I've tried following your argument, and to be quite frank and possibly insulting, all I see reminds me quite strongly of an anti-gay Christian desperatly twisting things so that his support for discriminatory laws doesn;t apepar to be based purely on religion.
Trouble is, everyone knows it's only based on religion.
To date I have seen you only quoting scriptures, and not science.
See post #672 for the basis outside "religion."
The Bible is not the basis for the
laws of nature. It is the basis for the
authority of the laws of nature, which laws do not allow mankind to plead ignorance in cases relating to them
and, therefore, mankind will be held accountable based on those laws.
That is a religious response, not scientific, and not involving " merely seeds".
Demonstrate the faulty science.
The Bible gives divine authority to the laws of nature as they relate to an issue, as in the issue of God's existence and his
invisible qualities (Rom 1:19-21).
Those laws being authoritative, mankind cannot plead ignorance, and will be held accountable according to those laws, as they relate to an issue.
The laws of nature regarding seeds relate to the issue of human seed. Those laws are authoritative for the nature of seeds and, therefore,
mankind cannot plead ignorance on the issue of human seed, and will be held accountable based on their laws,
just as the pagans could not plead ignorance on the existence of God and his
invisible qualities revealed in nature alone, and were held accountable based on the observation of nature alone (Rom 1:19-21).
This is the Biblical
principle of Rom 1:19-31, and it authorizes the laws of nature (regarding seeds) to apply to the issue of human seed, as the laws of nature applied to the issue of God's existence and
invisible qualities in Rom 1:19-21.
The Bible is not the basis for the laws in nature regarding seeds. Science is.
The Bible is the basis for the
authority of the laws in nature as they relate to an issue, in this case human seed; and, because those laws have divine authority, mankind cannot plead ignorance in cases relating to them, and will be held accountable in those cases.