• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Less than 6% Of Biden's Spending Plan Goes To Roads and Bridges

esmith

Veteran Member
Seem's that the current administration is blowing smoke.
But that's Ok, the sheeple will overlook their hero's little misrepresentation

Biden's $2T spending plan, billed as infrastructure bill, spends less than half on infrastructure

The analysis, based on the 25-page summary of the president's proposal for the "American Jobs Plan," indicates less than $750 billion of the spending fits even a broad definition of infrastructure.
The White House is casting a very wide net about what constitutes infrastructure — for example, the American Jobs Plan references "care infrastructure" when talking about $25 billion to upgrade child care facilities and a $400 billion expenditure on care for the elderly and disabled. That's quite different from repairing potholes and rebuilding bridges.
Indeed, the White House summary of the American Jobs Plan says it will spend "$115 billion to modernize the bridges, highways, roads, and main streets that are in most critical need of repair" out of more than $2 trillion in the plan. That is slightly under 6%.


What Is in Biden’s $2 Trillion Infrastructure Plan?

$621 billion for transportation infrastructure
Of this money, $115 billion would go toward modernizing 20,000 miles of highways, roads, and main streets nationwide and repairing the “most economically significant large bridges” as well as 10,000 smaller bridges. That amount includes funding for decreasing congestion and reducing carbon emissions and air pollution. Additionally, $20 billion would be invested to improve road safety. The plan would invest $85 billion in order to modernize existing transit and expand those systems to meet rider demand, and $80 billion would go toward improving Amtrak’s corridors and addressing its backlog of repairs.

 

Vee

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Seem's that the current administration is blowing smoke.
But that's Ok, the sheeple will overlook their hero's little misrepresentation

Biden's $2T spending plan, billed as infrastructure bill, spends less than half on infrastructure

The analysis, based on the 25-page summary of the president's proposal for the "American Jobs Plan," indicates less than $750 billion of the spending fits even a broad definition of infrastructure.
The White House is casting a very wide net about what constitutes infrastructure — for example, the American Jobs Plan references "care infrastructure" when talking about $25 billion to upgrade child care facilities and a $400 billion expenditure on care for the elderly and disabled. That's quite different from repairing potholes and rebuilding bridges.
Indeed, the White House summary of the American Jobs Plan says it will spend "$115 billion to modernize the bridges, highways, roads, and main streets that are in most critical need of repair" out of more than $2 trillion in the plan. That is slightly under 6%.

What Is in Biden’s $2 Trillion Infrastructure Plan?

$621 billion for transportation infrastructure
Of this money, $115 billion would go toward modernizing 20,000 miles of highways, roads, and main streets nationwide and repairing the “most economically significant large bridges” as well as 10,000 smaller bridges. That amount includes funding for decreasing congestion and reducing carbon emissions and air pollution. Additionally, $20 billion would be invested to improve road safety. The plan would invest $85 billion in order to modernize existing transit and expand those systems to meet rider demand, and $80 billion would go toward improving Amtrak’s corridors and addressing its backlog of repairs.

Just out of curiosity, does it say how much is going to big corporations and Wall Street?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I wasn't voting for "a person" - I was voting for our future... it doesn't look good to me.
It seems that the plague is just an excuse for a massive spending
spree. I doubt that so much new spending will be monitored well.
 

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Seem's that the current administration is blowing smoke.

The only smoke I'm seeing is from the right desperately in search of a scandal.

Biden's $2T spending plan, billed as infrastructure bill, spends less than half on infrastructure

This is the same nonsense we saw with the COVID relief bill - only 9% went to COVID, another distortion of facts simply ignored.

And from Fox News, no less, that beacon of ethical journalism.

Sorry, but I think most of us on the left are simply not interested in the right's objections. They don't share our values, belief set, vision for the country and world, or agenda. Their purpose is to establish the opposite of what the left values.

Their vision includes the neglect of people's needs, an attack on voting rights, bigotry and racism, and tax breaks for those who don't need it on the back of the middle class. Why would the left be interested in any ideas coming from such people?

Of course the right objects to this spending. They see all dollars collected in taxes as belonging to them, not the people. It draw tax dollars away from what they want them spent on, namely, lining the pockets of their corrupt cronies.

Worse, Biden will raise corporate taxes to pay for it, which makes it even worse in their eyes, but why should we care about that?
 

PureX

Veteran Member
... As opposed to the republican plan ... oh, wait, ... there is no republican plan. Well, except to oppose and obstruct any and all democratic sponsored legislation until midterms, and then blame the fact that nothing is working on the democrats.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
The need for infrastructure repair goes well beyond just roads and bridges, especially since we have an overall D rating overall with our physical structures. If passed, this bill will stimulate investment and growth, thus reducing unemployment while fixing things that simply won't fix themselves.

The Pubs are really good at whining but could care less about spending money to fix what needs to be fixed. For proof of this, what is their proposal? Anyone seen it? They had their president in for four years, so what did you see them accomplish along these lines-- or even propose?

Sorry, but the Pub Party has again returned to being the "Party of No", while the country continues to deteriorate. Why? They have their money, so don't dare ask them to do one damn thing to help other Americans. If you think this is just hyperbole on my part, maybe stop and think about what they have done in recent decades-- or rather what they haven't done.
 

epronovost

Well-Known Member
Repairing and building schools, kindergardens, elderly care centers doesn't seem like a bad idea.

@Revoltingest
A rise in taxes, could help control this inflation though at the moment the economy is a bit down low and could use cash injection. You might see a small rise from the more traditionnal level of inflation, but I doubt it will have an important impact.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Repairing and building schools, kindergardens, elderly care centers doesn't seem like a bad idea.
All spending has some benefit.
But that doesn't mean that all spending is worthwhile.
For example, if you buy a new car, you could have a more
reliable & fuel efficient one. But would these improvements
be worth the cost? You could wind up worse off.

Is there any analysis behind tossing a several trillion dollars
in this manner?
@Revoltingest
A rise in taxes, could help control this inflation though at the moment the economy is a bit down low and could use cash injection. You might see a small rise from the more traditionnal level of inflation, but I doubt it will have an important impact.
Rising taxes control inflation?....how so?

Inflation causes problems.....
- Encourages speculation in housing
- Money loses value
- Capital gain taxes paid based upon the dollars loss of value.
- Wages & prices will increase, but without an increase in buying power.
- Everyone moves to a higher tax bracket.
- More money going to taxes means more work just to stay even.
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
Seem's that the current administration is blowing smoke.
But that's Ok, the sheeple will overlook their hero's little misrepresentation

Biden's $2T spending plan, billed as infrastructure bill, spends less than half on infrastructure

The analysis, based on the 25-page summary of the president's proposal for the "American Jobs Plan," indicates less than $750 billion of the spending fits even a broad definition of infrastructure.
The White House is casting a very wide net about what constitutes infrastructure — for example, the American Jobs Plan references "care infrastructure" when talking about $25 billion to upgrade child care facilities and a $400 billion expenditure on care for the elderly and disabled. That's quite different from repairing potholes and rebuilding bridges.
Indeed, the White House summary of the American Jobs Plan says it will spend "$115 billion to modernize the bridges, highways, roads, and main streets that are in most critical need of repair" out of more than $2 trillion in the plan. That is slightly under 6%.

What Is in Biden’s $2 Trillion Infrastructure Plan?

$621 billion for transportation infrastructure
Of this money, $115 billion would go toward modernizing 20,000 miles of highways, roads, and main streets nationwide and repairing the “most economically significant large bridges” as well as 10,000 smaller bridges. That amount includes funding for decreasing congestion and reducing carbon emissions and air pollution. Additionally, $20 billion would be invested to improve road safety. The plan would invest $85 billion in order to modernize existing transit and expand those systems to meet rider demand, and $80 billion would go toward improving Amtrak’s corridors and addressing its backlog of repairs.
Just in case there is any confusion, infrastructure can mean more than roads and bridges, but don't tell Fox that.
 

epronovost

Well-Known Member
Is there any analysis behind tossing a several trillion dollars
in this manner?

That's yours to know that. You are an American citizen after all not me. Have you read the spending bill or analysis of it from reputable sources?


Rising taxes control inflation?....how so?

To make a very long and complex story with a lot of details very short, It reduces the quantity of money in circulation wich helps reduce inflation.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
That's yours to know that. You are an American citizen after all not me. Have you read the spending bill or analysis of it from reputable sources?
Haven't read it.
I wonder if anyone has?
(Obamacare was passed without reading.)
To make a very long and complex story with a lot of details very short, It reduces the quantity of money in circulation wich helps reduce inflation.
Actually, spending by fiat currency does the
exact opposite, ie, it increases the money supply.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
The need for infrastructure repair goes well beyond just roads and bridges,

Since when is "infrastructure" just roads and bridges?

Pipe, ports, airports, internet are all infrastructure to me.

"There’s also $300 billion to revive U.S. manufacturing," - that to me is competitive infrastructure.

So where's the Republican counter-proposal? Crickets time. All I can hear is whining and chanting - NO NO NO NO NO Let the country fall apart - we don't care and proved it in the past 4 years by not doing anything for infrastructure. All the right cares about is passing Jim Crow laws to stay in power.
 
Top