• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Messiah Complex

GoodAttention

Well-Known Member
I should have made that more clear

All good.

Not all involuntary admissions under mental health have an element of paranoia. People who are later diagnosed with bipolar type I disorder can have their first presentation with delusions of grandeur.

Risk of harm isn’t always “physical harm”, and the law takes that into consideration. Neglecting your child should you have delusions of grandeur is also harm.

For example, a person experiencing a delusion of grandeur could be speeding in a car thinking all the other cars will move out of their way, or that they won’t get hit, or if they do the other cars will bounce off, or they have “extra lives” like they are playing Grand Theft Auto.

It is a psychosis, but not necessarily paranoid.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
All good.

Not all involuntary admissions under mental health have an element of paranoia. People who are later diagnosed with bipolar type I disorder can have their first presentation with delusions of grandeur.

Risk of harm isn’t always “physical harm”, and the law takes that into consideration. Neglecting your child should you have delusions of grandeur is also harm.

For example, a person experiencing a delusion of grandeur could be speeding in a car thinking all the other cars will move out of their way, or that they won’t get hit, or if they do the other cars will bounce off, or they have “extra lives” like they are playing Grand Theft Auto.

It is a psychosis, but not necessarily paranoid.
Those are severe manic or psychotic episodes. Merely believing you're the second coming of Christ isn't the same.
 

Eddi

Christianity, Taoism, and Humanism
Premium Member
All good.

Not all involuntary admissions under mental health have an element of paranoia. People who are later diagnosed with bipolar type I disorder can have their first presentation with delusions of grandeur.

Risk of harm isn’t always “physical harm”, and the law takes that into consideration. Neglecting your child should you have delusions of grandeur is also harm.

For example, a person experiencing a delusion of grandeur could be speeding in a car thinking all the other cars will move out of their way, or that they won’t get hit, or if they do the other cars will bounce off, or they have “extra lives” like they are playing Grand Theft Auto.

It is a psychosis, but not necessarily paranoid.
I think the point is, being grandiose is not in itself a mental health issue

Indeed it is within the normal range of human experience

Being a bit nuts is not the same as being clinically mentally unwell
 

GoodAttention

Well-Known Member
I think the point is, being grandiose is not in itself a mental health issue

Indeed it is within the normal range of human experience

Being a bit nuts is not the same as being clinically mentally unwell

Having delusions of grandeur can be pathological, which, in the context of psychosis, can lead to harm.

Being grandiose is mostly annoying for the people around you.
 

GoodAttention

Well-Known Member
Various people have claimed that and started religions over it, like the Baha'is. Just having an odd belief isn't a cause for concern unless it causes notable impairment in your daily life.

Yes, and adding to that it’s not only about impairment to yourself or the person, but also to those who are under your care or responsibility.

David Koresh is the best example.

Was he harming no one, himself, or the people around him?

Did he have a “delusion of grandeur” or only grandiose beliefs?
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
Yes, and adding to that it’s not only about impairment to yourself or the person, but also to those who are under your care or responsibility.

David Koresh is the best example.

Was he harming no one, himself, or the people around him?
I don't know enough about David Koresh to comment about him/his psychology.
 

Eddi

Christianity, Taoism, and Humanism
Premium Member
David Koresh should be the textbook case for “Messiah complex”, and I encourage anyone with an interest in this topic to read about him and his story.
I don't think he is typical though

If anything he's an extreme case

In that he managed to get followers

Probably other issues there as well
 

Jimmy

King Phenomenon
Yes, and adding to that it’s not only about impairment to yourself or the person, but also to those who are under your care or responsibility.

David Koresh is the best example.

Was he harming no one, himself, or the people around him?

Did he have a “delusion of grandeur” or only grandiose beliefs?
Koresh was a criminal who happened to have a Messiah complex, nothing more.
 

GoodAttention

Well-Known Member
I don't think he is typical though

If anything he's an extreme case

In that he managed to get followers

Probably other issues there as well

If you have an example of a “typical” case I would love to hear of it.

Otherwise what are we discussing here?
 
Top