Now you're lying again. This is what
you wrote in your
Post #80:
"In this case, chemistry is a total, random, by chance process. This has been the primary model for many decades."
Are you serious ? Of course any chemistry is a by chance process as abiogenesis proposes. Can't you grasp that any chemistry brought about by chance is just that ?, I said NOTHING about Chemical interactions, everything about what brought them about. I am beginning to think senor fly that English isn't your first language
Shoot,
you repeated your ridiculous misconception just a few minutes ago in your
Post #119, where you described abiogenesis as:
"...happened by blind chance, by chance combinations of chemicals that "knew" all the information about the operation of an organism" Absolutely correct. Chance combinations of chemicals says nothing about how they react to one another , again, the nuances of English escape you. IF the combined chemicals, according to your, fantasy theory didn't have the information to operate an organism, then your fanciful organism couldn't exist, So, if you are arguing your precious chemicals did not contain the required information, then literally and figureatively your theory and your fanciful organism is dead.
So why are you calling it a straw man when
you continue to repeat it?
No, it is a straw man that you created because your ability to understand what is written is limited, and the issue has never been about chemical reactions
Yet you keep misunderstanding plain English, perhaps a high school night class would help
I did. I linked to Sayak's post where he described the scenarios and supporting experimental evidence (complete with linked citations). But you keep lying by saying none of it exists. Add in your other lies about reading scientific journals and books, and we have a disturbingly consistent picture of you.
How sad
You linked, and it failed as evidence. WE, interesting, do you now propose to speak for others, or is it that your understanding, once again, of English is scrambled ?
Odd behavior to see from someone claiming to be on the side of God.