• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Justice

Fool

ALL in all
Premium Member
Is being Just, the ultimate form of righteousness and love?

Noah was righteous
Job was righteous

Your righteousness is like the highest mountains, your justice like the great deep. You, Lord, preserve both people and animals.

The Lord loves righteousness and justice; the earth is full of his unfailing love.

Righteousness and justice are the foundation of your throne; love and faithfulness go before you.
 

pearl

Well-Known Member
Righteousness and justice are the foundation of your throne; love and faithfulness go before you.

Amos would agree with you.

Take away from me

your noisy songs;

The melodies of your harps,

I will not listen to them.

Rather let justice surge like waters,

and righteousness like an unfailing stream.
 

CogentPhilosopher

Philosophy Student
Is being Just, the ultimate form of righteousness and love?

Noah was righteous
Job was righteous

Your righteousness is like the highest mountains, your justice like the great deep. You, Lord, preserve both people and animals.

The Lord loves righteousness and justice; the earth is full of his unfailing love.

Righteousness and justice are the foundation of your throne; love and faithfulness go before you.

Anything other than unfounded assertions?
 

CogentPhilosopher

Philosophy Student
i'm asking a question. that isn't an assertion.

assertion etymology

assertion definition

Is being Just, the ultimate form of righteousness and love?

Noah was righteous
Job was righteous

Your righteousness is like the highest mountains, your justice like the great deep. You, Lord, preserve both people and animals.

The Lord loves righteousness and justice; the earth is full of his unfailing love.

Righteousness and justice are the foundation of your throne; love and faithfulness go before you.[
/QUOTE]

You should have reread your post before making a fool of yourself.

No pun intended.
 

CogentPhilosopher

Philosophy Student
i don't mind appearing to be foolish.

all the statements after the initial question are from the bible.

ad hominems don't disprove/prove anything

I was meaning it as advice with a snarky tone.

You quoting from the bible as an authority without proving the legitimacy of such authority is useless.
 

Fool

ALL in all
Premium Member
I was meaning it as advice with a snarky tone.

You quoting from the bible as an authority without proving the legitimacy of such authority is useless.

i've heard it said that the bible, like many holy books, are like a rorschach test. kind of like scientist squabbling over data from observations. it's open to interpretation and conjecture.

the bible is also considered by some as a series of books on the idea of God and consciousness, or mindfulness.

i never once considered myself as authoritative. i did consider asking a question on a possibility.

socratic questioning isn't claiming. you're fixated on a speaker and ignoring the ideas.
 

CogentPhilosopher

Philosophy Student
i've heard it said that the bible, like many holy books, are like a rorschach test. kind of like scientist squabbling over data from observations. it's open to interpretation and conjecture.

So you think that giving humans a rorschach test as a system of morals is a good idea?

Also thank you for establishing that you do not understand how meta-analysis works.
 

Fool

ALL in all
Premium Member
So you think that giving humans a rorschach test as a system of morals is a good idea?

you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink; especially if it isn't thirsty, or you do so against its will. giving someone an aptitude test determines where they are at in a process.

Also thank you for establishing that you do not understand how meta-analysis works.
there are no absolutes in science.
 

CogentPhilosopher

Philosophy Student
you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink; especially if it isn't thirsty, or you do so against its will.

Sorry but that is a false equivalency. This would be like leading a human to a room with an illogical puzzle with an invisible person behind him who will light him on fire if he does not solve the puzzle the way he wants him to. And to top it all of the invisible person made the experiment and also demands that the man solving puzzle praise him for it. But worse

giving someone an aptitude test determines where they are at in a process.

:facepalm:

The test we where talking about is NOT an aptitude test. There are no right or wrong answers.

there are no absolutes in science.

Assertions made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
 

Fool

ALL in all
Premium Member
Sorry but that is a false equivalency. This would be like leading a human to a room with an illogical puzzle with an invisible person behind him who will light him on fire if he does not solve the puzzle the way he wants him to. And to top it all of the invisible person made the experiment and also demands that the man solving puzzle praise him for it. But worse
thats one interpretation but it's not the only one. consider it more like a goal that allows a person to move forward/backward in the game based on their level of skills and intervals of rest, study, and contemplation in the between.

case in point, the bible, like many holy writs, discuss ideas about the cause, nature, and actions of mind. neuroscience can't explain certain aspects of consciousness. it can express the physical processes. panpsychism is seeing a resurgence as the explanation of consciousness.

Is Consciousness Universal?



The test we where talking about is NOT an aptitude test. There are no right or wrong answers.
the test you have been discussing might not. not all aptitude tests have right or wrong answers unless you're taking a career goal test.

some just determine what career would most likely be the best for you. not everyone will choose what is in their best interest.

What Career is Right For Me?
 

Fool

ALL in all
Premium Member
Scientific articles please.

Not to mention your claim was that there are things about conciousness that we can't know not don't know.


can't know because we don't have the means to empirically measure.

like we can't know the subjective experience of a monkey, another human, the reason a stimulus is pleasant/painful to another and the opposite for someone else.

the reason a brain isn't necessary for consciousness.

Plant Intelligence: An Overview | BioScience | Oxford Academic

The roots of plant intelligence

Bacterial Intelligence - Astrobiology Magazine

 
Top