Thief
Rogue Theologian
And that would be your Achille's heal.
You're living a linear existence, while at the same time denying it.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Logical explanation for no God
- Thread starter AWsmith82
- Start date
And that would be your Achille's heal.
You're living a linear existence, while at the same time denying it.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Faith needs no proving...however....
The question I posed in my previous post is a crossroads.
You have chosen.
You chose poorly.
Spirit first.
PolyHedral
Superabacus Mystic
We perceive linearity. Our perceptions have been flawed in the past.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Show us your epiphany.
Gjallarhorn
N'yog-Sothep
Correction: faith can't be proven. It's irrational and based on rejecting evidence for the sake of belief.
I've chosen what separates humans from (most) other animals. If you choose to follow a lesser path, congratulations.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Correction back at you.
Faith requires no proving is a correct statement (Webster's).
As for my beliefs, I don't use dogma.
I use cause and effect...spirit first.
I would like to see you expound on your last claim to fame.
Start a thread to that effect and send me a pm.
Gjallarhorn
N'yog-Sothep
Unless you can prove what you believe under the title of "faith", I really have nothing to discuss.
Photonic
Ad astra!
Cause and effect, you can't get something from nothing, so why do you claim God created everything? What created God?
What created that which created God?
What created that which created that which created God?
What created that which created that which created that which created God?
What created that which created that which created that which created that which created God?
What created that which created that which created that which created that which created that which created God?
How long do you want to continue this charade?
As to belief in something unfounded. Flying Spaghetti Monster.
Disprove it.
Gjallarhorn
N'yog-Sothep
Obviously, since we defined God as the first thing, it is objectively so that God is the first thing. Have some faith.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
And you accept the definition that faith requires no proving....yet insist upon proof?
I like your last post,btw.
PolyHedral
Superabacus Mystic
The speed of light is constant, no matter where you are, how you are moving, or where you are looking. This shows us that time is non-linear. It must change rate at different points in space.
Photonic
Ad astra!
Accepting the definition of a word, while disagreeing with the word itself, does not mean he is being hypocritical.
Photonic
Ad astra!
You know, I just had a thought, what if the neutrino experiment was coherent with this line of thinking?
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Must be a typo.
Light as a constant....yet must change rate?
And this would be relevant to God in what manner?
Last edited:
Thief
Rogue Theologian
And word games are circular until someone makes a choice.
Photonic
Ad astra!
Kettle in the space from future-past.
sandy whitelinger
Veteran Member
Fuzzy math?Math. It's a big ball of wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey stuff, in reality.
How can the subject that knows all the substances be known by the substance as an object?
https://notes.utk.edu/bio/greenberg.nsf/0/f2d03252295e0d0585256e120009adab?OpenDocument
PolyHedral
Superabacus Mystic
Go back, and reread the post. I think you've misintepreted it delibrately.
I meant space is wibbly-wobbly. Math is fine. (Except, of course, fuzzy logic, but that's supposed to be wibbly.)
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Not at all...and I took a look at your wiki offering.
None the less....Einstein wrote his famous equation using light as a constant.
He then set that equation aside for several years, looking for a better expression.
He died knowing the work was not done.
And it may never be.
As for God...
You already know, from previous threads...
There will be no proving by equation, or experiment.
No photo, or fingerprint.
When it comes to believing in God....
you just have to think about it, and make up your mind.
As for logic....back to cause and effect....spirit first.
Last edited: