I know what you stated. That's why I spoke about "facts." It's NOT "based on facts," unless you want to say that combining elements and adding force are "facts" that prove evolution.
That's how atoms work. They bind and unbind and that takes energy and force.
And it is how molecules work...whether the molecules be organic or inorganic, it would still take energy and force.
Chemical reactions occurred with biological matters, which is called metabolism.
Metabolism works with the same principle in molecular chemistry and biochemistry, but often it require a boost from proteins, which biologists called proteins, "enzymes".
Metabolism is very for important for sustaining life. And there are number of different types of metabolism, the most common is converting food into the energy source, to sustain life.
What YoursTrue say here:
...unless you want to say that combining elements and adding force are "facts" that prove evolution.
... it doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
What do combining elements have to do with "that prove evolution".
To
@YoursTrue
That sentence I quoted, don't make much sense, it is gibberish. What you said about elements being "combined" and "adding force", don't prove or disprove Evolution. It is just nonsensical claim. All your statements show that you don't understand biology, you don't understand chemistry and you don't understand physics.
Can you clarify that statement, YoursTrue?
Be more specific as to what "elements" and what "force" you are talking about.
Do you think asking for experimental or observational confirmation is Newtonian in some way? 
