Ben Dhyan
Veteran Member
Do you have anything better to do than harass, how do you not get suspended for your bad behaviour.Mmm, pseudoscience word salad.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Do you have anything better to do than harass, how do you not get suspended for your bad behaviour.Mmm, pseudoscience word salad.
Wrong, your "sense of reality" is one hundred percent a belief. It is not a fact. You do not know it. You only believe it.But my sense of reality is not a belief, seems likely your sense of reality is a belief, and it is certainly irrational.
So here is a question for you,
When the BB had just began, and say was about the size of a golf ball, what was outside of it?
That post was no more harassing than yours was. Since your behavior is far worse than mine you should be asking yourself how you do not get suspended.Do you have anything better to do than harass, how do you not get suspended for your bad behaviour.
No. the redshift is due to expansion. We do have evidence for that. You already told us that there is no evidence for your TLT.But the redshift is not expansion, it is distance.
Compton scattering is not isotropic.So if you are saying that energy loss from a photon to a particle, involving a minute increase in wavelength, during its travel through the intergalactic medium is scattering, then so be it,
Are you drunk?Wrong, your "sense of reality" is one hundred percent a belief. It is not a fact. You do not know it. You only believe it.
And you do not get to ask questions when you duck them Don't you want to know how you screwed up and admitted that your post was all pseudo science?
Seems that way.That post was no more harassing than yours was. Since your behavior is far worse than mine you should be asking yourself how you do not get suspended.
Oh my, the person that refuses to reason is asking if others are drunk. There goes another irony meter.Are you drunk?
To you because you are 'tone deaf' when it comes to bad behavior. You demand answers when you run away from 90% of the questions asked of you. When you make errors you never own up to them. You post pseudoscience and continually refuse to even learn the basics of science.Seems that way.
Where is your evidence that there is no "before" the BB? And no, that there is no north of the north pole is not good enough!No. the redshift is due to expansion. We do have evidence for that. You already told us that there is no evidence for your TLT.
I do not understand the Big Bang theory well enough to show you, much less explain the math behind it. But I can point out some of the evidence for the Big Bang. But what good would that do? You already told us that you do not understand the concept of evidence and you have resisted opportunities to discuss the topic. Do you remember when you claimed that there was no evidence for the Big Bang? That was when you told us that you do not understand the concept of evidence. If you were given the evidence you would merely deny it.Where is your evidence that there is no "before" the BB? And no, that there is no north of the north pole is not good enough!
It is not Compton scattering.Compton scattering is not isotropic.
You do not need math to explain why there is no "before" the big bang.I do not understand the Big Bang theory well enough to show you, much less explain the math behind it. But I can point out some of the evidence for the Big Bang. But what good would that do? You already told us that you do not understand the concept of evidence and you have resisted opportunities to discuss the topic. Do you remember when you claimed that there was no evidence for the Big Bang? That was when you told us that you do not understand the concept of evidence. If you were given the evidence you would merely deny it.
My oh my, you have too much time on your hands, why don't you just ponder why there is no "before" the BB?To you because you are 'tone deaf' when it comes to bad behavior. You demand answers when you run away from 90% of the questions asked of you. When you make errors you never own up to them. You post pseudoscience and continually refuse to even learn the basics of science.
If you ever want to learn people here will help you.
Really? How do you know that? I am betting that this is just another case of you making claims that you cannot support.You do not need math to explain why there is no "before" the big bang.
So when the BB had just began, and was about the size of a golf ball, what was outside of it?Oh my, the person that refuses to reason is asking if others are drunk. There goes another irony meter.
I do not need to. There are times when it is best to trust those that have been working on an idea for the better parts of their lives.My oh my, you have too much time on your hands, why don't you just ponder why there is no "before" the BB?
Because before the BB there was nothing existing.Really? How do you know that? I am betting that this is just another case of you making claims that you cannot support.
Wow! You have an amazingly poor memory.So when the BB had just began, and was about the size of a golf ball, what was outside of it?
You seem to be the only one claiming that.Because before the BB there was nothing existing.