From where do you get this notion of two sorts of love according to gender?
Masculine love is conditional love while female love is more unconditional. This distinction appears to be connected, not to gender; carrot on the stick, but to primary biological sexuality. The primary directive of sex is procreation; needs of the species. The pleasure of the individual or ego is the lure.
In terms of procreation, a mother has to carry her unborn child for nine months while pregnant, and then continue her care for her babies and her young and older children, for decades. Since, she is biologically in for the long haul, she cannot let the day by day struggles, like morning sickness or dirty diapers, or complaining children bother her She learns to accept things as they are; unconditional love.
The male's role in procreation is much shorter term. In the wilds of night life, the male may go out alone or roam in small packs, seeking a suitable mate, based on various conditions, such as availability. Once his goal to procreate is done, he may move on and not look back, unless certain pleasure conditions can be met by his date, for this repetitive needs. Conditional love is more for the short term needs of a repetitive; cyclic longer term drive. Conditional love will try to control/structure repetitive or cyclic drives, such as the wife setting conditions for sex.
Gender is more connected to the lure and the carrot on the string, that leads one to the primary directive, either consciously or unconsciously. Gender is a more social construct, as to how to structure the secondary desire carrot that leads to procreation both intentionally and unintentionally.
If you look at the transgender data, there are twice as many male to female transitions compared to female to male. This tells us this gender fad is due to a new social construct. This lopsided transitioning by biological sex, should have been expected, since the male has become the negative target of the political Left, with his role made less dominant in the family, also due to the political Left breaking up the nuclear family.
I would expect since the natural male is painted as toxic and contaminated, the children were raised more by the unconditional love of natural females. One would expect a net social movement toward acceptance of Lefty social aberrations, and the female construct dominating in terms of free market transitioning appeal. This must has been part of a long term Lefty plan. Don't let anyone fool you to think this is natural.
Females in sports, initially welcomed trans females; unconditional love, until they could see the primary sexual drive was not female, but was male; there to win and move on. It is not what is on the surface that matters in the end. If trans females were actually female down deep, they would had unconditional love for their female family; do not be a hog but share the glory even of you need to dumb down.
