Shushersbedamned
Well-Known Member
Yes, it is.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I've Sacrificed my belief in Evolution for Religion
- Thread starter NathantheProfit
- Start date
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, I asked what you meant by that word. You then improperly used a dictionary definition.
When you get your info from another source you should link it.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
When I was a Lutheran they taught us to be honest. Quote mining is not honest. Try again.
Shushersbedamned
Well-Known Member
And I answered.
Shushersbedamned
Well-Known Member
Try what again?
exchemist
Veteran Member
I would remind you the subject of this thread is about evolution versus creationist belief. So this thread is precisely one of those in which the distinction between proof and evidence can be crucial.
Shushersbedamned
Well-Known Member
I don't think so. And this thread was about someone wanting to abandon they belief in evolution.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, you made a weak excuse. That was not an answer.
Shushersbedamned
Well-Known Member
It was an answer. A definition.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You were caught being far less than honest. Go back and try to respond honestly to the post that was more than you can handle and try again.
Shushersbedamned
Well-Known Member
I wasn't caught. You can't define the level of my honesty, I do not need to go back, I already responded honestly. You can't order me to try anything.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, it was an improper answer.
it is improper to not fully quote short answers. Editing a post that you are answering in such a matter implies that you are trying to lie through omission.
By editing you tell us you know that you were wrong.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Sure you were. I even explained how you were caught. Your errors won't go away by running away from them.
Shushersbedamned
Well-Known Member
Sometimes texts are edited because of a spelling mistake. How negative you are! It wasn't improer. And if you had a proper answer to that answer you wouldn't be bawling over the property - you would be going on to make your fabulous point.
Shushersbedamned
Well-Known Member
Failure, caught, but not stupid. You are so negative. I hope you don't attempt to raise children.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
There was nothing wrong with my reply. I explained your errors. The proper action would have been to correct the behavior.
You lost.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Did I say that you were stupid? Your failure was caught. You should have admitted it.
Watch the personal attacks.
Shushersbedamned
Well-Known Member
I take "you failed" as a personal attack. "You were caught" is a misconception. Your words say from between "you're stupid, you can't, you're not able, you're not good enough, I'm better than you, I know better, etc."
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
The last comment that you made was a clear personal attack. Pointing out your errors, and even using the phrase "you failed" is an observation.
And where have I said those words that would be personal attacks?
By not correcting your past bad actions you only make them worse.
exchemist
Veteran Member
Then you are not thinking straight about this. "You failed" is equivalent to saying "you are wrong". If you construe "you are wrong" as a personal attack , all debate is obviously impossible.
It is in fact you who is introducing allegations of personal motive, rather than addressing the point on its merits.