Sha'irullah
رسول الآلهة
I have brought this up numerous times and most Christians deny its implications of imperfection with in Jesus signifying his separation from God.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And you're willing to claim that ...... without a shred of evidence. You simply fabricate your facts and proclaim them.
Perhaps we should get back on topic or simply let the thread die a natural death.
I have brought this up numerous times and most Christians deny its implications of imperfection with in Jesus signifying his separation from God.
Your reference?It says they cursed him; ...
Your reference?
Choosing to go off topic? Post your translation, your definition for the word 'curse,' and what it means to do so in the name of God, then we can compare arguments. If you honestly believe this would or should last past the next one or two posts by either of us, make a new thread.
No. You made a claim. Support it or scurry off, I could care less.Choosing to go off topic?
No. You made a claim. Support it or scurry off, I could care less.
You're babbling. Show me that translation that asserts cursing.You must've missed my entire first and second posts? My support lies in their number, being more than 42. 42 were mauled. By two bears. Two bears mauled 42 people, regardless of age or sex. Some however, of the total, escaped. Now how did only two bears maul 42 people? Why didn't more of them escape? Obviously their escape was limited. My sense tells me there was quite a large number of people jeering. Quite a bit more than 42. Because otherwise there would be no reason such a high number failed to escape only 2 bears. My other sense tells me that 42> children wouldn't gather to jeer someone with something specific and deliberate: 'Go up bald head.' Not to mention, they all came out of the town for this purpose.
If you have some other logical interpretation of the events to argue, I wait, but don't lie to yourself and say I scurried anywhere, when you're not even visible yet. Appear first.
You're babbling. Show me that translation that asserts cursing.
Any of these ...You simply don't know what you're talking about.
I know exactly. But you have nothing to talk about, for that reason.
They mocked Elisha. They cursed him, saying 'Go up, bald head.' Did they not? And do you also deny that Elisha, in God's name, was able to call them cursed (vile according to YLT), for this reason? The prophet of God was able to prophetically speak on their condition, which was death, and it was fulfilled by their deaths. Was he not?
Yep.They mocked Elisha.
"Go up, bald head." is a curse only in your head.They cursed him, saying 'Go up, bald head.'
Yep.
"Go up, bald head." is a curse only in your head.
Are you saying that the Bible was mistaken when it says that it was a group of children (in some interpretations) or a group of boys (in other interpretations)?You must've missed my entire first and second posts? My support lies in their number, being more than 42. 42 were mauled. By two bears. Two bears mauled 42 people, regardless of age or sex. Some however, of the total, escaped. Now how did only two bears maul 42 people? Why didn't more of them escape? Obviously their escape was limited. My sense tells me there was quite a large number of people jeering. Quite a bit more than 42. Because otherwise there would be no reason such a high number failed to escape only 2 bears. My other sense tells me that 42> children wouldn't gather to jeer someone with something specific and deliberate: 'Go up bald head.' Not to mention, they all came out of the town for this purpose.
If you have some other logical interpretation of the events to argue, I wait, but don't lie to yourself and say I scurried anywhere, when you're not even visible yet. Appear first.