Legitimate Disproof of Evolution

[Subduction Zone]

Same, and I've got 4 of the buggers. My Dog as well. God backwards is Dog. I think there is something to that.

We have only 3. Well 3 and a half. One of male cat did not get snipped and is feral. Except for when he is desperate. Then he comes in for food. If he gets beaten up badly in his adventures he might even allow us to pet him at times, but that is a bad sign. The other three are fixed and know that they are God. Regardless of what the other cats think.

 

[John Schwartz]

Cats? Did you mean monkeys?
Discussing religion is fascinating. I’ve done it for so many years that I ended up writing a fictional book about the life of Jesus. It’s called The Lie That Changed The World. There have been lots of discussions about this book as it reveals the horrible things the Romans did and how their action affected Jesus. If interested you can read a bit about my book on my website

https://www.booksbyjohnschwartz.com




Head. Bang. Wall.
Apes. Not monkeys.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.
Head. Bang. Wall.

 

[John Schwartz]

Discussing religion is fascinating. I’ve done it for so many years that I ended up writing a fictional book about the life of Jesus. It’s called The Lie That Changed The World. There have been lots of discussions about this book as it reveals the horrible things the Romans did and how their action affected Jesus. There are no dogs or buggers in this book but there are many unique actions by Jesus before he dies at age 80. If interested you can read a bit about my book at my website

https://www.booksbyjohnschwartz.com

 

[Secret Chief]

I'm convinced fully my cat is a God.

One of our cats is a god, the other one thinks he's a mad ferret.

 

[Revoltingest]

Dear Scientist, I ask you to give full consideration to the research manuscript I submit to you and to start the review process. This simply gives you the chance to reveal talents given to me, as I am not dumb like millions of similar non-prominent and unfamiliar submitters. I have completed the secondary school with the Gold Medal, Tartu University with Cum Laude, and I have successfully published in Physical Review E and European Physical Journal B.

The title was deliberately made arrogant, to catch public attention. However,
what is necessary is the reconciliation between Science and Faith, because
Science has not the goal to make religious people uncomfortable. Note that the
sincere account of Evolution does not provide an alternative to the religious
account of creation.

God is called our Father: Christians pray ``Our Father,...''; thus, He is our
common ancestor, common to every item in our reality: God am the Father of the
cats and me, and the Sun (but not through sexual intercourse); and God am the
Father of the Son (Jesus).

In the modern text-book description of Evolution, there are no transitional
forms. It means, monkeys have not produced ``semi-monkeys'', who produced the
humans. But the common ancestor of all monkeys is called God, and the common
ancestor of all humans is called God. God is the name of the ``most recent
common ancestor'' between humans and monkeys.

Yes, in modern Evolution there are many common ancestors. But these are seen
as the creative actions of one single common ancestor: God.

The ongoing discussion of this at the professional science:
Legitimate Disproof of Evolution

That's an argument, but not a disproof.
Many intermediate forms have been found.
But there will always be an intermediate between
2 other intermediates. Fossilization is a rare
process (relative to the historic number of lives),
so we should expect some gaps in the fossil
record uncovered so far.
This documentary illustrates that issue...

 

[McBell]

Dear Scientist, I ask you to give full consideration to the research manuscript I submit to you and to start the review process. This simply gives you the chance to reveal talents given to me, as I am not dumb like millions of similar non-prominent and unfamiliar submitters. I have completed the secondary school with the Gold Medal, Tartu University with Cum Laude, and I have successfully published in Physical Review E and European Physical Journal B.

The title was deliberately made arrogant, to catch public attention. However,
what is necessary is the reconciliation between Science and Faith, because
Science has not the goal to make religious people uncomfortable. Note that the
sincere account of Evolution does not provide an alternative to the religious
account of creation.

God is called our Father: Christians pray ``Our Father,...''; thus, He is our
common ancestor, common to every item in our reality: God am the Father of the
cats and me, and the Sun (but not through sexual intercourse); and God am the
Father of the Son (Jesus).

In the modern text-book description of Evolution, there are no transitional
forms. It means, monkeys have not produced ``semi-monkeys'', who produced the
humans. But the common ancestor of all monkeys is called God, and the common
ancestor of all humans is called God. God is the name of the ``most recent
common ancestor'' between humans and monkeys.

Yes, in modern Evolution there are many common ancestors. But these are seen
as the creative actions of one single common ancestor: God.

The ongoing discussion of this at the professional science:
Legitimate Disproof of Evolution

 

[tas8831]

In the modern text-book description of Evolution, there are no transitional
forms.

Funny - I taught a class on evolution last semester and the textbook provided several such examples.

^^^^Legit disproof of supposed disproof of evolution.
So long!

 

[tas8831]

Why then there are no such ones on this diagram? Look:

Well, exchemist, he's totally got you there. I mean, no pictures on one diagram prove it...

Funny thing - my bible has no pictures of Jehovah in it. Whatever shall I conclude????

 

[NewGuyOnTheBlock]

In the modern text-book description of Evolution, there are no transitional
forms. It means, monkeys have not produced ``semi-monkeys'', who produced the
humans. But the common ancestor of all monkeys is called God, and the common
ancestor of all humans is called God. God is the name of the ``most recent
common ancestor'' between humans and monkeys.

1. Every species is a transitional species.
2. You do not understand evolution, which is probably why you fail to accept it as fact.

I would kindly refer you to (2) YouTube series which are very good at educating the indoctrinated on Evolution, from the perspective of those who have been subjected to Creationism. I implore you to take some time to view them.

One of the things you will learn from these videos is why a "monkey" producing a "semi-monkey" would not prove the theory of evolution, but completely unravel it.

 

[tas8831]

Delete nonsense 1 and 2

Darwin was wrong because nobody saw an ape turn into a human?

Is this really the limit of creation "science" and "logic" today?

Ok - nobody saw Yahweh turn silicates into a fully formed adult human male.

Creation DISPROVED!

 

[ecco]

Dear Scientist, I ask you to give full consideration to the research manuscript I submit to you and to start the review process.

When are you going to actually provide
Legitimate Disproof of Evolution
?


Your link is dead. But you should be able to provide the pertinent arguments, in your own words.

 

[tas8831]

God backwards is Dog. I think there is something to that.

Not if you're German. Or Italian.

Hund = dnuh
Cane = enac

 

[Subduction Zone]

Not if you're German. Or Italian.

Hund = dnuh
Cane = enac

Which proves that English is the language that God uses. At least if you are a dog it does.

 

[McBell]

Not if you're German. Or Italian.

Hund = dnuh
Cane = enac

Except that none of the words you presented are the word "Dog" or "God".
They are the German and Italian equivalence to the words perhaps, but they are not the words "God" or "Dog"...

 

[tas8831]

Why then there are no such ones on this diagram? Look:

Oh me, oh my! No pictures for the science wiz to see, thus, no need to accept that they exist.

Just like how my bible has no pictures of Moses or Job, so I don't accept their existence.