Jesus Christ the King of Kings has declared war on the US Supreme Court.

[sojourner]

Wrong. I am not "preaching" at all; but I am simply standing my ground.

Nothing wrong with defending your argument and position.

"Your" ground. It's not "your" ground -- it's God's ground, and anyone claiming to be Jesus should know that. Therefore, there is everything wrong with claiming what clearly belongs to God and abusing it.

 

[sojourner]

Since when did Jesus ever 'kill' anybody?

"Sending everyone to hell" is eternal death. Therefore, using your logic here, Jesus would never "send anyone to hell."

 

[sojourner]

No, it's not a sin to humble yourself; but it would be sin for another person to make you humbled, and to have done it without your consent.

That's why Jesus refrained from calling the religious authorities a "brood of vipers," and why he refrained from whipping people and physically throwing them out of the temple. Because humbling others without their consent is sin.

 

[sojourner]

No, I think you should repent; because I am Jesus.

I can send all of America to hell if I want.

The most preposterous notion that H. sapiens has ever dreamed up is that the Lord God of Creation, Shaper and Ruler of all the Universes, wants the saccharine adoration of His creatures, can be swayed by prayers, and becomes petulant if He does not receive this flattery. Yet this absurd fantasy, without a shred of evidence to bolster it, pays all the expenses of the oldest, largest and least productive industry in all history.
-- Lazarus Long

 

[Revoltingest]

In April 2012, the Supreme Court said that police and prison guards have a 'right' to strip search people for the most trivial offence such as "unpaid parking tickets". So now, it's not only murderers who can be strip searched, but even the most trivial offence can take away a persons's Fourth Amendment Rights.

I found this part of your post most interesting.
Near then end of the video, the newscastress said that you forfeit your right to privacy when you're arrested.
Tis an interesting choice of words.
Essentially, the victim makes the choice to forfeit civil rights when someone else makes the decision to arrest them.
I don't see the initial choice being made here.

 

[Kilgore Trout]

I found this part of your post most interesting.
Near then end of the video, the newscastress said that you forfeit your right to privacy when you're arrested.
Tis an interesting choice of words.
Essentially, the victim makes the choice to forfeit civil rights when someone else makes the decision to arrest them.
I don't see the initial choice being made here.

Well, then don't commit a crime, or be perceived of possibly committing a crime...or annoy someone who can arrest you for a crime they allege you did...or be in the wrong place at the wrong time and be mistakenly thought to have committed a crime...or not commit a crime, but get arrested anyway because of a police officer who is ignorant of the actual law.

Just don't choose to do those things and you shouldn't have any problems.

 

[sojourner]

In April 2012, the Supreme Court said that police and prison guards have a 'right' to strip search people for the most trivial offence such as "unpaid parking tickets". So now, it's not only murderers who can be strip searched, but even the most trivial offence can take away a persons's Fourth Amendment Rights.

However, we know that God's second commandment is that we should "love our neighbour" in Matthew 22:37-40; Mark 12:30-31 & Luke 10:27. But strip searching without a good reason means that you have broken God's commandment to "love your neighbour". Because such inhumane treatment is degrading and humiliating; and it shows lack of love for your fellow human. Therefore, we know that police and prison guards who carry out strip searching are guilty of SIN. Also, the Supreme Court Judges who authorised this are also guilty of SIN by breaking God's commandment. Because strip searching people without sufficient cause to do so is a serious violation of human rights.

Such a procedure by police and prison guards is inexcusable; because other Western countries also have their own War on Drugs, and they are equally concerned about security issues in prisons, but in no European country will you find such inhumane treatment for the most trivial offence.

Therefore, Supreme Court Judges who have authorised such human rights violation will themselves be judged before the Judgement Seat of Christ and Great White Throne Judgement. (2 Corinthians 5:10; Matthew 25:31-46; Revelation 20:11-15)

Despite being Judges, they have still committed human rights violation and sinned against men, and against God; which will have serious repercussions on the day of judgement.

God does not condone, nor accept Supreme Court Judges who have committed such sin against their fellow humans. Such are "persona non grata" who will have no right to Eternal life in God's kingdom.

Do you agree that Supreme Court Judges will be brought to account for their sin against men, and against God; and they will be thrown into the lake of fire on judgement day?

Do you agree that Supreme Court Judges who authorised this deserve to be completely utterly destroyed in the lake of fire?

P.S. Such a law is inexcusable because it doesn't happen in England, nor anywhere else in the Anglo-sphere. Sexual perverts such as they are must be brought to account for their crimes on the day of judgement. (Matthew 13:40-42, 25:41; Revelation 20:15, 21:8)

Jesus "declaring war" on any human being is incongruent with the biblical record.

 

[Revoltingest]

Well, then don't commit a crime, or be perceived of possibly committing a crime...or annoy someone who can arrest you for a crime they allege you did...or be in the wrong place at the wrong time and be mistakenly thought to have committed a crime...or not commit a crime, but get arrested anyway because of a police officer who is ignorant of the actual law.

Just don't choose to do those things and you shouldn't have any problems.

It seems so clear when you put it that way!

 

[Muffled]

No, it's not a sin to humble yourself; but it would be sin for another person to make you humbled, and to have done it without your consent.

I don't believe anyone can make me humble. I either will choose to be or not. For instance I was leg chained to go before the judge that I had called evil. That should have been humbling but the Holy Spirit was in me with authority and I told the judge just what the Holy Spirit wished me to say. I expect that the attempt at humbling was to elicit a contrition that just was not going to happen.

 

[Muffled]

Jesus "declaring war" on any human being is incongruent with the biblical record.

I believe the Biblical record says that He will.

 

[Muffled]

So? Don't we all according to Abrahamic religions?

No. I believe Chistians are covered by the blood.

 

[sojourner]

I believe the Biblical record says that He will.

Where?

 

[Jainarayan]

I don't believe anyone can make me humble. I either will choose to be or not. For instance I was leg chained to go before the judge that I had called evil. That should have been humbling but the Holy Spirit was in me with authority and I told the judge just what the Holy Spirit wished me to say. I expect that the attempt at humbling was to elicit a contrition that just was not going to happen.

And you were then remanded without bail, or found in contempt?

 

[SomeRandom]

No. I believe Chistians are covered by the blood.

You know for a religion started by a pretty pacifist guy, there's a lot of violent, gory symbolism and metaphors within Christianity.

Anyway, if the only sin you can't be forgiven for is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, aren't you pretty screwed regardless if you commit it? Like be Christian as much as you like, that particular sin is eternal and unforgivable?
And didn't Jesus bleed for ALL, not just his chosen followers, but for mankind?

 

[Muffled]

You know for a religion started by a pretty pacifist guy, there's a lot of violent, gory symbolism and metaphors within Christianity.

Anyway, if the only sin you can't be forgiven for is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, aren't you pretty screwed regardless if you commit it? Like be Christian as much as you like, that particular sin is eternal and unforgivable?
And didn't Jesus bleed for ALL, not just his chosen followers, but for mankind?

I believe it is quite simple that a Christian will neveer be found committing this sin.

I believe He did but that does not mean that all are covered by the blood.

 

[sojourner]

I believe He did but that does not mean that all are covered by the blood.

...because Christ's sacrifice and Christ's blood are weak and ineffective for the job?

 

[Muffled]

Thorbjorn said: "And you were then remanded without bail, or found in contempt?"

I believe , I was returned to finish my 30 days which turned out to be three weeks with time off for good behavior and the last week in a halfway house on work release. I said nothing further that would put me in contempt but I did not recant so my sentence was not shortened.

 

[Muffled]

...because Christ's sacrifice and Christ's blood are weak and ineffective for the job?

I do not believe so but because men are weak and reject God.

 

[Muffled]

Where?

Rev. 19:11 ¶ And I saw the heaven opened; and behold, a white horse, and he that sat thereon called Faithful and True; and in righteousness he doth judge and make war.

 

[sojourner]

Rev. 19:11 ¶ And I saw the heaven opened; and behold, a white horse, and he that sat thereon called Faithful and True; and in righteousness he doth judge and make war.

Against... whom?