It's more a question of what is life itself. What is it that makes one thing dead or inanimate and another alive?
We identify life whenever we see its signature characteristics: collections of matter that are animate (at the subcellular level at least), channel energy (eat, absorb sunlight, maintain a far from equilibrium state = homeostasis), growth and development, reproduction and repair, adapt and evolve, made of cells, organic, chemically complex, etc..
It's not difficult to identify what objects possess these qualities and perform these operations, and we call those living.
So life exists as a definition of an object with a set of properties we decided such an object ought to have.
We choose definitions so that they include all items that we wish to consider collectively and exclude others. I don't know that we decide what properties a living thing ought to have, but rather, what properties we find clustered together in predictable and distinct ways.
life itself does not exist as a property since it is define as a set of other properties.
That's the case with abstractions in general. They have no existence outside of being an idea in a mind, but they derive from experiencing things outside of the mind that we would say do exist.
We create an concept and give it a name. Does that mean it has an existence separate from it's mental concept?
In the case of life, an abstraction, it exists only as an idea, but it refers to that collection of properties and activities that do exist. What we call living things exist, and we collect them under the abstraction life, because we find utility in considering that collection of things collectively and distinct from other things that don't get the name living. Maybe we want to consider the first thing that had these qualities, as when discussing the origin of life, or all of the extant ones as the tree of life.
I think the lines themselves are what the OP was questioning. We obviously get to draw them as we wish for our own purposes... but do the lines themselves really exist?
If that's what the question asks, then no, the lines are abstractions, and we choose where to place them according to our needs. Definitions are ours to choose. We can divvy off groups for purposes of discussion according to our purpose.