenov laid out a blueprint for communist subversion of any targeted nation back in the 1980s. That blueprint looks remarkably like what Obama and the radical left just pulled off over the last eight years… with the help of the lying mainstream media and cultural subversion via movies, TV, Jon Stewart, fake news, false flags and an overthrow of the public education system

In case anyone is wondering, Yuri Bezmenov is the guy in the video below:


Subversion does not take place in isolation as it has to have an "economic basis" (as in the Marxist view as economics determines the political and ideological superstructure). You need economic conditions in which dissent will flourish and that primarily means the decline of the American Middle Class as a source of class collaboration between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. A thriving middle class makes it in the interests of working people to support capitalism (because they benefit from it) and support "capitalist" democracy (because as they are property owners and so will more willingly support capitalist understanding of freedom, individualism, etc).

The problem for young people now is that it is not in there self-interest to support the capitalist system. They come out of university with massive debts and no hope of paying them off, social mobility is very low so they cannot advance their own self-interest in a career path, and mostly they will end up doing a very limited range of jobs because the labour market favours those who already have work experience. This does not mean it is impossible to advance in that kind of economy, but it creates the economic conditions for a generation to question the usefulness of capitalism in their lives. It favours a radicalised generation and it doesn't necessarily make much difference whether its far right or far left- both will flourish because people want a "reason" for why they aren't living up to the expectations of a consumer society they get in the stylish brochure or watching hyper-attractive people on "rags to riches" stories on TV.

A healthy capitalist economy and democratic society has the immunity to fight off extremist ideologies from left or right. But American is not currently either so the "virus" of extremism can flourish in the host country.
 

Father

Devourer of Truth
What percentage of the left are you talking about here?

I really feel like "The Left" has become the notorious "THEY," rooted in paranoia and self-fulfilling prophecy, with little basis in fact.

We're not the monsters hiding under your bed. We're people with jobs and families and social lives like anyone else.



.

Antifa. BAMN BLM. the media that supports it. Youtubes silencing campaign and Googles hiding of search results that they deem "hateful" . you know the things you would notice if you glanced over at the burning wreckage visible easily from the internet.
 

Kuzcotopia

If you can read this, you are as lucky as I am.
Antifa. BAMN BLM. the media that supports it. Youtubes silencing campaign and Googles hiding of search results that they deem "hateful" . you know the things you would notice if you glanced over at the burning wreckage visible easily from the internet.

Thanks for proving my point about the paranoia.
 

proudpagan

Member
. A thriving middle class makes it in the interests of working people to support capitalism (because they benefit from it) and support "capitalist" democracy (because as they are property owners and so will more willingly support capitalist understanding of freedom, individualism, etc)

Capitalism and communism both are dangerous for society tbh .

trickledownecomnimidsowlringforyoaussa_465_443_int.jpg

Capitalism’s role is to increase the economic pie, nothing more. And while capitalism has become remarkably responsive to what people want as individual consumers, democracies have struggled to perform their own basic functions that is to articulate and act upon the common good, and to help societies achieve both growth and equity.
 

Laika

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Capitalism and communism both are dangerous for society tbh .

trickledownecomnimidsowlringforyoaussa_465_443_int.jpg

Capitalism’s role is to increase the economic pie, nothing more. And while capitalism has become remarkably responsive to what people want as individual consumers, democracies have struggled to perform their own basic functions that is to articulate and act upon the common good, and to help societies achieve both growth and equity.

Isn't that exactly the kind of demoralisation Yuri Bezmenov talked about though? If Capitalism and Democracy are the basis of free societies and protecting the rights and dignity of the individual, they should be worth fighting for. There is as much a moral case for Capitalism as an economic one and it is usually the moral arguments that inspire people to support Capitalism or Communism because its about who we are and what we can achieve and aspire towards.
 

oldbadger

Skanky Old Mongrel!
Just a question, why does the Left here try to turn issues of Class into issues of race?
or sex. or gender. or hair color. really they turn every logical explainable issue into some Good and Evil argument/

I mean one video I watched had a bunch of black and white people stand in a line then move up two paces if the following applied to them

"parents still together" move up 2 *not a cause of society*

"Had a father figure" (self-evident to the first question) *partially a cause of society for good reason*

"Can afford college" *let's be honest we all get molested with debt once we get out*

"didn't have to help their parents pay bills" *oh come on you know that is rigged*

and of course from how rigged it is they tried focusing on the fact it was only white people stepping forward. not like the entire midwest is full of poor white people or anything. or how the south is always considered poor rural and dumb, yet of course only when it's in their favor *the left*

things that that along with many other issues they always try to spin when the issue itself is not even an issue. it's just Class. the wealthy will always hold an advantage over the weak. thats capitalism that's nature.

it seems like every issue that has an explainable or logical reason they try sewing into some racist patriarchy, mind you I still have not gotten my white privilege members card and am wondering who I can contact go get it.

it's like the right turns everything into an issue of religion or tradition. the left, issues of race and sex, together both form the most stupid self-centered group of possible insane asylum escape's I have ever seen.

thoughts?

Ha!
The Left!
Leftists!
The Right!
Rightists!
What a banal perspective of and about the views of hundreds of millions of folks.

Just now a 'Rightist' is leading the US, for instance, and I expect that the American 'left' does kind of have an issue with the American 'Right' which put him there. So don't worry about about what the 'Left' is doing just now, it's time to start wondering what the 'Right' has been thinking about.
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
education. it's not that blacks don't have access to Good education based on race.
Like your previous posts, you are taking a very complex topic and you are attempting to simplify it to fit a narrative that you want to believe. It simply isn't the case. Segregation no longer exists, of course, but there are many other factors at play that determine education, some of it is linked to the side effect of racism, some are not. I do not have the time at the moment to go into much more detail but suffice it to say that this problem is more complicated than you want it to be.
 

dawny0826

Mother Heathen
Just a question, why does the Left here try to turn issues of Class into issues of race?
or sex. or gender. or hair color. really they turn every logical explainable issue into some Good and Evil argument/

I mean one video I watched had a bunch of black and white people stand in a line then move up two paces if the following applied to them

"parents still together" move up 2 *not a cause of society*

"Had a father figure" (self-evident to the first question) *partially a cause of society for good reason*

"Can afford college" *let's be honest we all get molested with debt once we get out*

"didn't have to help their parents pay bills" *oh come on you know that is rigged*

and of course from how rigged it is they tried focusing on the fact it was only white people stepping forward. not like the entire midwest is full of poor white people or anything. or how the south is always considered poor rural and dumb, yet of course only when it's in their favor *the left*

things that that along with many other issues they always try to spin when the issue itself is not even an issue. it's just Class. the wealthy will always hold an advantage over the weak. thats capitalism that's nature.

it seems like every issue that has an explainable or logical reason they try sewing into some racist patriarchy, mind you I still have not gotten my white privilege members card and am wondering who I can contact go get it.

it's like the right turns everything into an issue of religion or tradition. the left, issues of race and sex, together both form the most stupid self-centered group of possible insane asylum escape's I have ever seen.

thoughts?

When the playing field isn't even, it's not a fair game unless implementing handicap.

Systematic racism is real. It's important to understand and acknowledge it, because it directly impacts every facet of African American lives and continues to shape the mindset of many white Americans.

I like the way systematic racism is explained here:

https://www.raceforward.org/videos/systemic-racism

I appreciate that "the left" is more apt to recognize racial disparity and its impact on everyone.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Yet unless we cease to be Human such natural law will always apply.
it's better if we learn how to use it for our own advantage than reject it and fall to it anyway.
the longest lasting empires. and largest empires like the Romans. or the British. understood it, and in turn prospered along with their people.

the natural order does take a different turn for us but it is still highly there

I'm not necessarily disagreeing with how things are, but it might reflect better on capitalists' character if they would take it like a man when "natural law" comes back to bite them. For example, if a capitalist's workers are striking and rioting, he should fight them on his own - not call out to "mommy government" to come and save him. That's weak, unmanly, and is a clear abandonment of the principles of "natural law."

You'd have a point if it was truly the case where the "strong dominate the weak," but when the so-called "strong" need help from someone stronger, then they can't be that strong, now can they? That's why they get attacked by the Left, since their underlying weakness is made visible. A "paper tiger" is not strong at all. It's just an illusion, a deception. That's how they can be defeated.

It was the same for the Romans, as they eventually reached a point where they could no longer fight their own battles and needed foreign mercenaries. And as for the British, they got in over their heads and needed outside help to protect their empire as well.

Even here in America, there's the common complaint that we've all grown soft, spoiled, and weak. That's why other countries are challenging us, because they see weakness and are spoiling for a fight. That's where capitalism loses, since it requires the overriding state militarism and nationalism to prop it up. That's where the "strength" truly comes from, but the capitalists have been bristling against that as of late, thinking that they can get along without the state (or with only a weakened, minimalist state which acts more as a corporate insurance society than an actual nation).
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
I'm not sure why it's taken for granted that the Left is overly concerned with Identity politics, as opposed to the Right.

I mean, isn't it the conservatives who are the ones super concerned about gay people getting married, or what bathrooms trans people use, or whether women can get abortions or birth control? Did not this current President get elected by stoking fears of Muslim and Mexican immigrants?

Sure, the Left is concerned with "identity politics" but so is the Right. Wby would the Left need to fight for LGBT rights if the Right wasn't trying to take them away?
Exactly, democrats fight for civil liberties and liberty. It all boils down to treating everyone as equal and with the same rights.

The right wingers have a religious problem. That's the main reason the right fights these equality things.

-Abortion = religious motivation
-Immigration = religious motivation
-Gay marriage = religious motivation
-Trans bathrooms = religious motivation

Some people don't like the fact that America's constitution forbids religious law.


Dog whistles incoming
 
Last edited:
Top