Pah
Uber all member
Well, his premise is mistaken. A religion, defined by constutional law, is one that says it is, has a modicum of organization and, sad to say, I've forgotten the third essential characteristic. Secularism has neither of those two but just the first is sufficent to deny his premise.Melody said:His view was that by actively removing any mention of God from any public arena, the government was actually enforcing a human secularism...which he considered just as much a religion.
As for discussing with my professor. I would guess he's long since retiredn;-).
But I would be glad to debate the question with anyone.