Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Just remember he didn't write any emails. Why is transparency a problem?For releasing the DNC emails hacked by the Russians that threw the election for Trump.
Just remember he didn't write any emails. Why is transparency a problem?
Just remember he didn't write any emails. Why is transparency a problem?
We finally agree on something!As I said in a previous post, this is bigger than Trump.
We used to have freedom of the press.
No-one is saying he's jolly good fellow, or that his integrity is beyond reproach. They want to try him for his role in helping Chelsea Manning expose what was at least sickening murder and at worst war crimes. We (as in the people of the world) can't have that.Very interesting talk, especially the part where he says Assange has access to all this information but only selectively releases things based on his own personal agenda;
'Assange smeared faeces in our embassy'
The indictment is all about the Chelsea Manning leak. That's why they have Manning in prison again, because she refuses to testify against her source.Criminals have to be assessed on everything they did, not just one case.
He should be tried for rape if the Swedish prosecutor says so.There's also the rape charges being brought up again in Sweden.
We finally agree on something!
Honestly there isn't anything there. But you do understand the difference right?Well then I suggest you release all your private emails, or is that going to be a problem??
The indictment is all about the Chelsea Manning leak. That's why they have Manning in prison again, because she refuses to testify against her source.
From the wiki:Nope. Manning is in jail for her demands for a public hearing as the only way she will testify. She broke the law, simple as that.
From the wiki:
On March 8, 2019, Manning was held in contempt of court by a United States District Court judge and jailed in Alexandria, Virginia for refusing to testify to a grand jury investigating WikiLeaks. Manning said she refuses to testify because she objects to the secrecy of the grand jury process, and already revealed everything she knows at her court martial. The judge ordered her to remain in jail until Manning testifies or until the grand jury concludes its work.[10]
I said she's in prison for refusing to testify. You said 'nope'. Wiki says 'yep'. No?What did I just say....... Read you own source....
I said she's in prison for refusing to testify. You said 'nope'. Wiki says 'yep'. No?
Oh. Aye, fair enough. That was a bit of a brain fart on my behalf.You didn't read your source, your own post nor what you linked.. She said no to the closed grand jury as one of her objections. The other objection has no merit. She said nothing about protecting her source
Chelsea E. Manning on Twitter
"That's why they have Manning in prison again, because she refuses to testify against her source."
Never happened. Especially as she claims she told the government everything already. How do you protect a source when you have told government everything you already know? Think about it.....
This is very ironic coming from someone who hates Assange.trump is the most anti Freedom Of The Press President we have had in recent memory