Bishadi
Active Member
So, concluding your argument for you, you have faith that we will someday be able to see life be created out of something not living. Right?
without a microscope; I could mix 2 fluids and a life would exists.
Sperm/egg….
How is life coming from non life demostrable, repeatable or observable??
that is the issue; defining what that ‘life’ is…
and since we are from the basic building blocks of life and have evolved over billions of years, then that spark of life since the beginning of time is still alive in all that life you can see and experience.I believe the 2nd law of Thermodynamics would show that as energy is used it becomes less and less. Energy itself would not has lasted over "billions" of spillings of the scrabble game itself. No?
So the second law, has not reduced to equilibrium this life, for billions of years.
same as every book, including the burning bush kind of ‘writing’….I would conclude that all graffiti is painted by humans.
and you talking about the genetics of life and the billions of building blocks the sciences have taught you…. by using logic and knowledge, and I will bet it came from sources other than theologyIt seems to me that non-creationists are the ones that do not use logic in their explanations of things.
get the hint?
I guess if I put my faith in upcoming knowledge I will be better off then
probably best
Last edited: