Okay, fair enough. (I did say it was the condensed version.)
If you just read the account with an open mind, and reason on it, you’ll notice the first one: that God is a liar.
Already spotted that one -- Everything that the serpent
said would happen happened... exactly as it said it would.
Whereas God's threat of "on the day you eat of it you shall die" requires considerable poetic license to even be considered truthful... and even then, it falls on deaf ears when given to those who lack the wisdom to avoid death.
Then, this serpent (which we learn in Revelation 12:9 was actually Satan) claimed that they’d (A&E) be better off making their own choices. In this case, rebelling.
It was an issue of sovereignty, and by listening to the serpent and rebelling, A&E gave this issue validity.
First, we can't accept the "serpent=Satan" claim at face value.
Having an open mind is one thing; ignoring the facts is quite another.
The Book of Genesis was written by the Jews, for the Jews.
For the Jews, "Satan" was an angel who reported human delinquencies to God --
not "The Devil" per se, because...
Judaism doesn't believe in Satan as "the Devil." Jewish theology sees "evil" as an abstraction, with no need for an omnimalevolent personification.
After all, the only times Satan is presented in the Old Testament is in the books of Job and Zechariah -- and both times, he is presented as a loyal employee of the Most High...
Second, that is
far from the only (let alone biggest) issue with Genesis.
IF we
do run with the idea that Satan was the serpent (which would require tossing out the theology of the original authors), then that means that Satan's rebellion, war with Heaven, defeat, and subsequent exile into Hell have already happened before the creation event.
Not only this, but Satan has
already found a way to break out of his Infernal prison, and wriggle his way into God's "perfect" creation, that's all the
more reason for God not to leave His perfect children unattended. Creation is still a battleground, and God doesn't even put a lock on the front door of His latest creation?
I’m posting an article better than I can write it. Plus, it’s difficult to type… I have a slight disability.
Please, try to keep an open mind:
https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1102005141
if you have any questions, I’ll try to answer them.
Goodnight.
An interesting read, but it still doesn't really address the question of
why God has chosen to abandon His post and leave Satan in charge (albeit temporarily). Personally, I prefer Thomas Aquinas' theory:
Thomas Aquinas put forth that God, being all-knowing, allows tragedy to occur because He knows that a greater good will come from it further down the line. Amputate the arm, save the patient; that sort of thing. God always plays the long game.
Case in Point:
On May 3, 1980, God allowed 13-year-old Cari Lightner to be hit and killed by a drunk driver. While an apparently senseless loss at the time, it did galvanize Cari's mother, Candice Lightner, to found
MADD: Mothers Against Drunk Driving, an organization which has, through activism and lobbying, prevented tens of thousands of drunk driving accidents across the nation. From tragedy comes triumph.
One could even argue that this is why God allowed the Fall in the first place... although it does raise uncomfortable questions regarding why He's taking so long...
... of course, as an unbeliever, myself, I subscribe to a far simpler theory for the existence of evil and suffering -- the condensed version of "excrement transpires."