Legitimate Disproof of Evolution

[questfortruth]

Dear Scientist, I ask you to give full consideration to the research manuscript I submit to you and to start the review process. This simply gives you the chance to reveal talents given to me, as I am not dumb like millions of similar non-prominent and unfamiliar submitters. I have completed the secondary school with the Gold Medal, Tartu University with Cum Laude, and I have successfully published in Physical Review E and European Physical Journal B.

The title was deliberately made arrogant, to catch public attention. However,
what is necessary is the reconciliation between Science and Faith, because
Science has not the goal to make religious people uncomfortable. Note that the
sincere account of Evolution does not provide an alternative to the religious
account of creation.

God is called our Father: Christians pray ``Our Father,...''; thus, He is our
common ancestor, common to every item in our reality: God am the Father of the
cats and me, and the Sun (but not through sexual intercourse); and God am the
Father of the Son (Jesus).

In the modern text-book description of Evolution, there are no transitional
forms. It means, monkeys have not produced ``semi-monkeys'', who produced the
humans. But the common ancestor of all monkeys is called God, and the common
ancestor of all humans is called God. God is the name of the ``most recent
common ancestor'' between humans and monkeys.

Yes, in modern Evolution there are many common ancestors. But these are seen
as the creative actions of one single common ancestor: God.

The ongoing discussion of this at the professional science:
Legitimate Disproof of Evolution

 

[Secret Chief]

God am the Father of the
cats

Cats? Did you mean monkeys?

In the modern text-book description of Evolution, there are no transitional
forms. It means, monkeys have not produced ``semi-monkeys'', who produced the
humans. But the common ancestor of all monkeys is called God, and the common
ancestor of all humans is called God. God is the name of the ``most recent
common ancestor'' between humans and monkeys.

Head. Bang. Wall.
Apes. Not monkeys.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.

 

[exchemist]

Dear Scientist, I ask you to give full consideration to the research manuscript I submit to you and to start the review process. This simply gives you the chance to reveal talents given to me, as I am not dumb like millions of similar non-prominent and unfamiliar submitters. I have completed the secondary school with the Gold Medal, Tartu University with Cum Laude, and I have successfully published in Physical Review E and European Physical Journal B.

The title was deliberately made arrogant, to catch public attention. However,
what is necessary is the reconciliation between Science and Faith, because
Science has not the goal to make religious people uncomfortable. Note that the
sincere account of Evolution does not provide an alternative to the religious
account of creation.

God is called our Father: Christians pray ``Our Father,...''; thus, He is our
common ancestor, common to every item in our reality: God am the Father of the
cats and me, and the Sun (but not through sexual intercourse); and God am the
Father of the Son (Jesus).

In the modern text-book description of Evolution, there are no transitional
forms. It means, monkeys have not produced ``semi-monkeys'', who produced the
humans. But the common ancestor of all monkeys is called God, and the common
ancestor of all humans is called God. God is the name of the ``most recent
common ancestor'' between humans and monkeys.

Yes, in modern Evolution there are many common ancestors. But these are seen
as the creative actions of one single common ancestor: God.

The ongoing discussion of this at the professional science:
Legitimate Disproof of Evolution

This is daft rubbish of course, but one point deserves comment for the sake of casual readers, namely the false assertion that there are no transitional forms.

On the contrary, all forms are transitional, in that evolution is constantly applicable to all forms of life, whenever the environment favours the reproductive success of some members of a population more than others. There are, thus, no "final" forms, of anything that lives.

As far as transitions between previously well-recognised examples are concerned, I have a book listing over 200 transitional fossils, lying between pairs of forms that lived at different times. (Robert J Asher, "Evolution and Belief", pp. 144-149.) And those are just some examples.

 

[questfortruth]

This is daft rubbish of course, but one point deserves comment for the sake of casual readers, namely the false assertion that there are no transitional forms.

On the contrary, all forms are transitional,

Why then there are no such ones on this diagram? Look:

 

[questfortruth]

all forms are transitional

 

[Altfish]

Why then there are no such ones on this diagram? Look:

I think it was Dawkins who pointed out that every time a new transitional fosil is discovered the number of gaps in the fossil record increases.

eg

Fossil 1 ......Gap..... Fossil 2

Then we fill the gap with a new fossil find so we have ...

Fossil 1 ... Gap ... Fossil 3 ... Gap ... Fossil 2

Every living thing is a transitional fossil - I am a transitional creature between my father and my son.

 

[ChristineM]

Dear Scientist, I ask you to give full consideration to the research manuscript I submit to you and to start the review process. This simply gives you the chance to reveal talents given to me, as I am not dumb like millions of similar non-prominent and unfamiliar submitters. I have completed the secondary school with the Gold Medal, Tartu University with Cum Laude, and I have successfully published in Physical Review E and European Physical Journal B.

The title was deliberately made arrogant, to catch public attention. However,
what is necessary is the reconciliation between Science and Faith, because
Science has not the goal to make religious people uncomfortable. Note that the
sincere account of Evolution does not provide an alternative to the religious
account of creation.

God is called our Father: Christians pray ``Our Father,...''; thus, He is our
common ancestor, common to every item in our reality: God am the Father of the
cats and me, and the Sun (but not through sexual intercourse); and God am the
Father of the Son (Jesus).

In the modern text-book description of Evolution, there are no transitional
forms. It means, monkeys have not produced ``semi-monkeys'', who produced the
humans. But the common ancestor of all monkeys is called God, and the common
ancestor of all humans is called God. God is the name of the ``most recent
common ancestor'' between humans and monkeys.

Yes, in modern Evolution there are many common ancestors. But these are seen
as the creative actions of one single common ancestor: God.

The ongoing discussion of this at the professional science:
Legitimate Disproof of Evolution

Spoiler: One comment

Sheesh

Transitional fossil.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Dear Scientist, I ask you to give full consideration to the research manuscript I submit to you and to start the review process.

This is a religious forum.

In the modern text-book description of Evolution, there are no transitional
forms. It means, monkeys have not produced ``semi-monkeys'', who produced the
humans

Perhaps first learn the basics of the theory of evolution before trying to talk about it.

The ongoing discussion of this at the professional science:
Legitimate Disproof of Evolution

Care to summarize the key points?

 

[epronovost]

How is this sort of rubbish idiocy not considered SPAM or proselytism?

 

[icehorse]

The title was deliberately made arrogant, to catch public attention. However,
what is necessary is the reconciliation between Science and Faith, because
Science has not the goal to make religious people uncomfortable. Note that the
sincere account of Evolution does not provide an alternative to the religious
account of creation.

Come on man! You know by now that there are many people on this forum who are fairly well acquainted with how the scientific process works and with what types of claims scientists make, and do not make. Do you really think you're gonna slip something like this past real scientists, or for that matter, even past us?

 

[ChristineM]

How is this sort of rubbish idiocy not considered SPAM or proselytism?

I did mention spam and pointed out the rules to him only a couple of days ago, obviously to no avail

 

[Valjean]

Why then there are no such ones on this diagram? Look:

Possibly for the same reason there are no transitional forms in this diagram:

Were these languages magically poofed into existence, fully formed?

 

[sun rise]

Come on man! You know by now that there are many people on this forum who are fairly well acquainted with how the scientific process works and with what types of claims scientists make, and do not make. Do you really think you're gonna slip something like this past real scientists, or for that matter, even past us?

And that includes theists who have no issue with evolution whatsoever.

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

Possibly for the same reason there are no transitional forms in this diagram:

Were these languages magically poofed into existence, fully formed?

Yes, of course -- all simultaneously invented and taught at the Tower of Babel. How could you not this know this obvious truth?

 

[metis]

Why then there are no such ones on this diagram? Look:

These diagrams are just simplistic charts to show different basic forms. They do serve a purpose but charts like that but they don't generally show many or most of the transitional forms.

Evolution stands to even the most basic common sense, namely that all material objects appear to change over time, and genes and chromosomes are material objects. We even see it today in the mutation of viruses, such as covid and flu viruses.

BTW, in no way does evolution negate God.

 

[The Hammer]

Cats? Did you mean monkeys?

At one point Cats were worshipped as Gods. I don't think they've forgotten.

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

At one point Cats were worshipped as Gods. I don't think they've forgotten.

Mine never did -- insisted on it right until the end!

 

[night912]

In the modern text-book description of Evolution,

It means, monkeys have not produced ``semi-monkeys'', who produced the
humans.

You don't get to tell the science community to dismiss The Theory of Evolution just because you got that one particular thing you said above, right about the theory.

 

[Twilight Hue]

At one point Cats were worshipped as Gods. I don't think they've forgotten.

I'm convinced fully my cat is a God.

 

[The Hammer]

I'm convinced fully my cat is a God.

Same, and I've got 4 of the buggers. My Dog as well. God backwards is Dog. I think there is something to that.