justa_gurl
Member
You are absolutely right, i should. Unfortunately, i haven't so i guess you'll just have to bare with me. I really appreciate your taking the time to reply and hope you'll continue to humor me though."You should read David Hume's A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects. "
If we could take a child straight from a womb, deny it all external influences and without the use of language determine his exact thoughts and feelings regarding life and the cosmos, deciding whether that child is reflecting anything in those experiences one could term spiritual or religious, it would be a fascinating experiment indeed. But that can not be done making your premise itself that beginning "with an idea of God is impossible" somewhat impossible to prove."You were not born with the innate idea of God. You had to have learned it somewhere. Most likely from your parents."
I completely understand why you suggest that theism might stem from external social, environmental, psychological influences or even flaws in reasoning the believer might be unaware of. But i have to ask you, hypothetically speaking couldn't the same be said of atheism?
I tend to disagree with this as well. You can't step outside your door without faith that a meteor won't land on your head and crush you. Can you prove that won't happen? Are you aware that you have this faith in the cosmos? Well.. chances are no, but the point remains that in order to progress a certain amount of faith is required of you. (Especially in regards to that which we do nor or can not know)"The benefit of faith is indulgence. To believe in our hopes."
Everyone is guided by their own experiences, can we truly begin with nothing? Some just end up with different conclusions, gravitating toward or away from those - who having similar experiences - have related their thoughts on the human experience in all its complexities throughout history by means of religious texts and poetic language. By what they're guided is hard to say."The question is about whether we begin with an established religious paradigm handed down to us from churches and parents and cultures, or if we begin with nothing and work our way towards establishing a world view predicated upon our own experience"
"Proof is simply the highest standard of judgment."
But what is proof? Experience? What experience, whose experience, which experiences? Behind every proof lies a subtle nod of humble agnosticism. You shouldn't underestimate the power of that damned gut instinct. Sometimes, just sometimes there's truth to be found that can't be proven.
A belief is only a belief if the real answer can't be determined. It is a truth tucked away "waiting further insight", otherwise it'd just be fact and who has that regarding origins?"when a belief really matters, why would one not employ the highest standard of judgment?"