Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Well, we have to look at why Jesus drank wine, and what wine is. Dan in a different thread talked about the translation of the word wine. Perhaps he will do that again. So I will look at why Jesus would have drank alcoholic wine.Merlin said:Why do some Christian groups ban drinking wine, even to celebrate the last supper? If wine was good enough for Jesus, why should we settle for fruit juice?
Can you tell me the alcoholic content of that wine?Merlin said:Why do some Christian groups ban drinking wine, even to celebrate the last supper? If wine was good enough for Jesus, why should we settle for fruit juice?
Since the purpose of communion is to remember Jesus' sacrifice, the drink we choose to symbolize the Last Supper really isn't relevant is it?Merlin said:Why do some Christian groups ban drinking wine, even to celebrate the last supper? If wine was good enough for Jesus, why should we settle for fruit juice?
Perhap they were just well behaved whilst drinking. Or maybe jesus kept a real smooth atmosphere over his parties. An underatted miracle not doubt, but perhaps it could count.EEWRED said:2) If the wine created was alcoholic, it would have been equivalent to a couple of kegs of alcoholic substance, and would be liked to having a massive keg party, and allow everyone to be drunk. I find it hard to believe that the Lord would on one hand instruct us to, "not be drunk with wine", and at the same time create enough one to do exactly that to everyone at the wedding feast.
What do you think it was?dan said:Can you tell me the alcoholic content of that wine?
It was also described as 'the best wine they had that day'. If you know wine, That would not be said of the juice straight from the press.EEWRED said:I am pretty sure that in the occation in which Jesus turned water into wine, it was non-alcoholic wine that was made by him. I say this for two reasons:
1) The reference is for "New Wine" which means new from the grape, which would not have had time to ferment, and therefore not contain alcohol.
2) If the wine created was alcoholic, it would have been equivalent to a couple of kegs of alcoholic substance, and would be liked to having a massive keg party, and allow everyone to be drunk. I find it hard to believe that the Lord would on one hand instruct us to, "not be drunk with wine", and at the same time create enough one to do exactly that to everyone at the wedding feast.
Peace.
Where does this concept of non-alcoholic wine come from? Non-wine drinkers I would guess. In those days most people including children drank alcoholic wine and beer for safety reasons. Beer was the staple drink of the UK until 150 years ago.Aqualung said:and the fact that they had drinken (what the heck is the past participle of to drink?) so much of the wine before hand, that the fact they weren't all passed out meant that it wan't alcoholic either.
I have read your reply again, and I would guess from it that you do not drink wine. 'New wine' does not mean fruit juice. New wine is a common expression within the wine trade for young wine. The liquor is not called wine until it has been through the fermentation process.EEWRED said:I am pretty sure that in the occation in which Jesus turned water into wine, it was non-alcoholic wine that was made by him. I say this for two reasons:
1) The reference is for "New Wine" which means new from the grape, which would not have had time to ferment, and therefore not contain alcohol.
2) If the wine created was alcoholic, it would have been equivalent to a couple of kegs of alcoholic substance, and would be liked to having a massive keg party, and allow everyone to be drunk. I find it hard to believe that the Lord would on one hand instruct us to, "not be drunk with wine", and at the same time create enough one to do exactly that to everyone at the wedding feast.
Peace.
So why do some Christian groups forbid it?Malus01 said:The Bible makes it clear that Jesus drank wine (Matthew 15:11 and approved of its moderate consumption (Matthew 15:11). On the other hand, he was critical of drunkenness (Luke 21:34, 12:42; Matthew 24:45-51).
because they make their own rules not based on the bible ..sorry i am butting in i am gone nowMerlin said:So why do some Christian groups forbid it?
If it was good enough for Jesus, why is it not good enough for we mere mortals?
fair enough, it just seems strange to copy a particular event in the Bible, but modify it. Maybe people in your circumstances should move to the continental view. They let the priest drink the wine, and they just share the bread.CaptainXeroid said:Since the purpose of communion is to remember Jesus' sacrifice, the drink we choose to symbolize the Last Supper really isn't relevant is it?
Our church switched from wine to grape juice 30 years ago when there were some members who were recovering alcholics.
Doesn't every sub-sect of Christianity do that? But presumably your own group is the exception to that.may said:because they make their own rules not based on the bible ..sorry i am butting in i am gone now
i am not pointing to any one group its just that the scriptures do not say acholic drinks are wrong , but the bible does tell us that drunkeness is wrong there is a big differance,Merlin said:Doesn't every sub-sect of Christianity do that? But presumably your own group is the exception to that.
Please feel free to butt in whenever you wish
Not all Christian accept that, so you cannot be so definite as you appearmay said:yes i agree that Jesus did drink acholic wine ,and it is also ok for christians to drink it in moderation