Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'm nearing the end of the first part, with the conclusion that it is probable that God exists, and that faith can be rationale. Definitely not what I thought the conclusion was, but it's where the research is leading.
Nice to meet you. I look forward to some conversations and learning more of your thoughts.A bit about me. I grew up in a fundamentalist house, where I was groomed to be a minister. At 18, I was ordained, but the church I was at really had fallen a part and new leadership was brought in, so I was out.
I rebelled, and converted to Judaism. I also toyed around a bit with Islam, and converted for a short while to it, before becoming a militant atheist. I can assure you I was incredibly annoying.
But then I met my wife, and started going back to church. I became more agnostic, and eventually agnostic theist. I ended up going to college for Religious Studies and History, while minoring in Greek and Classics. I did that in a roundabout way as when I was getting my associates, I couldn't really make my mind up. I studied psychology, criminal justice, secondary education, and literature. I spent way too much time getting my associates. But that led me to a Bachelors program, that I also spent way too much time on.
Now I'm beginning to pursue a Master's in Theology. I had a chance to go about it in a unique manner, but currently I'm working on a large argument in regards to the existence of God. The assignment was to create an argument about God, whether God exists or not, and if God does exist, about God's morality and it's connection with us. It's a lot to take on, but the point was to push me.
I'm nearing the end of the first part, with the conclusion that it is probable that God exists, and that faith can be rationale. Definitely not what I thought the conclusion was, but it's where the research is leading.
Other than that, I'm married, and have 3 kids. My middle child, when he was 2, was diagnosed with cancer, but is now cancer free. We still have regular CT scans, but they have been clear so far. My oldest son loves reading and sports. Then my youngest son is now just 2 and is a terror. But he makes our family very happy as well.
The background to my question was my thought that to say that God exists and to bring in morality brings up the question of God's nature. Is God immanent or transcendent or both transcending the duality of immanence and transcendence?
Christians typically have one frame-of-reference to address this although, of course, some might focus on "I am that I am" and reflect that God's nature is beyond the rational mind.
Morality also necessarily involves a view. If one sees the duality of God being separate from humans, then morality has one path. If the view is that we are all God but are, as it were, dreaming, then that casts a different light on the question.
And a belief in reincarnation and karma (sowing and reaping) changes how might view pain and pleasure in any given life and thus reflect on morality as a topic.
Welcome
Just wondering, since you seem to have been a bit all over the place, did you ever consider yourself a true believer in any of them or did you always have doubt? Or what made you change from lets say Judaism to Islam? And especially what made you change from militant atheist back to a theist? Because it seems like you are going from one extreme to another or maybe just a good amount of the way, so to speak?
The reason I ask is because im an atheist my self, but do not consider my self a militant one or being part of the new atheism tendency, which are actively trying to stop religion. Im probably somewhere between, so it just seems like you went on a huge rollercoaster ride, can you expand on that?
@amatuerscholar LOL...spellcheck is your friend.
Welcome to the madhouse.
Just wondering if you view "theology" as something that Jesus taught? Do we need a degree in theology to understand and practice his teachings?
I learned more from the Bible itself than I ever learned from a man with a degree in theology....just sayin'.....
Very interesting stuff. I read some of your blog on your website as well. I think you and I have may have some common thoughts about these thing. I've recently been reading works by John Dominic Crossan that have helped put things into a more reasoned discussion about the historical Jesus. I agree, while it's hard to read the gospel accounts as literal history (which is not their purpose), it's another thing to glibly claim it's just made up out of whole cloth. There is just too much detail there that can been seen, to imagine this is nothing but pure fantasy. Too many things line up, when examined from a cross-disciplinary perspective.I'm more of a panentheist, which I think helps sum up a lot of problems. With that, I see God as being self-limiting, in that God is all powerful, but in order for humans to have any power, to be humans, God has to take a step back. This is an idea I'm working more through though as it works in some cases, but when placed in the context of the Holocaust, there arises other problems.
Growing up, I was a very devout believer in fundamentalism Christianity. What changed that was the movie Stigmata, which introduced me to the Gospel of Thomas. When I started questioning that, I was told that I needed to stop or I was going to hell. That didn't sit right with me, and I started looking elsewhere as I still had faith in God. I converted to Judaism as it's part of my heritage, so it was a way to connect with that, but also because I met a Rabbi who really helped me work through my questions and thoughts about God. But looking back now, it was simply too late. I was already really loosing faith and part of that was just rebelling against my parents.
As for what brought me from being a militant atheist to a theist really was researching the historical Jesus. As a militant atheist, I was convinced of the Christ-myth theory. But as I continued researching it, I started reading the views of historians, and of various scholars, and I couldn't justify my acceptance of the Jesus-myth idea, which made me question other ideas that I had. Mainly though, it helped strip away some of my anger, and pushed me to be more open.
I view theology as the complete study of God or gods. So while it does look at what Jesus taught, it goes beyond that. Part of it is how to read the Bible and place it in a historical context. How others interpreted various verses. It tackles ethical and moral issues. So I see it as much more.
I view theology as the complete study of God or gods. So while it does look at what Jesus taught, it goes beyond that.
Part of it is how to read the Bible and place it in a historical context. How others interpreted various verses. It tackles ethical and moral issues. So I see it as much more.