People. Doctrines. Teachings. Who cares?I'd like to believe that weeds are not people. Is that OK with you?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
People. Doctrines. Teachings. Who cares?I'd like to believe that weeds are not people. Is that OK with you?
It is the difference between hating the person and hating the sin.People. Doctrines. Teachings. Who cares?
Yep. They are. Gnostic Arians to the core. You combine both Church defined heresies into one religion.
Nah. Even the Coptic Pope in Egypt, who occupies the See of St Mark the Apostle, states that JW's are Gnostic Arians. Now go and find all of the bad things that the Orthodox Coptic Church has done and report back to us.And this is the view of the Catholic Church is it
They're only heresies according to JW's, which hold no weight for Christians. Jesus approved of the apostolic/talmidic teaching system used by the Church. You don't have it. And never will. You are the fathers Jesus spoke about.What about the heresies of your own church masquerading as Christ's teachings?
I don't judge where people go nor do I care. They choose.If you who harbor a false doctrine declare that weeds are people who will be thrown into the fire, guess where you're going?
The Bible says the weeds are burned up. Do you argue The Bible?I don't judge where people go nor do I care. They choose.
BTW. How about Purgatory? God's time-out for his disobedient children?
It is the difference between hating the person and hating the sin.
Weed are false doctrines. It seems everyone is harboring some false doctrine. If you who harbor a false doctrine declare that weeds are people (who will be thrown into the fire says The Bible) , guess where you're going?
It has no direct meaning for me because I don't get to preach.The Bible says the weeds are burned up. Do you argue The Bible?
And why is that?It has no direct meaning for me because I don't get to preach.
I don't get to preach my interpretation of doctrine to people. Not allowed by Jesus.And why is that?
I think you mean your interpretation of what is written. Acts of the Apostles 17:11 Doctrine is an interpretation.I don't get to preach my interpretation of doctrine to people. Not allowed by Jesus.
Read down a little further. I don't get to preach. Only the Apostles and their successors. That's the system Jesus used. Notice they don't follow the teachings of Jesus.I think you mean your interpretation of what is written. Acts of the Apostles 17:11 Doctrine is an interpretation.
For JW's this is not a doctrine but a belief. Since the Bible only infers it, we hold that it seems to be true, but we will not stake our lives on it, nor would it matter in the big scheme of things if Jesus proved not to be Michael. Nothing changes in our belief system one way or the other. We have ascertained from scripture that various scriptures seem to point to it.
The only doctrine that stands in the way of people accepting that Jesus is also Michael, is the trinity and it is not biblical.
Read down a little further. I don't get to preach. Only the Apostles and their successors. That's the system Jesus used. Notice they don't follow the teachings of Jesus.
The Father hands off to the Son. The Son hands off to the Apostles. The Apostles hand off to their successors. That's the system.
42 And they continued steadfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.
The Father hands off to the Son. The Son hands off to the Apostles. The Apostles hand off to their successors. That's the system.
If you follow the words of Jesus, yes. They're called bishops.So there should be apostles preaching today?
Psalms 146:3If you follow the words of Jesus, yes. They're called bishops.
Why are you spam bashing this thread with this idiocy?
You're Christian? And Christians behave and approve of this child's play?