Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Similar references are found in early Jewish and Christian poetry. Maybe Joseph plagiarized from one of these instead:Yes, that is the one.
And, as has already been mentioned, Job.Similar references are found in early Jewish and Christian poetry. Maybe Joseph plagiarized from one of these instead:Descent of Inanna"Why, pray, have you come to the 'Land of no return,' on the road whose traveller returns never?"Pyramid Texts"May you go on the roads of the western ones [the dead]; They who go on them [travellers] do not return."Harris Papyrus"There is nobody who returns from there.""Behold there is nobody who has gone, who has returned."
It's like your boat issue you had before. The BoM claims that nobody else at the time in that area knew how to build such a boat. Nobody else at that time in that area knew how to build such a boat. Whowouldathunk?So what, what ?
but since we really have no idea how the actual translation happened, that's another dead end.
I always find it a bit funny when people say "well, ol' Joe just copied from the Bible and Shakesphere". Well, fine, but where did he get the other 95% of the book from then?
Then it's easy - God wanted the wording to be the same as the KJV. Problem solvedThe suits at the Church Office Building should use this picture to help people get a glimpse into the so-called translation of the so-called ancient record. :slap:
Joseph Smith would put the seer stone into a hat, and put his face in the hat, drawing it closely around his face to exclude the light; and in the darkness the spiritual light would shine. A piece of something resembling parchment would appear, and on that appeared the writing. One character at a time would appear, and under it was the interpretation in English. Brother Joseph would read off the English to Oliver Cowdery, who was his principal scribe, and when it was written down and repeated to Brother Joseph to see if it was correct, then it would disappear, and another character with the interpretation would appear. Thus the Book of Mormon was translated by the gift and power of God, and not by any power of man. (David Whitmer, An Address to All Believers in Christ,, 1887, p. 12.)
I bet he had a ghost writter. :help:
Then it's easy - God wanted the wording to be the same as the KJV. Problem solved
No fair, you were already prepared for my example.Similar references are found in early Jewish and Christian poetry. Maybe Joseph plagiarized from one of these instead:Descent of Inanna"Why, pray, have you come to the 'Land of no return,' on the road whose traveller returns never?"Pyramid Texts"May you go on the roads of the western ones [the dead]; They who go on them [travellers] do not return."Harris Papyrus"There is nobody who returns from there.""Behold there is nobody who has gone, who has returned."
Yup. It sure is.LMAO, golly gee, aint it grand how a testimonkey works!
but since we really have no idea how the actual translation happened
Or, you could say that David Whitmer was lying about it, but if you believed that - why would you bring it up?
It was written in one language, Joseph Smith provided it in English. I'd say that counts as "translating", no matter what the process was.I don't know who is lying, but if one thinks the book of mormon is a fiction then one might conclude somebody is full of crap. I think lds-inc should stop saying ol joe translated the so-called ancient record and start saying that he dictated from words appearing on magical stones, ya know, since there really wasnt any translating actually taking place. Now it is your turn to spin.
I'd say that counts as "translating", no matter what the process was.
Of course you would, you have to twist it to conform to the thing in which you have invested so much.
What I don't understand about the "translation" process is, if Joseph received the translation by revelation, what was the point of the golden plates being revealed to him, and his showing them to other people, and all that?
Source data, please. I'd like to look it up. Can you quote the passage for us?
I have no idea.What I don't understand about the "translation" process is, if Joseph received the translation by revelation, what was the point of the golden plates being revealed to him, and his showing them to other people, and all that?
And why don't Mormons use seer stones today?
The Golden Plates, of course.What exactly was ol joe translating if he was looking at a rock in a hat?
I'm not twisting anything.Of course you would, you have to twist it to conform to the thing in which you have invested so much.
The Golden Plates, of course.