I never claimed to be a christian
This is just becoming like a troll... The word usage affiliation is to make a claim, therefore you are no longer making that claim by not being affiliated with it...
Never thought you were Christian, just you're no longer claiming to be one...
You're the one contradicting yourself, and I'm just trying to help you see it; so arguing against me, is just going around in circles.
Are you referring to the rapture?
There is no such thing scriptually as the Rapture, it is heavily based on Paul's bad wording.
The people who are removed, are the ones who who are saved, not the other way around.
See this is what i mean, that is so Christianized it is shocking...
Isaiah 34, Isaiah 24, Daniel 12:1-3, Zechariah 13:2, Ezekiel 34:25 the Ravenous beings are to be removed as Yeshua references, "where the body is there the vultures gather" (Luke 17:34-37) is referring to all interlinking statements in the prophets... The wicked are to be removed.
The world is essentially destroyed after the rapture.
The world can stay, and will be remade after all the demons are removed, who just want to make war.... The meek/humble inherit the earth.
Israel doesn't mean the second temple.
Ask questions rather than make statements; it is embarrassing...
Paul makes the statement that the Gentiles are grafted onto the House of Israel; that first Jew then Gentile...
This is wishful thinking by Paul's Pharisaic ideas, as in Zechariah 11:10, and Zechariah 11:14, the covenant is nullified with both Judah and Israel at the 2nd Temple destruction.
Since the concept Karma is associated with is inseparable from the teaching of incarnation, this cannot be a Christian concept
Reincarnation was taught by the Christian church until 533AD; as Yeshua taught it by saying John the Baptist was Elijah, and his disciples believed it as Judaism still does (
Gilgul)....
You do realize
reincarnation has been scientifically proven with children born with memories of past lifes, that have then been verified.
Within Gilgul just like in Karmic understanding, the more righteous you are, the better the chances...
The wicked are not raised in each, which is where the concepts of death being final come from in scripture, it is for those God doesn't raise up.
added an oral tradition to it called Q
There isn't a Q source, there is no evidence for it; only someone who hasn't studied the text carefully enough could stick with such a conclusion, as each account has far to many variances, individual writing styles, and inclusions... If they were a copy, there would be far more similarities.
Paul is better as it comes earlier
OK just stick with your illogical statements you made earlier regardless of facts presented.
The fall of the second temple means nothing to me.
Because you're totally oblivious to all the interlinking passages prophesying it precisely, and thus you've got a Rorschach drawing you're making guesses about.
As far as I am concerned Jesus was a devout man who mistakenly thought he was heralding the world renewing arrival of God's kingdom and got killed.
Again just such limited info, if you would like to be better educated ask me, and will help you understand it...
Yeshua didn't think he was bringing in the Kingdom of God then, he was saying it had come to them, and if they knew what was being offered they'd not have denied him...
The prophecies specified by the Tanakh are ongoing for thousands of years from his first appearance.
His followers used some sorrow induced hallucinations and rumors that he had risen from the dead, to continue the movement and move it into a new direction.
Actually that whole concept is prophesied by Daniel as being the Abomination (idolatry) of Desolation (Daniel 9:26-27), that came after his death...
Simon the stone (petros) started it (Zechariah 3:9), and then the whole church has been built upon that faulty premise.