Kashmir valley flooded

[Aupmanyav]

One to one, they are nice. Get them in a crowd, and they are ..... One even assured me a marriage with the most beautiful woman if I agreed to have the skin cut (he was impressed by what I knew of Qur'an and early caliphs). But many things may change in the next elections.

 

[Aupmanyav]

Mys sister's rented GF accommodation in Srinagar must be completely destroyed as the waters reached first floor. They are from Jammu. My brother who was visiting (expecting a fabulous weather) passed the 10 days on a neighbor's second floor. They were left with just one liter bottle of drinking water. They come to Delhi today.

 

[Atman]

Haha the same pigs who chant "Hindustan murdabad" and "pakistan zindabad" are now crying for Indias help. The same individuals who throw stones and pellets at Indian officers daily and now begging for help. The same muslims who killed Hindus and forced them out of their home lands and now crying for help.

You know for a fact that all those affected by the flood are separatists? They have all killed Hindus? Yours is the mind of tribalist, the justification for genocide and ethnic conflict. I reiterate God help you, for you're certainly lost in darkness and ignorance like none other.

 

[Aupmanyav]

My sister's rented GF accommodation in Srinagar must be completely destroyed as the waters reached first floor.

No, they were able to move their things to the first floor with the owner of the house in time. They escaped any loss. Good.

 

[Poeticus]

More wonderful news about Kashyapa's Valley:

Why Jammu and Kashmir should not have a Hindu CM - Hindustan Times

For Hindus of the West, pretend someone said that City A should have a White mayor instead of an African-American mayor; or that City B should only have a male mayor and not a female mayor. Yeah, that's practically what this article is saying; the analogy is different but the logic is the same. Therefore, my dear Hindus that reside with me in the West, have I done enough to explain what "Indo-secularism" is? I would appreciate if ya'll can reply so I understand that you understand what I'm trying to explain here.

Oh, and check this out. It's from the article:

The Hindus have grouses. They feel discriminated against in all matters. They yearn for a rightful place in political decision-making, administration and equal development of their areas. The tragedy is that all central governments, right from that of Jawaharlal Nehru to Narendra Modi, have taken them for granted. They are used to advance the national interest and further the agenda of saving Kashmir for the country.

All this holds true. But still having a Hindu chief minister is bound to have an inevitable backlash from the majority community in the elections and consolidate the allegations that India wants to go in for the demographic change in the state. The issue of a Hindu CM could be a political game for the BJP and Congress ahead of the polls but its ramifications are bound to be more serious than mere political one-upmanship.

It’s a recognised fact that Jammu and Kashmir is a Muslim-majority state. The international attention on the state is much more than on any other state. Handing the post to a non-Muslim would give credence to the charges that a systematic plan is on to undermine the Muslim identity, which they have closely identified with Kashmiri identity, with the Kashmiri Pandits and Kashmiri Sikhs being usually out of the purview of the definition of Kashmiri identity.

Please re-read the highlighted portions. But yes, you read the latter highlighted portion correctly, "handing the post to a non-Muslim would give credence to the charges that a systematic plan is on to undermine the Muslim identity". Allow me to rephrase to put it in a light that Western Hindus can understand: "handing the post to a non-White/non-male would give credence to the charges that a systematic plan is on to undermine the White/male identity".

Don't be frightened, my friends. You are reading this correctly. This, my friends, is what goes on in the "intellectual" circles of Bharat. We Bharatiya Hindus, and conscious Hindus around the globe coming from various backgrounds, we who are familiar with what goes on in that "prodigious land", refer to this as Indo-secularism; and in this context, this is what we mean by leftist subversionism. But check out that very last part of the latter highlighted portion: "with the Kashmiri Pandits and Kashmiri Sikhs being usually out of the purview of the definition of Kashmiri identity".

This is akin to saying that an ethnic Egyptian Copt isn't really an Egyptian; or a Tutsi isn't really a Banyarwanda (and remember what happened to the Tutsis in 1994?); or that an ethnic German Jew isn't really German (the Holocaust, anyone?); or that the Native Americans aren't really American; or that ... you get the point, right?

Yes, and this, my friends, is what is seen as "progressive" in Bharat. I, personally, refer to such rubbish as pseudo-progressive, since it is in reality a mocking of actual progressive ideology. But just take a look at that last part once again. Kashmiri Pandits, who are ethnic Kashmiris belonging to various ethnolinguistic clans of Kashmiri background, are outside the definition of Kashmiri identity; Kashmiri Sikhs, many of whom are also ethnically Kashmiri as well as Punjabi Sikhs that have lived in the region for hundreds of years, are also outside the definition of Kashmiri identity. Can you imagine if the President of the United States were to say that Native Americans in, say, New Jersey, are outside the definition of American identity? I know, I know, that is more nationality-centric, and not ethnic-related. But you get the point, and if not, just go back to the "ethnic German" example as a substitute. Either way, pretty messed up, right?

 

[Aupmanyav]

Let us see. The elections are on despite Pakistani provocation and attempts to disturb (21 people died in terrorist acts a day before yesterday). Let us see whether Kashmir gets a Muslim Chief Minister or a Hindu one (could be one Jitender Singh from BJP). Kashmiris (that includes Hindus from Jammu region) are voting heavily, around 70%. Modi holds a rally at Sher-e-Kashmir Stadium, Srinagar, and at Anantnag on Dec. 9.