Master Theory on Morality

[toyabacus]

Morality is a spiritual case based on a judgement on sense of mental agility and physical adaptability.

You are successful for good and\or forgiven for evil; a greater good is any combination.

Evil is considered a greater good if it counters itself, in which case it is not evil, but moral; so life is being evil whilst trying to do good, which is all of life as presented to evil.

If you are a greater good naturally, it's judged moral, but there are complications.

Adaptability to be the best physically and mental agility to do the best mentally with your mind, vessel and spirit.

Both adaptability and mental agility are a pair; mental agility relies on adaptability to be worthy of debate but adaptability is liberated because of mental agility, but can be burdened, in debate.

The excuse I hadn't adapted may stand but also may be penalised, and I made a mistake is another excuse, and what's penalised is a combination of the two. There are more examples.

Upon death a person's adaptability and mental agility are judged and spirits witness an abstraction as their spirit before entering a new life based on metaphorical good and evil of the entire vessel and mind.

The abstraction is what is classed a greater good payment, and a greater good test is the choice of next life.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

What are "the greater good" and "evil?"

 

[David T]

What are "the greater good" and "evil?"

What are "the greater good" and "evil?"

 

[Skwim]

Morality is a spiritual case based on a judgement on sense of mental agility and physical adaptability.

Really! Then present your evidence.

You are successful for good and\or forgiven for evil;

By whom?

Evil is considered a greater good if it counters itself,

Again, by whom?

If you are a greater good naturally, it's judged moral,

Boy, you sure have a lot of stuff being done some unknown person. Care to pull back the curtain?

Adaptability to be the best physically and mental agility to do the best mentally with your mind, vessel and spirit.

Both adaptability and mental agility are a pair; mental agility relies on adaptability to be worthy of debate but adaptability is liberated because of mental agility, but can be burdened, in debate.

The excuse I hadn't adapted may stand but also may be penalised, and I made a mistake is another excuse, and what's penalised is a combination of the two. There are more examples.

Upon death a person's adaptability and mental agility are judged and spirits witness an abstraction as their spirit before entering a new life based on metaphorical good and evil of the entire vessel and mind.

The abstraction is what is classed a greater good payment, and a greater good test is the choice of next life.

Unfounded assertions, which is what you've presented here, mean bupkis. Want to have an intelligent discussion, then you're going to have to do a lot better than simply make baseless declarations.

But in any case, welcome to RF.

.

 

[toyabacus]

Creative intelligence above our own, such as a solar or star system wide dream machine or anomaly.

A dreamscape and a magnetic opposite - able to neutralise thought with image.

An abstract mirror self - always truthful or righteous, but possibly stupid.

A creative intelligence exists which can communicate to you on a personal level, therefore, one that judges if we are good or evil is possible.

 

[Samantha Rinne]

Morality is a spiritual case based on a judgement on sense of mental agility and physical adaptability.

You are successful for good and\or forgiven for evil; a greater good is any combination.

Evil is considered a greater good if it counters itself, in which case it is not evil, but moral; so life is being evil whilst trying to do good, which is all of life as presented to evil.

If you are a greater good naturally, it's judged moral, but there are complications.

Adaptability to be the best physically and mental agility to do the best mentally with your mind, vessel and spirit.

Both adaptability and mental agility are a pair; mental agility relies on adaptability to be worthy of debate but adaptability is liberated because of mental agility, but can be burdened, in debate.

The excuse I hadn't adapted may stand but also may be penalised, and I made a mistake is another excuse, and what's penalised is a combination of the two. There are more examples.

Upon death a person's adaptability and mental agility are judged and spirits witness an abstraction as their spirit before entering a new life based on metaphorical good and evil of the entire vessel and mind.

The abstraction is what is classed a greater good payment, and a greater good test is the choice of next life.

Ummmm, how about no?

This is a terrible analysis of even basic morality. You have even failed to address what can be seen as good or evil, and why.

Let's start with fact one.

There is no such thing as "greater good." This is a rationalization for extremists throughout the centuries to do all kinds of evil. "I must kill these people for the greater good" or "I need to introduce an invasive species to a new country for the greater good" or "I'm going to rob from these doctors for the greater good." Maybe that medicine would be cheaper if you simply released it straight to the public. But maybe it would bypass all of those extra safety tests. Maybe those terrorists might be better off dead, but maybe making that decision would cause an international incident, and we'd have WWIII. Maybe trying to grow starfuit in a similar climate might seem like an ideal way to feed the hungry there, or maybe it would crowd out everyone there.

Unless you accept that what you are doing might be evil, this is not different from any other inferior morality. You will not hold back to consider the problems of your actions, so you won't find alternatives, nor will you research safeguards to mitigate against disaster. Human rationalization is not morality.

Research the Test of a Universalized Maxim, and tell me how effective that is. What everyone did it?

Does it really matter if the evil thing is "for the greater good" if it by nature causes massive destruction on one or more facets of life?

A dreamscape and a magnetic opposite - able to neutralise thought with image.

An abstract mirror self - always truthful or righteous, but possibly stupid.

Also, it really sounds like either you have some sort of English as a second language deal, or perhaps the beginnings of schizophrenia. You just have a strange way of putting things like you expect everyone to understand what you mean, when it's not so. Those are - not sentences.

 

[Sir Doom]

It appears you have misspelled the word 'mysterious' as 'master'.

 

[toyabacus]

A dream can encompass any memory, find guilt, and distinguish whether you are guilty with a logically precise and metaphorical dream. Dreams have the power to jump, in the sense of a super transition to higher state. Any memory and image found guilty of evil, can be replayed and judged, therefore, dream anomalies are capable of moral judgement - one standing at death.

Think of how the universe encompasses four more quarters intellectually. If we were to use all of our senses, we can only register 1\4 over a 4\4, at a time while the universe covers 4/4 at a time. It can make us experience a dream in a different vessel. This is some 4th dimension logic, white holes and black holes; dreams are miniature white holes which are holes duplicating - white holes can be in your mind and above it at the same time; take memory and feed memory.