Skwim
Veteran Member
Considering how extremely bad porno plots are, I'd have to agree,Sounds like a good plot for a porno.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Considering how extremely bad porno plots are, I'd have to agree,Sounds like a good plot for a porno.
I suppose that is all the same to me.I read her post as saying that while god is consistent, morality is not.
So, if righteousness has nothing to do with being "morally good" and "acting in accord with divine or moral law : free from guilt or sin," just what does righteousness mean in the Bible?
But other Christians do and have judged him to be righteous.
I've never been absolutely sure what "fearing god" means,but if all it takes to be righteous is to fear god, then I assume one could be a serial child sex abuser who poisons little old ladies and still be considered righteous. That about it?
I suppose that is all the same to me.
I swear, using scripture as a reference for morality... that is just weird.
Of course not.
Morality is not a divine concept.
An apology for misinterpreting my post and getting all stuffy about it wouldn't go amiss. But it's up to you
Our sins do not negate what's in our heart, it reflects what's in our hearts.None of us are perfect, but do our sins negate whats in our hearts?
Our sins do not negate what's in our heart, it reflects what's in our hearts.
Our sins do not negate what's in our heart, it reflects what's in our hearts.
Just not sure what "fear of god" means.I just told you. Righteousness is attributed to those that fear God.
Okay, then can I take it that fearing god means repenting one's sins? If so, then the trouble with the Lot story is that from what I can tell he never repented. Have a I missed this somewhere?And I've done terrible things, you've done terrible things, maybe not something as morally reprehensible as serial child abuse but none of us are innocent. So yes, sure, if they were truly repentant than they could be considered righteous.
Right.
So it would be fine for me to judge you as a person based solely on the bad things you've done?
Just not sure what "fear of god" means.
Okay, then can I take it that fearing god means repenting one's sins? If so, then the trouble with the Lot story is that from what I can tell he never repented. Have a I missed this somewhere?
Of course, "bad" is a subjective term. According to literalist Evangelic Christians, I am a blasphemous abomination who was defied the will of God, and simply unforgivable for my denouncing of the Holy Ghost. According to some people I have my "quirks" and "indulgences" that no good person would do, but I'm other wise a good person. To some people I don't do these "bad things."So it would be fine for me to judge you as a person based solely on the bad things you've done?
Thanks.No, fearing God is in all ways revering Him.
Fine, then it still stands that if one is a serial child sex abuser who poisons little old ladies, as long as you revere god you're a righteous guy. BOY, this sure puts a spin on the meaning of "righteous." We then have two very different meanings of "righteousness"And I don't think it's fair to judge Lot based on a story about Him. A persons life is more than that, And Lots entire life and every thought was not accounted for so I cannot say. All I know is that he was deemed righteous because of his fear of God. His sins do not negate that.
Thanks.
Fine, then it still stands that if one is a serial child sex abuser who poisons little old ladies, as long as you revere god you're a righteous guy. BOY, this sure puts a spin on the meaning of "righteous." We then have two very different meanings of "righteousness"
1) Common meaning:
a. morally good2) Christian meaning
b.acting in accord with moral law
c.morally right or justifiable
a. Fearing (revering) god
How could David have truly repented to the man he sent on a suicide mission? He couldn't have, and that is the one he needed forgiveness from. Doing what David did, there is no justification in calling him "righteous" just because he was a "god fearing" man. Lot offered his daughters to be gang raped. Someone who would resort to such a thing has no right or business being called "righteous." God fearing or not, offering your daughters as expendable pieces of meat is something only a real ******* could do.Only someone who has truly repented of that is capable of righteousness.
How could David have truly repented to the man he sent on a suicide mission? He couldn't have, and that is the one he needed forgiveness from. Doing what David did, there is no justification in calling him "righteous" just because he was a "god fearing" man. Lot offered his daughters to be gang raped. Someone who would resort to such a thing has no right or business being called "righteous." God fearing or not, offering your daughters as expendable pieces of meat is something only a real ******* could do.
First that came to mind I guess.In what way is abusing children and poisoning little old ladies (Is that the best imagery you could conjure btw?)
I wouldn't say it is. My point is; from what you've said, as far as being a righteous person it doesn't make any difference what one does (hence my two examples) as long as one fears god. Because fearing god will make you righteous.. . . revering God?
Okay, let's get this straightened out.Only someone who has truly repented of that is capable of righteousness.
First that came to mind I guess.
I wouldn't say it is. My point is; from what you've said, as far as being a righteous person it doesn't make any difference what one does (hence my two examples) as long as one fears god. Because fearing god will make you righteous.
Okay, let's get this straightened out.
In post 43 you said one can be considered righteous if one repents.
then and in post 51 you said
a) to be righteous one must must fear god,and
b) fearing god is revering him.
Therefore, it follows that to be righteous one must revere god
So we have two ways one can be righteous
1) repent (post 43)Which is it?
2) revere god (post 51)
Okey dokey, but the Bible never says Lot repented of anything, much less of what he did to his daughters, yet Christians say he was righteous. The Bible never says Lot revered god, yet Christians say he was righteous. Of course one can always suppose he repented, or suppose he revered god, but this could be said about anyone. So the big question is, why make an issue of his righteousness?For goodness sake, it's not either or.
Repentence is what God calls us to do, it is an act of revering God.
It's not an impossible standard to expect someone to not abuse their power in a way that he sends someone to die so he can have his wife, or expecting someone to care enough about their daughters (or sons) to not offer them up for a gang rape. No one is perfect, but those deeds are utterly despicable. David could have starved himself to death over guilt and stress, but it wouldn't have done the victim any good. Lot made an offering that no reasonable or good parent would even think of. Being "men of god" should not be sufficient to excuse such abhorrent actions and proclaim them "righteous."If that's not good enough for you then fine, I can't argue with impossible standards.