There are two ways to get a red shift. These two ways can be explained with a simple example. Say we have a train that is passing by, blowing its horn. We will hear the pitch of the horn change as it approaches us and as it moves away. The pitch will increase as it approaches and decrease as it moves away. This is the classic doppler shift; blue and red shift, respectively. This is used by science to measure the rate of expansion and to estimate age of the universe.
The other way would be the train is stationary, but the engineer is altering the pitch of the horn; frequency shift, by turning a dial on the horn, that allows you to tailor the pitch. To the untrained ear, this will make one think the train is moving toward us or away from us depending on the pitch profile the engineer plays for the crowd. The second option is not part of the current science model, but makes a big difference in terms of what we think we know.
There is actually another way to get a red shift: gravity. A photon rising in a gravitational well will red shift. This is a well-known and measured effect.
The red shift of the BB theory is actually closer to being a gravitational red shift than it is a doppler shift. In particular, a doppler shift of more than 1 would be impossible, but there are many known galaxies with such a red shift.
Next, we do not see the change in red shift as in your second scenario. We can detect the lines for hydrogen emission and measure the red shift that they show. This i definitely NOT what happens in your second scenario.
Time is a dynamic variable, while length is a passive variable. We measure time with a clock, with clocks needing a source of energy to work. We measure length with a meter stick which is a passive tool that does not need a battery or spring. Frequency shift is connected to a change in the dynamic variable of energy; frequency, leading a change in the passive variable; wavelength, instead of the current passive variable leading the dynamic variable; doppler shift.
Time moves to the future. As time goes on, things age. Unlike energy, that is a wave that repeats, time does not repeat, nor can we go back into time. Entropy has this in common with time, in that both spontaneously move in one direction; both time and entropy will increase. This commonality allow the 2nd law to induce a frequency red shift.
Hmmm...and entropy induced red shift? Do you have any evidence of such an effect?
Suppose I change the entropy of a gas. Will that change the frequency of the spectrum emitted by that gas? That would be a very simple experiment to do. Do you have any evidence this effect occurs?
The confusion in science is connected to the clocks we use to measure time. These use some form of energy and are set up to cycle like energy; 12 noon and 12 midnight appears each day like a sine wave. This tool misrepresents the nature of time. It equates time with energy; kinetic energy, instead of entropy.
Actually, it does neither. For example, the frequency of light is neither kinetic energy nor is it entropy. But that is what is usually used to measure time.
Really? Care to give evidence of this? It would have been very obvious in many experiments done over the last 150 years, but as far as I know, no such effect has been found. Do you have a reference?When entropy increases, energy is absorbed and time is used up;
No, this will NOT give a red shift in the spectrum. So, for example, if you look at a particular emission line, that line will not get red shifted. It *would* narrow slightly because of the cooling and the overall, *thermal* emission would shift to lower frequencies. But this is NOT the type of red shift actually observed.As a visual, say we had a compressed cylinder of gas at temperature T. We opened the valve and the cylinder will gets colder; red shift in the observational IR energy as entropy increases.
No, it would not. The spectrum actually observed would show *cooling*, not a doppler shift.It will appear to be moving away from us if we assume there is only kinetic energy and doppler shift.
If you compress that same gas and thereby heat it up, the thermal emission will become bluer.We will never see a blue shift connected to 2nd law, since the genie will not go back into the bottle and release the lost energy, since both entropy and time need go forward and increase, which will use up energy.