• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Jesus divinity

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
Ooooh no. Not one of these again. :rolleyes: Nope. We are not debating whether or not He is God.

IF Jesus is not God (God refering to Father only), how would that change His role as 1. God's chosen Son 2. Christ's Mission from God, 3. His perfect nature given by God?

Exclusions

Jesus is Not God folks: Can you help me with showing that Jesus can save people without being God? (Remember, we are not debating the proof of Him not being God)

Jesus is God (the Father) folks: Please pretend. I am not stating He is or not. I am saying IF. If that is hard to think about, give it a shot. (Remember, we are not proving Jesus is God.)

I hate clauses.
 

InChrist

Free4ever
My perspective is that if Jesus is not God then our sins are not paid for and we have no Savior. I believe that only the infinite God has the capability to pay for the sins of every human who has ever lived or will live. Anyone less, a created being, angel, or whoever could not accomplish what only God Himself has the infinite power to do in saving His creation.
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
My perspective is that if Jesus is not God then our sins are not paid for and we have no Savior. I believe that only the infinite God has the capability to pay for the sins of every human who has ever lived or will live. Anyone less, a created being, angel, or whoever could not accomplish what only God Himself has the infinite power to do in saving His creation.

Would it make sense that God can create a 'perfect' human to do this since this Human is not less than God but His equal? Would one feel a human imperfect when God can create one who is pefect and save christians without being the person who created Him?


EDIT

In other words, would a human God chosen to make perfect be less than God? Would it make sense that God can create a perfect human, equal to Him in nature, to save humanity and still be human?

Can one limit God's power based on whether He sent a human to save us?
 

InChrist

Free4ever
Would it make sense that God can create a 'perfect' human to do this since this Human is not less than God but His equal? Would one feel a human imperfect when God can create one who is pefect and save christians without being the person who created Him?

EDIT

In other words, would a human God chosen to make perfect be less than God? Would it make sense that God can create a perfect human, equal to Him in nature, to save humanity and still be human?

Can one limit God's power based on whether He sent a human to save us?

That does not make sense to me. if God could have made perfect humans who are not forced robots He would have and we would all be perfect.The scriptures say we were made in His image yet He allows each the freedom to choose to love and obey Him. I think the very fact that any being created in less than God or not God means that a creature falls short of God's perfection, as the scriptures indicates, simply because we are not GOD. I believe only the ONE uncreated, eternal God Himself is perfect and therefore, only He has the ability to save.
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
That does not make sense to me. if God could have made perfect humans who are not forced robots He would have and we would all be perfect.The scriptures say we were made in His image yet He allows each the freedom to choose to love and obey Him. I think the very fact that any being created in less than God or not God means that a creature falls short of God's perfection, as the scriptures indicates, simply because we are not GOD. I believe only the ONE uncreated, eternal God Himself is perfect and therefore, only He has the ability to save.

Hmm. Good insight. I'd say if God made all of us perfect, we would still have freedom of choice. What makes me puzzled is, why do Christians want a freedom of choice between good and evil. If we were in the Garden of Eden, as scriptures teaches, would it not be freedom of choice to chose between eating an apple rather than an orange? Also, on that note, we have a "tendency" to sin because of the snake (for point not for historical accuracy; I don't share the original sin teaching). Jesus had a tendency to sin as well.

Back on point, if God created a human who is perfect, that person is still not God. He has a choice to disobey God, just as Christ did. He has a choice to love God, just as Jesus. His being human (flesh) should not negate this God created human from being perfect.

Sorry, I can't figure how to get my point out in one paragraph.

We can't limit God's power to send a human to die on the cross as he chose unless Christians define humans by original sin; which, is not the case. Christians have a tendency to sin just as Jesus. I find that if Christians are completely devoted to God (one hundred percent) then they have the same ability to die for humanity because they did not do so, it was God through them.

Understand?
 

Servant_of_the_One1

Well-Known Member
Jesus is not God because God is greater him. Why are we calling him good, only God is Good!
Stop following will of Jesus, he followed will of God!
You are non-jew? Dont take it personal, Jesus is only for the lost sheep of israel :)
 
"Not every one who is saying to me Lord, lord, shall come into the reign of the heavens; but he who is doing the will of my Father who is in the heavens. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, lord, have we not in thy name prophesied? and in thy name cast out demons? and in thy name done many mighty things? And then I will acknowledge to them, that -- I never knew you, depart from me ye who are working lawlessness."
Jesus

You could be right.
 

Servant_of_the_One1

Well-Known Member
The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified his SERVANT Jesus. You handed him over to be killed, and you disowned him before Pilate, though he had decided to let him go.
 

InChrist

Free4ever
Hmm. Good insight. I'd say if God made all of us perfect, we would still have freedom of choice. What makes me puzzled is, why do Christians want a freedom of choice between good and evil. If we were in the Garden of Eden, as scriptures teaches, would it not be freedom of choice to chose between eating an apple rather than an orange? Also, on that note, we have a "tendency" to sin because of the snake (for point not for historical accuracy; I don't share the original sin teaching). Jesus had a tendency to sin as well.

Back on point, if God created a human who is perfect, that person is still not God. He has a choice to disobey God, just as Christ did. He has a choice to love God, just as Jesus. His being human (flesh) should not negate this God created human from being perfect.

Sorry, I can't figure how to get my point out in one paragraph.

We can't limit God's power to send a human to die on the cross as he chose unless Christians define humans by original sin; which, is not the case. Christians have a tendency to sin just as Jesus. I find that if Christians are completely devoted to God (one hundred percent) then they have the same ability to die for humanity because they did not do so, it was God through them.

Understand?
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I think I understand some of what you are saying, but maybe not completely. When I read the scriptures one of the main things I have seen is that It must have been very important for God to create beings with a free will. I believe this is because God is Love and love must be given freely to be real love. So the choice to love and obey God or rebel and disobey had to be in place. I i see it as much more than a choice between apples and oranges because the choice involves either living in harmony with God who is the source of eternal life or rejecting God and living in eternal separation.
The reality, according to the scriptures, is that every human sins and at times does not love and obey God or love their neighbor. Christ was the only one who always lived in perfect love and obedience and I believe this is because He was God in the flesh....Son of God(fully God) and Son of man(fully human). I also believe that since the penalty for sin is eternal that only the eternal God could possibly pay such an infinite and eternal price. No one finite human could ever do so.
 

InChrist

Free4ever
Jesus is not God because God is greater him. Why are we calling him good, only God is Good!
Stop following will of Jesus, he followed will of God!
You are non-jew? Dont take it personal, Jesus is only for the lost sheep of israel :)
The scriptures do not say God is greater than Jesus. Jesus said His Father was greater than He and that He was going to His Father. (John 14:28) First it must be noted that at the time of saying this Jesus was in the flesh on earth, so it stands to reason that the Father was in a greater position in heaven, Secondly, in the human realm simply because someone holds a greater position it does not mean they are a better human being. A world leader may hold a greater position than you, but that does not mean you are any less human does it? The heavenly realm the Father holds a greater position than the Son but this does not make Jesus less God in His essence or nature from my perspective and what I see revealed concerning who He is from the scriptures. Along with that Jesus is shown to be good from everything which is recorded about Him. The scriptures do not indicate He is bad or sinful and on the contrary it is stated that He is the perfect Lamb of God, true and faithful, the King of kings and Lord of lords. Therefore, I believe that because Jesus is good He is God. His perfect goodness proves He is God and the Savior of not only the Jews, but the world (John 3:16).
 

VioletVortex

Well-Known Member
If Jesus did exist, he was a mortal, not a god. His so called miracles were probably just misunderstandings of figurative language.
 

Servant_of_the_One1

Well-Known Member
The scriptures do not say God is greater than Jesus. Jesus said His Father was greater than He and that He was going to His Father. (John 14:28) First it must be noted that at the time of saying this Jesus was in the flesh on earth, so it stands to reason that the Father was in a greater position in heaven, Secondly, in the human realm simply because someone holds a greater position it does not mean they are a better human being. A world leader may hold a greater position than you, but that does not mean you are any less human does it? The heavenly realm the Father holds a greater position than the Son but this does not make Jesus less God in His essence or nature from my perspective and what I see revealed concerning who He is from the scriptures. Along with that Jesus is shown to be good from everything which is recorded about Him. The scriptures do not indicate He is bad or sinful and on the contrary it is stated that He is the perfect Lamb of God, true and faithful, the King of kings and Lord of lords. Therefore, I believe that because Jesus is good He is God. His perfect goodness proves He is God and the Savior of not only the Jews, but the world (John 3:16).




Jesus pbuh called the Father His God and our God. But nice try!
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
I understand and disagree. Though, why would we need to have bad consequences be be tempted in a perfect environment? For me personally, Id rather serve God freely than be put to the test as if being put to the test makes love for Him greater than serving in a perfect Eden.

I also wouldnt see it as taking free will away. Id see it as a chance to have a relationship with God. Just because I am perfect does not mean I have a relationship with Him.

I find picking between apples and oranges better because I know love by God's example Not by my consequence for bad actions I need not have done. I find we learn more positively by example rather than learn by fear/consequence.

There doesnt need to be evil to have freedom to love God. I woudnt feel forced. I would WANT to love Him. If original sin was true, I would NEED to. In my opinion, that is not a true relationship.

Also, I find it terrible that you and anyone would believe that people will die without believing in their God. If someone doesnt live by the cycle of nature, they "could" disbenefit from it by becoming sick and dying early from artifical foods and chemicals. As someone who reveres nature, that would be terrible to see.

However, Id never tell someone that without loving a holistic life, they suffer consequences. Many people have been healthy for yeara without going all natural.

Its not my place for "me" to believe otherwise. I dont understand the logic of thinking people will die without the christian God.


Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I think I understand some of what you are saying, but maybe not completely. When I read the scriptures one of the main things I have seen is that It must have been very important for God to create beings with a free will. I believe this is because God is Love and love must be given freely to be real love. So the choice to love and obey God or rebel and disobey had to be in place. I i see it as much more than a choice between apples and oranges because the choice involves either living in harmony with God who is the source of eternal life or rejecting God and living in eternal separation.
The reality, according to the scriptures, is that every human sins and at times does not love and obey God or love their neighbor. Christ was the only one who always lived in perfect love and obedience and I believe this is because He was God in the flesh....Son of God(fully God) and Son of man(fully human). I also believe that since the penalty for sin is eternal that only the eternal God could possibly pay such an infinite and eternal price. No one finite human could ever do so.
 

InChrist

Free4ever
Jesus pbuh called the Father His God and our God. But nice try!
Do the scriptures not say... the Word became flesh and dwelt among us (John 1:14)? According to the scriptures He came to earth and became human. Along with being the only Son of God Jesus was fully human and as such identified with His creation (John 1:3,10) for the sake of representing humanity and going to the cross to pay for the sins of world. So certainly from this fully human position while being our representative and example He would say, 'My God and our God".
 

JayJayDee

Avid JW Bible Student
Hmm. Good insight. I'd say if God made all of us perfect, we would still have freedom of choice.

Exactly. Free will was a gift, but once it was abused, it became a curse. Was God wrong in giving us a quality we could use in a wrong way? Remember that a knowledge of evil was not available when the gift was given. Without evil, there were no bad choices to be made. If the devil had not made disobeying God appear to be beneficial, Eve would never have taken the fruit, but she was talked into believing the fruit would make her "like God"! Adam could have rejected her offer, but in full knowledge of the consequences, he followed her into rebellion and unleashed the knowledge that would make free will into a terrible burden.

Look at all the horrible things that happen in the world and see that every one of them is the result of someone abusing their free will and imposing it on someone with less power....to their detriment.

What makes me puzzled is, why do Christians want a freedom of choice between good and evil. If we were in the Garden of Eden, as scriptures teaches, would it not be freedom of choice to chose between eating an apple rather than an orange? Also, on that note, we have a "tendency" to sin because of the snake (for point not for historical accuracy; I don't share the original sin teaching). Jesus had a tendency to sin as well.

This is an assumption Carlita. The tendency to sin is what we inherited from Adam. (Rom 5:12) Adam did not have a tendency to sin when he was created, he had the ability to choose his actions. Couple this with man's ability to contemplate the future and plan his activities around a perceived outcome, we see how the devil got to the woman, to get to the man. It was calculated. I know that many people have a warped view of original sin, so could you tell me what you think it is that you disagree with?

Back on point
, if God created a human who is perfect, that person is still not God. He has a choice to disobey God, just as Christ did. He has a choice to love God, just as Jesus. His being human (flesh) should not negate this God created human from being perfect.

Sorry, I can't figure how to get my point out in one paragraph.

Not sure what you are trying to say here, but Jesus came into the world as a perfect, sinless human being to atone for the sin of Adam's children. A perfect life was lost for them through no fault on their part, so God arranged for a life to be given on their behalf to satisfy justice. God's law stated "eye for an eye, tooth for tooth, life for life." Adam and his wife paid for their sin with their own lives, just as God said they would, but they left a legacy of sin in their children who pay sins wages with their lives too. Since perfection and sinlessness was lost for them, with no way for them to pay it back, Jesus came as a perfect man to balance the scales of justice. A perfect life was lost, so a perfect life had to be offered to break the cycle of sin and death and give Adam's children (us) back what their father lost for them. No perfect person existed on the planet, so that is why Jesus had to come from outside the now imperfect human race. Our debt is now paid by the sacrifice of Jesus' perfect life, given freely in our behalf.

He did not have to be God to offer his life....all he had to be was the perfect equivalent to Adam.


We can't limit God's power to send a human to die on the cross as he chose unless Christians define humans by original sin; which, is not the case. Christians have a tendency to sin just as Jesus. I find that if Christians are completely devoted to God (one hundred percent) then they have the same ability to die for humanity because they did not do so, it was God through them.

Understand?
I think I understand what you are saying, but I disagree for the reasons stated above.

Humans have a tendency to sin because of imperfection. There is a tendency towards wrong choices, despite our ability to foresee where those choices will take us...we succumb to them anyway. Paul noted his own struggle with sin's "law". (Rom 7:14-25) Who cannot identify with his dilemma? See who he credits for the rescue?

Adam and Jesus as perfect human specimens, did not have sin in their DNA...what they had was free will. One chose to disobey and forfeited the life and future that God planned for him and for his children. The other remained obedient and loyal to his God and acted selflessly for the benefit of all.

Free will was meant to be a blessing, allowing humans to make choices every day that would enhance their existence in many ways.....but once they became imperfect, their choices between good and evil became skewed, and sins laws prevailed in their imperfect flesh.

The only way to retain free will as the gift it was meant to be was to allow humans to experience first hand what happens when it is abused and we disobey the legitimate commands of our Maker.

We are all now tested as to fitness first before God goes ahead with his purpose...not just for this earth, but for the vast universe he created. Who knows what he has in store? The sky is literally the limit! :)
 
Last edited:

InChrist

Free4ever
I understand and disagree. Though, why would we need to have bad consequences be be tempted in a perfect environment? For me personally, Id rather serve God freely than be put to the test as if being put to the test makes love for Him greater than serving in a perfect Eden.

I also wouldnt see it as taking free will away. Id see it as a chance to have a relationship with God. Just because I am perfect does not mean I have a relationship with Him.

I find picking between apples and oranges better because I know love by God's example Not by my consequence for bad actions I need not have done. I find we learn more positively by example rather than learn by fear/consequence.

There doesnt need to be evil to have freedom to love God. I woudnt feel forced. I would WANT to love Him. If original sin was true, I would NEED to. In my opinion, that is not a true relationship.

Also, I find it terrible that you and anyone would believe that people will die without believing in their God. If someone doesnt live by the cycle of nature, they "could" disbenefit from it by becoming sick and dying early from artifical foods and chemicals. As someone who reveres nature, that would be terrible to see.

However, Id never tell someone that without loving a holistic life, they suffer consequences. Many people have been healthy for yeara without going all natural.

Its not my place for "me" to believe otherwise. I dont understand the logic of thinking people will die without the christian God.
Well, I think the scriptures point that although the first humans and even Lucifer had a completely positive environment to start with where there was no evil, fear, or negative consequences yet, they still choose to trust self instead of God. Trust is a major aspect of love, but rather than lovingly trust their Creator, Lucifer and then Adam and Eve choose to exalt and trust themselves.
I'm not really telling anyone anything, except reiterating what the scriptures say. If you or anyone thinks it's terrible it is between you and God. No one is accountable to me, that's for sure. Personally, I think that God as the Creator of life has a responsibility to tell His creation what is necessary for us to function correctly and I am grateful for His wisdom and value knowing what is necessary for an eternal life of joy and love with Him. On top of that realizing that He has provided all that is needed by His sacrificial love causes me to love Him all the more.
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
I understand your faith and read it in full.

I disagree with original sin. I agree only according to scripture not my personal faith that the devil tempted adam and eve. I agree they were born with the tendency.

What I read is the same as children today. As a child we do not know right from wrong. My "right" may be different from yours so its not universal. If a child steals a toy his brother may learn from him and do the same. The brother was given the knowledge of thrief by example. I also dont believe we have origin sin. Thats totally against our natures.

The only way to retain free will as the gift it was meant to be was to allow humans to experience first hand what happens when it is abused and we disobey the legitimate commands of our Maker.

We dont need to experience the bad to appreciate the good. I dont need to be in a car reck to appreciate life. We assume this because we think "lool at the murder in the world" and feel a need to justify the death of others to help with being comfortable with uncertainty.

Its not bad just I find it a delusion to the world we live in by justifying some bad acts like saying taking a life is right if its from God.

I have a pet peeve with death in the Bible including Jesus' My Buddha nature cant handle death to break life (punishment for good)

Anyway, I understand what you are saying. I disagree withnthe free will comment.
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
Well, I think the scriptures point that although the first humans and even Lucifer had a completely positive environment to start with where there was no evil, fear, or negative consequences yet, they still choose to trust self instead of God. Trust is a major aspect of love, but rather than lovingly trust their Creator, Lucifer and then Adam and Eve choose to exalt and trust themselves.
I'm not really telling anyone anything, except reiterating what the scriptures say. If you or anyone thinks it's terrible it is between you and God. No one is accountable to me, that's for sure. Personally, I think that God as the Creator of life has a responsibility to tell His creation what is necessary for us to function correctly and I am grateful for His wisdom and value knowing what is necessary for an eternal life of joy and love with Him. On top of that realizing that He has provided all that is needed by His sacrificial love causes me to love Him all the more.
The first paragraph, I find that a negative outlook. Id think that leaving satan in the garden tempt is just plan cruel. I understand the self comment.

The second paragrah, I always wanted to understand how christians cannot see eternal life for someone else unless they believe in their Godm

That is a discussion I rather have with a Christian. If I believed in God, Id ask Him about the christian not what God thinks. We each have different ways of expressing what we believe is truth.

Kinda like me going to my boss for something my co-worker did rather than settling it with her first.
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
Ooooh no. Not one of these again. :rolleyes: Nope. We are not debating whether or not He is God.

IF Jesus is not God (God refering to Father only), how would that change His role as 1. God's chosen Son 2. Christ's Mission from God, 3. His perfect nature given by God?

Exclusions

Jesus is Not God folks: Can you help me with showing that Jesus can save people without being God? (Remember, we are not debating the proof of Him not being God)

Jesus is God (the Father) folks: Please pretend. I am not stating He is or not. I am saying IF. If that is hard to think about, give it a shot. (Remember, we are not proving Jesus is God.)

I hate clauses.
If he is it isn't it doesn't change much. As I understand the Trinity is a bit of a mystery in an attempt to explain how God relates to humans. Jesus being God attempts to explain the nature between God and humans.
 

JoStories

Well-Known Member
Ooooh no. Not one of these again. :rolleyes: Nope. We are not debating whether or not He is God.

IF Jesus is not God (God refering to Father only), how would that change His role as 1. God's chosen Son 2. Christ's Mission from God, 3. His perfect nature given by God?

Exclusions

Jesus is Not God folks: Can you help me with showing that Jesus can save people without being God? (Remember, we are not debating the proof of Him not being God)

Jesus is God (the Father) folks: Please pretend. I am not stating He is or not. I am saying IF. If that is hard to think about, give it a shot. (Remember, we are not proving Jesus is God.)

I hate clauses.
I don't think anyone can answer that because of the word 'save'. What does that mean exactly? Saved from what? The reason I love Buddhism so much is because The Buddha never pretended to be God or a part of God. He merely strove to teach people how to become enlightened. I further think that if Jesus did live, he was a prophet or messenger of sorts, very similar to The Buddha. I don't believe God would send anyone to be a son of anything.
 
Top