DUI, eh.The problem is, I actually thought about that spelling -- but I was also enjoying a pint, perhaps not my first. I shall, of course, always despise you for outing me in public!
(Discussing Under the Influence)
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
DUI, eh.The problem is, I actually thought about that spelling -- but I was also enjoying a pint, perhaps not my first. I shall, of course, always despise you for outing me in public!
If I understand Christian Nationalists correctly, I wonder why any women voted at all --- for anyone? I listened just today to a fellow saying that women shouldn't vote because it's not an individual thing, its a family thing -- and women, if they don't have husbands, at least have fathers, brothers, uncles (notice the one thing all have in common -- a penis -- that holy grail of fundies everywhere) to tell them what they should be thinking and voting for.Presumably this explains why no women voted for T****. Oh, wait...
If I understand Christian Nationalists correctly, I wonder why any women voted at all --- for anyone? I listened just today to a fellow saying that women shouldn't vote because it's not an individual thing, its a family thing -- and women, if they don't have husbands, at least have fathers, brothers, uncles (notice the one thing all have in common -- a penis -- that holy grail of fundies everywhere) to tell them what they should be thinking and voting for.
AP's into spinning the Leftist fearmongering propaganda yarn, eh?
No...women who feel confident before the alpha male. That's it.Stockholm syndrome.
Let's drop the childish nonsense, shall we?No...women who feel confident before the alpha male. That's it.
You're drunk?I am very serious in this answer.
I am not joking.
So I will not condone any post dismissing my very serious and detailed comment.
I believe there is a very serious issue of psychiatric and sexual nature. I had a sexologist as therapist who was incredibly skilled, so ...I learned many things during these sessions.
There is a toxic feminism that means to literally subdue the white American man, and means to empower those phallic, bossy women who want to "undo male chauvinism" in the privacy of their marital bed.
Even the missionary position is a symptom of patriarchy so these women impose "positions that avoid male supremacy and female submission".
In other words, leaders like Putin, Orban, Trump are confident alpha males who can threaten this operation of transforming males into beta males, so they re considered the enemy number one.
They say Zelensky is bisexual or gay...so he's not a threat. He's okay.
The premise points out I am sober.You're drunk?
Seems like drunken rambling. My bad. If you're actually serious.The premise points out I am sober.
Even if you're serious, it certainly cannot be taken seriously. It's nonsensical drivel.I am very serious in this answer.
I am not joking.
So I will not condone any post dismissing my very serious and detailed comment.
I believe there is a very serious issue of psychiatric and sexual nature. I had a sexologist as therapist who was incredibly skilled, so ...I learned many things during these sessions.
There is a toxic feminism that means to literally subdue the white American man, and means to empower those phallic, bossy women who want to "undo male chauvinism" in the privacy of their marital bed.
Even the missionary position is a symptom of patriarchy so these women impose "positions that avoid male supremacy and female submission".
In other words, leaders like Putin, Orban, Trump are confident alpha males who can threaten this operation of transforming males into beta males, so they re considered the enemy number one.
I would expect you to disprove my points.Seems like drunken rambling. My bad. If you're actually serious.
I expect you to back up your claims with evidence. But I already know that's expecting the impossible.I would expect you to disprove my points.
From your source:Even if you're serious, it certainly cannot be taken seriously. It's nonsensical drivel.
Isabelle Frances-Wright, director of technology and society at the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, a think tank focusing on polarization and extremism, said she had seen a “very large uptick in a number of types of misogynistic rhetoric immediately after the election,” including some “extremely violent misogyny.”
I expect you to back up your claims with evidence. But I already know that's expecting the impossible.
Because they've been his most vocal supporters and most joyous celebrants over his victory.I would like to know why.
Right wing women are clearly a threat. A threat to the privacy and personal autonomy over their own bodies.From your source:
I mean... this article affirms that Trump's election empowered misogynists. I would like to know why.
As I said many times, right-wing women are not considered a threat. Trump, Orban etc...are a threat because they are men.
Good.Because they've been his most vocal supporters and most joyous celebrants over his victory.
Chant things like "Your body, my choice". Threatening to take from women what misogynists believe belongs to them.Good.
I would like to know the causal link.
Trump's victory empowered men to do what exactly.
Because it's baked into the ideology.From your source:
I mean... this article affirms that Trump's election empowered misogynists. I would like to know why.
women don't typically stalk, harass, assault, abuse, or rape other women. Although they do propagate toxic ideology.As I said many times, right-wing women are not considered a threat.
Men who have a history of misogyny or sexual violence are obviously considered a threat to women.Trump, Orban etc...are a threat because they are men.