Self confidence is good when it is deserved
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Self confidence is good when it is deserved
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
Ilona Stengel, The role of human emotions in science and research, YouTube.
If science strives for insensibility, then it strives for cruelty.
If science strives for insensibility, then it strives for cruelty.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
Journals are part of the research. The main part. It is nothing to prove the Riemann Hypothesis, it is 200000 times harder to publish it in a top journal.
Wrong. Science journalist probably have a background in science but it is not a requirement.
What is a requirement is to spot the difference between valid work and trash
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
What are your arguments, that I am producing trash?
I am not the editor.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
He does not present a reason for rejection. Simply writes: we do not want this.
A Vestigial Mote
Well-Known Member
Yeah right... what a crock. You were not trying to compliment @ChristineM with your appeal to her needing to re-read the thread because she is "innocent like a child." Lies. I call dishonesty. You are dishonest. So add "being honest" to your list of failed endeavors. It can go right alongside "get my pseudo-science BS published in a top journal because I am special and people just need to 'fell in love' with me." By the way - do you also send your cavalcade of YouTube videos along with the manuscripts you try to get published with these journals? I think you really should, because it just adds so much to your talking points.
Mods, do as you must. You won't get to see how little I care, but that doesn't mean my lack of caring doesn't exist! Hahahahaha... hoo boy. That's rich.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
I am dead meat.
A Vestigial Mote
Well-Known Member
That was actually more an admittance that I was "dead meat," because I was being outright derogatory - at least I think I was. But if you say so... sure. You can be "dead meat" too.
There ya go, don't want it, end of story. All the griping you do over not getting published... Do you not think it time to rethink your 'my work is perfect so they are all out to get me' attitude rather than blame professional publishers every time you fail?
Yes, of course it is. But to accept or reject a paper based on those emotions is to be irresponsible. Any editor that does so would be justifiably removed from their post.
Wrong. If you had a valid proof of the RH, you would be able to get it published immediately in any top journal.
The fact that a journal rejects your paper is sufficient proof you do NOT have a valid proof.
And, in fact, even a casual glance shows what you wrote to be unpublishable nonsense.
That is typical for papers submitted that aren't even worth the time to review. other excuses made for such: 'we don't have space', or 'perhaps another journal would be abetter choice'.
Any time you get those responses, it is a rejection. Believe me, I have had papers rejected.
Yes. I have read a few of your papers. They are all worthless and unpublishable.
I was trying to be gentle. But thanks.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
The special combination of logic and feelings is producing such a way of living (or dying) as Nihilism, it is defined by the conclusion, that there is no Absolute Truth. Everyone can have their own reality. No objective standards and viewpoints. The founder of Nihilism is Friedrich Nitzshe. This means, that a valid proof for Riemann's Hypothesis can not be published in a reputable journal: everybody feels like he is an Omniscient Suverene god in self-given right to reject even 1+2=3 if the latter feels not good. Just like a lady rejects a good rich candidate while dating, if she is suddenly bored.
Last edited: