Copernicus
Industrial Strength Linguist
It sounds to me like the "demonstrators" were creating a dangerous situation that no one was really equipped or trained to handle.
The demonstrations were going on continually before Nixon expanded the war, but his announcement on April 30 had very predictable consequences. There had been hope for a peace settlement leading up to that event. Since the police and National Guard were not really trained or equipped for crowd control, they only exacerbated the danger. The frequent attacks on crowds of chanting demonstrators and their tactic of trying to push them away with unsheathed bayonets and tear gas got so bad that much of the faculty and student body called off classes on campus. Our classes that were not cancelled were held in the homes of professors. Ultimately, the campus had to be shut down for the remainder of the quarter.
Maybe I'm stupid but they call that a strike? I call it a riot. A strike is the organized withholding of labor from an employer as a negotiating tool. And how does someone "strike" a university? Are they striking against their parents who are paying tuition, or against the government for subsidizing it.
Students call a strike by walking out of classes and the faculty ended up largely supporting them after the Kent State shootings. This had nothing to do with parents paying tuition or subsidies from the government. It had to do with the government forcibly conscripting young men in order to meet manpower requirements and the public seeing all those body bags and the horrors of war from the front lines. Because Nixon's act actually made the situation worse in Vietnam, student deferments were ended in 1971, but students who graduated were often forcibly drafted before then after their undergraduate education ended.
To repeat myself, it sounds to me like the "demonstrators" were creating a dangerous situation that no one was really equipped or trained to handle. Were they going to destroy property and the right of uninvolved students to learn and take final exams?
It may seem sensible to blame the students for their behavior, but you have to understand that riots are never planned by demonstrators. They can be triggered by radicals intent on stirring up trouble or government agents provocateurs intent on infiltrating the movement and discrediting it. We had both in those days. Most people who join demonstrations do so to express their frustration, not to destroy property or harm security deployed to maintain order. That happens as emotions build and people on both sides get angry and frightened. There are always a few people who will start throwing things and acting in a provocative way, so crowd control requires a great deal of discipline and fortitude by government forces. Neither the police nor the Guard had much of that, but they did believe that a display of force would cause the demonstrators to sober up and settle down. It had the opposite effect. Firing tear gas at a crowd can disperse them, but more and more of the retreating crowd will start trying to retaliate by throwing rocks or picking up canisters and flinging them back at the people firing them.
Last edited: