ppp
Well-Known Member
I am sure that you think that matters.I think we have a scripture for that:
Last edited by a moderator:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I am sure that you think that matters.I think we have a scripture for that:
I am sure that you think that matters.
In the census of the 12 tribes of Israel, boys weren't counted as people until 30 days of age. Girls and women weren't counted as people at all.Please show the scripture that says so?
So in this analogy, literal surgery is the "stabbing" and mass genocide is "surgery"?No more hypocrisy than a surgeon objecting to a stabbing.
The truth of a claim does not depend on to whom you speak. Or do you think that there is no objective reality?LOL.. it just depends on who you speak to. I support your right to say it doesn't matter.!
When does reality conform to what you think is objective?The truth of a claim does not depend on to whom you speak. Or do you think that there is no objective reality?
I'm not interested in conversation with someone who won't answer questions. Have a lovely day.When does reality conform to what you think is objective?
I'm not interested in conversation with someone who won't answer questions. Have a lovely day.
No it doesn't.You are correct... it deals with the value of an unborn child and its unnatural ejection from the womb.
God did kind of repent for doing this Genesis 8:20-22There are countless verses in the Bible that are not "pro-life." To begin, I'll tell you about Noah's Ark, in which the Bible's God drowns the entire earth in a rage-fueled flood. Given that some of the women were probably pregnant when God drowned them in his wrath, that doesn't sound very "pro-life." That indicates that in just the first book of the Bible, God was responsible for the death of the unborn.
I disagree.No it doesn't.
This is about a third party attacking a pregnant woman and the woman miscarrying due to the violent act.
This has nothing to do with the abortion debate.
Is it an objective fact that the world is not flat? That would seem to be an example wouldn't you say?When does reality conform to what you think is objective?
Is it an objective fact that the world is not flat? That would seem to be an example wouldn't you say?
I disagree.
Yet there are those who still believe its flat even as there are those who believe prayer is an effort in futility.
Sheldon said: ↑
Is it an objective fact that the world is not flat? That would seem to be an example wouldn't you say?
Yet there are those who still believe its flat
KenS said: ↑
When does reality conform to what you think is objective?
EXACTLY!The question wasn't about what people BELIEVE.
It was about what is OBJECTIVELY TRUE.
Learn the difference.
Your context was in the scriptural quote.I can only blame that on stubborness.
I'm sorry you don't see the obvious difference between a third party attacking someone and a person herself making a decision.
Consider the difference between having sex with mutual consent on the one hand and being raped on the other.
In both cases, people have sex.
Do you see a difference though?
It's the same difference.
Nice strawman.You seem to have ignored yet another question. Is it an objective fact that world is not flat? I am not asking what preposterous beliefs people hold. I answered your question:
You either agree that the assertion the world is not flat is an objective fact or you do not. If you do, then that would be an example of reality conforming to what I also believe to be objectively true. Which coincides with the overwhelming objective evidence, and not by accident obviously.
EXACTLY!