• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

LGBTQ

Eliana

Member
Are you claiming all Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual people are attracted to professional models? I’m calling bull pucky on this one; my friend; you aren’t qualified to speak on behalf of all gay people.

Is English your second language? Do you even have a first? LGBT at attracted to the modelling industry, not to models. Perhaps learn reading comprehension.

I never said they effeminate.

Oh, so they were manly men who you just happened to confuse for women? Now we know why trans people upset you so much... you can't even tell the difference between cis men and women. Your poor brain.

Just because you say it, doesn’t make it true. Face it; you’re just expressing your subjective opinions, nothing you are saying is based on facts, or any type of empirical evidence.

To say it only happened a couple of times moving the goal posts?

Saying facial feminization is a thing and cis men can't pass for women unless it's on purpose is a subjective opinion? Remember when I suggested some of you learn what words mean? Haven't you and the other bottom dwellers of these types of threads been arguing gender is obvious by chromosomes and physical appearance, i.e. genitalia? You can't even stick to a consistent argument because you don't have one, just a contempt for trans people. You don't fool anyone.

Women haven't asked you to take up the cause of their spaces either; what's your point?

It’s not all about you. Just because you might be fine with everything, doesn't mean everybody else is.

At least I am a woman, and you are not, Other women and myself can speak for ourselves. It is telling that the majority of people oh so concerned about women's spaces are transphobic men. You claim to be deeply concerned about our safety because you think it obfuscates the bigotry behind your rhetoric. We aren't stupid and can see right through you.
 

Kfox

Well-Known Member
Is English your second language? Do you even have a first? LGBT at attracted to the modelling industry, not to models.
Just saying that is not good enough; provide evidence LGBT are attracted to the modeling industry, because I’ve never heard of this one.
Oh, so they were manly men who you just happened to confuse for women?
No, it was an area of town where a lot of people are punked out, goth, or some type of non-traditional style of clothing. For such people it is often difficult to distinguish male from female; especially if they’re clothes are baggy and they’re over weight. Now if these people were LGBT, I can assure you; they were not attracted to the modeling industry. Now that I’ve given a description; why does this matter?
Saying facial feminization is a thing and cis men can't pass for women unless it's on purpose is a subjective opinion?
Unless you have objective evidence that nobody is gonna be able to distinguish a man who has had such surgery from a woman, this is your subjective opinion.
Remember when I suggested some of you learn what words mean? Haven't you and the other bottom dwellers of these types of threads been arguing gender is obvious by chromosomes and physical appearance, i.e. genitalia?
I’ve never said anything like that. Perhaps your problem is you are ascribing to me what someone else said to you. If you gonna put words in my mouth, make sure they’re MY words; not somebody else's.
At least I am a woman, and you are not, Other women and myself can speak for ourselves.
No; you only speak for yourself just like me, other women speak for themselves.
 

Eliana

Member
Just saying that is not good enough; provide evidence LGBT are attracted to the modeling industry, because I’ve never heard of this one.

Noooooo, this is what you said:

Are you claiming all Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual people are attracted to professional models?

You made an idiotic comment and now you must forever live with it. If you really never heard that LGBT are attracted to the modelling industry I'd like to know what rock you've been living under.

No, it was an area of town where a lot of people are punked out, goth, or some type of non-traditional style of clothing. For such people it is often difficult to distinguish male from female; especially if they’re clothes are baggy and they’re over weight. Now if these people were LGBT, I can assure you; they were not attracted to the modeling industry. Now that I’ve given a description; why does this matter?

I just enjoy watching you continuously tweak this narrative over and over again when I point out the plot holes and lack of logic. Now they were all goths? Uh huh. You're so full of it. What next? You had soap in your eyes and you couldn't see clearly?

Unless you have objective evidence that nobody is gonna be able to distinguish a man who has had such surgery from a woman, this is your subjective opinion.

That's kind of the whole point of FFS, you donkey, to be indistinguishable. Otherwise no one would bother to have it done.

I’ve never said anything like that. Perhaps your problem is you are ascribing to me what someone else said to you. If you gonna put words in my mouth, make sure they’re MY words; not somebody else's.

This you bro?

Rather than a gender test, how about if we separate everybody on the basis of biology rather than gender? If you were born with only X sex Chromosomes, (assuming you do not have Swyers Syndrome) you play women's sports, and if you have the y you play with the men. Sounds like an easy fix to me.
If he still has a penis, he should use the men's shower facility.
If this person does not have Swyers Syndrome, and does not have a Y Sex Chromosome, this person is female/woman.
No; it's defining the word man with the word MALE. Now if you wanna know what a male is, we can get into chrosomes and other stuff.
This rant has nothing to do with the question at hand. Again; the question is, how does a naked biological female with sex organs in tact drying off in the female locker room not pass the glance test?
Upon entry, you gotta take their word for it. But if they are caught naked in front of a locker with the wrong sex organs, they can have their membership suspended.
Yes! If somebody complains of someone with the wrong sex organs in the locker room, there are consequences. Just the fact that there are consequences will likely prevent people from committing the offense.

This is how we know you and people like you are full of it and totally dishonest actors. You can't even keep track of what you post because you're just trying to "win" and vent your bigotry. You guys will even contradict yourselves if you think it will help your nonsense cause.

Women haven't asked you to take up the cause of their spaces either; what's your point?

It’s not all about you. Just because you might be fine with everything, doesn't mean everybody else is.

Well I have never really heard any women complaining. Sure I've seen some FOX news and similar pundits on TV here or there, but otherwise always homophobic men like you.

No; you only speak for yourself just like me, other women speak for themselves.

You don't speak for you because you're not a woman using these facilities. You don't have a say, women do. Maybe take your own advice, shut up and let them speak for themselves.
 

Argentbear

Well-Known Member
According to the article below, the following countries and agencies have strongly limited or reduced their GAC protocols, largely due to the Cass report:

Wales
Scotland
Germany
Belgium
Ireland
Netherlands
The UN's UNSRVAW
European Society of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Further, WPATH, AAP, and ES, have been found to be using circular referencing of each other's guidelines to falsely bolster their credibility.

One Month Recap Since the Final Cass Report - Person and Identity Project
Yeah. I'm going to accept information from a group that says LGBT kids are diseased and need to be kept away from other children so that disease won't spread
 

Kfox

Well-Known Member
You made an idiotic comment and now you must forever live with it. If you really never heard that LGBT are attracted to the modelling industry I'd like to know what rock you've been living under.
Though I originally misquote you, your actual words are just as foolish as the misquote; if you want to be taken seriously, provide an outside source to support your claim because your word is not good enough.
I just enjoy watching you continuously tweak this narrative over and over again when I point out the plot holes and lack of logic. Now they were all goths? Uh huh. You're so full of it. What next? You had soap in your eyes and you couldn't see clearly?
The only reason I tweaked what I said was you have a habit of making stuff up about me that was not true. The only thing I said was that I mistaken people in the mens room for female, but they said they were male. From that you made the leap that these people were manly men, an effeminate men, feminine women and lord knows what else. So I explained what the people looked like and why I mistaken them. Tell you what, why don’t you respond to what I actually say instead of making stuff about me? That way I won’t have to tweak everything for you.
That's kind of the whole point of FFS, you donkey, to be indistinguishable. Otherwise no one would bother to have it done.
All the FFS in the world is no guarantee you will fool everybody. And the fact that you are constantly spewing
Your personal attacks and emotional outbursts show you are getting upset that your arguments are falling apart like a house of cards. I find it rather comical.
This you bro?
Yes I said all of those things. CONTEXT! It’s all about context my friend. It’s not like I was suggesting we should check genitals or chromosomes when someone enters the locker room! C’mon!
Well I have never really heard any women complaining. Sure I've seen some FOX news and similar pundits on TV here or there, but otherwise always homophobic men like you.
Perhaps you’ve only surrounded yourself with people who only think like you. Just because you don’t see it doesn’t mean it does not exist.
You don't speak for you because you're not a woman using these facilities. You don't have a say, women do. Maybe take your own advice, shut up and let them speak for themselves.
You think because I’m a man, I have no right to speak on issues concerning women? Are you kidding me??? What’s next! Because I’m black I have no right to speak on issues concerning white people? Or because I’m American, I have no right to speak on issues going on in Israel? Sorry! but in the real world it doesn’t work that way my friend; I will comment on any issue I choose to. If you have a problem with that, then that is something you are gonna have to deal with.
 

Kfox

Well-Known Member
No, I'm shocked that you know so little about culture or the fashion industry in particular that you don't realize that that industry is mostly gay men and many of the models are trans women.
I've never said or even implied such a thing. So are you under the impression the vast majority of gay and lesbian are attracted to the fashion industry? Isn't this a bit like saying al Asians know Karate, or all Jewish people are bankers, Or all black people are good dancers?
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
Yeah. I'm going to accept information from a group that says LGBT kids are diseased and need to be kept away from other children so that disease won't spread

It's clear that the "medical establishment" is heavily invested in WPATH's SOC, i.e. GAC. It's clear that the "medical establishment" won't go down without a fight. Of course that will end up biting them all in the ***.

What many suspect will ultimately be the undoing of GAC is lawsuits, and more and more lawsuits are being filed. In the meantime, and IMO, purveyors of GAC will continue to destroy the lives of thousands of confused kids :(
 

Argentbear

Well-Known Member
It's clear that the "medical establishment" is heavily invested in WPATH's SOC, i.e. GAC. It's clear that the "medical establishment" won't go down without a fight. Of course that will end up biting them all in the ***.

What many suspect will ultimately be the undoing of GAC is lawsuits, and more and more lawsuits are being filed. In the meantime, and IMO, purveyors of GAC will continue to destroy the lives of thousands of confused kids :(
lets see, gender affirming care reduces suicidality by 73% and has long term effects on mental health outcomes
Mental Health Outcomes in Transgender and Nonbinary Youths Receiving Gender-Affirming Care Diana M. Tordoff 2022
Gender-affirming care improves mental health outcomes, including reducing depression and anxiety.
Denying gender affirming care is what destroys lives
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
lets see, gender affirming care reduces suicidality by 73% and has long term effects on mental health outcomes
Mental Health Outcomes in Transgender and Nonbinary Youths Receiving Gender-Affirming Care Diana M. Tordoff 2022
Gender-affirming care improves mental health outcomes, including reducing depression and anxiety.
Denying gender affirming care is what destroys lives
Cass did a 4-year-long meta-study and found that all the the claims you just made are based on low quality evidence. And to be clear, when medical research is done in general, low quality evidence is never sufficient.

And BTW, Cass is still advising talk therapy, so any implication otherwise is wrong.
 

Argentbear

Well-Known Member
Cass did a 4-year-long meta-study and found that all the the claims you just made are based on low quality evidence. And to be clear, when medical research is done in general, low quality evidence is never sufficient.
and she created a low quality study by ignoring 60% of available studies
And BTW, Cass is still advising talk therapy, so any implication otherwise is wrong.
she advocated so called reparative therapy, something with a huge track record of causing harm. Which seems to be her goal
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
and she created a low quality study by ignoring 60% of available studies

she advocated so called reparative therapy, something with a huge track record of causing harm. Which seems to be her goal
Tell all of this to the growing list of unhappy detransitioners. And again, the wave of lawsuits is coming.
 
Top