Kent State gun girl open carries on campus. The intolerant socialist left rears its ugly head.

[Laika]

Kent State gun girl Kaitlin Bennett faces protests at Ohio University

It doesn't do much good when somebody doesn't kill anybody doesn't it? It kind of deflates the issue.

So instead of the person with the weapon.....

.....the people without the weapons do the attacks.

Oh by the way, nobody died either to the extreme disappointment of the left, whom felt obligated to do all the damage themselves this time around.

The incident speaks volumes.

Socialists, much like liberals and conservatives, are a diverse bunch and are more than capable on disagreeing on anything. So, here's some Pro-Gun Socialist organisations for you.

Socialist Rifle Association
Red Neck Revolt

And here's the Socialist Rifles Association Reddit group. Perhaps drop in if you want to drop in and say hi and just ask what their views are.

Socialist Rifle Association

 

[Twilight Hue]

There is nothing anti-gun about Socialism.

I personally would feel unsafe if there was a student carrying an assault rifle. I’m from Australia though, and have never seen a gun in real life. I would not attack them though. That’s in poor taste.

Intolerant people is a problem all political ideologies share.

I can understand that. It's natural.

Anybody that carries a gun around would imply that the area they are in isn't exactly safe. Or they're hungry and looking for a meal. ;0)

The trick I think is in determining if such fears are well-founded or loosely grounded through indirect associations that occur elsewhere.

 

[Revoltingest]

There is nothing anti-gun about Socialism. .

It appears that socialist countries (eg, N Korea)
are pro-gun for the government only.
Ordinary citizens are denied gun ownership.
This is an emergent property of socialism.

Note that I refer to real socialist countries....not
the faux "socialism" of the Scandinavian Model.

 

[Twilight Hue]

Socialists, much like liberals and conservatives, are a diverse bunch and are more than capable on disagreeing on anything. So, here's some Pro-Gun Socialist organisations for you.

Socialist Rifle Association
Red Neck Revolt

And here's the Socialist Rifles Association Reddit group. Perhaps drop in if you want to drop in and say hi and just ask what their views are.

Socialist Rifle Association

You forgot the LGBT gun club...

 

[columbus]

Oh by the way, the preeminent socialist of the socialist Democrat party is Bernie Sanders.

You might want to get better educated about the U.S. political landscape.

Sanders isn't a Democrat.

The DNC let him run, pretending to be one, but he isn't. Has never been one. And he might run again under the Democrats banner, but it won't make him a Democrat.
Tom

 

[Twilight Hue]

You might want to get better educated about the U.S. political landscape.

Sanders isn't a Democrat.

The DNC let him run, pretending to be one, but he isn't. Has never been one. And he might run again under the Democrats banner, but it won't make him a Democrat.
Tom

Well then I suppose the 'genuine' Democrats should oust Sanders post haste.

I'd be impressed if they did.

 

[Nakosis]

Kent State gun girl Kaitlin Bennett faces protests at Ohio University

It doesn't do much good when somebody doesn't kill anybody doesn't it? It kind of deflates the issue.

So instead of the person with the weapon.....

.....the people without the weapons do the attacks.

Oh by the way, nobody died either to the extreme disappointment of the left, whom felt obligated to do all the damage themselves this time around.

The incident speaks volumes.

If you're going to be an activist, probably ought to work with the police dept. At least notify them of your intent. Enough crazy folks about can't be sure about what is going to happen.

I'd suppose though she was wanting something to happen to make the news.

 

[Jeremiah Ames]

So, you're against the right to protest?

I find that most people are against whatever does not agree with their own ‘self’. If they cannot use reason and understanding to find out what is causing the ‘self’ a problem, they will find a group somewhere to be against.
Be it, democrats, republicans, liberals, conservatives, Mexicans, muslims, or?

 

[columbus]

Well then I suppose the 'genuine' Democrats should oust Sanders post haste.

I'd be impressed if they did.

There are those of us who aren't as partisan as you are, and still believe in American values.
Not just any crap Trump and the TeaParty tell you to believe.
Tom

 

[Heyo]

Oh by the way, the preeminent socialist of the socialist Democrat party is Bernie Sanders.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...8266a4-5280-11ea-929a-64efa7482a77_story.html

The vindication in lieu of such an assessment relating to ignorance.

And Sanders is the one social democrat who is least interested in gun legislation. He has bigger fish to fry.

 

[Twilight Hue]

If you're going to be an activist, probably ought to work with the police dept. At least notify them of your intent. Enough crazy folks about can't be sure about what is going to happen.

I'd suppose though she was wanting something to happen to make the news.

Of course.

Activists, no matter what issue, always go for maximum impact.

I'm thinking she wanted to expose the incredibly short fuse of the intolerant left whenever they're directly faced with opposing ideology, to establish the fact that in spite of what's being said are not truly an open or tolerant people.

Rather effectively exposing the fact that they're like anyone else when it comes to the bottom line they imply, versus the one they actually hide until it's crossed.

 

[Revoltingest]

You might want to get better educated kabout the U.S. political landscape.

Sanders isn't a Democrat.

The DNC let him run, pretending to be one, but he isn't. Has never been one. And he might run again under the Democrats banner, but it won't make him a Democrat.

You're not entirely accurate.
He has come & gone from the party.
The only question is whether he's a member at the moment.
He does appear to be.
Ref....
Bernie Sanders - Wikipedia

His party status became ambiguous once again in March 2019 when he signed a formal "loyalty pledge" to the Democratic Party stating that he is a member of the party and will serve as a Democrat if elected president. He signed the pledge the day after he signed paperwork to run as an independent for reelection to the Senate in 2024.[1]

One might say that he is "party fluid".

 

[Twilight Hue]

There are those of us who aren't as partisan as you are, and still believe in American values.
Not just any crap Trump and the TeaParty tell you to believe.
Tom

Oh I doubt that. The socialist left establishes that assessment more and more everyday.

Sanders notable lead proves and confirms everything in spectacular fashion.

You vote for Sanders well, you're a socialist.

 

[columbus]

And Sanders is the one social democrat who is least interested in gun legislation. He has bigger fish to fry.

I so wish that people of integrity, like Sanders and Romney, weren't forced by the USA political system to kowtow to the Demopublican party.
Tom

 

[Nakosis]

I find that most people are against whatever does not agree with their own ‘self’. If they cannot use reason and understanding to find out what is causing the ‘self’ a problem, they will find a group somewhere to be against.
Be it, democrats, republicans, liberals, conservatives, Mexicans, muslims, or?

It's usually fear IMO. In this case fear of people with guns. Personally I've no fear about people with guns, I suppose having been around them at a early age. No more fear than a person driving about with a car. Either if they wanted to could cause me great harm.

 

[Revoltingest]

Oh I doubt that. The socialist left establishes that assessment more and more everyday.

Sanders notable lead proves and confirms everything in spectacular fashion.

Liberals hate it when you use the term,
"socialist", in the same manner they do.
I'm the only one who is pure.

 

[Twilight Hue]

Liberals hate it when you use the term,
"socialist", in the same manner they do.
I'm the only one who is pure.

It's hard not to in lieu of the aggressive and compulsory Nanny state (frog slowly being boiled alive) mechanism and the open affiliation of the DSA, as well as the CPUSA mirroring the same exact ideologies of today's socialist Democrats and putting their backing behind them instead of backing their own candidates.

Sounds like a merger to me.

 

[columbus]

Liberals hate it when you use the term,
"socialist", in the same manner they do.
I'm the only one who is pure.

I rated this post winner, because you exemplify the Republocratic standards.
Tom

 

[Revoltingest]

It's hard not to in lieu of the Nanny state (frog slowly being boiled alive) mechanism and the open affiliation of the DSA, as well as the CPUSA mirroring the same exact ideologies of today's socialist Democrats and putting their backing behind them instead of backing their own candidates.

Sounds like a merger to me.

I do agree though that they want to send us in the direction
of more socialism by taking more control of the economy.

 

[Revoltingest]

I rated this post winner, because you exemplify the Republocratic standards.
Tom

No, I use the term very differently from them.
Were you a careful reader, you'd see this.

Reject tribalism!