One thing all these conspiracy attacks have in common, is these are attacks are against Casino Sciences, that use the same math as gambling casinos and politics. As a simple example, consider the nightly weather report. This is often wrong but people will still visit the same weather news, day after day. Is this rational? Would you buy a car from a car lot that sells lemons a few times a week? That would be irrational, yet casino math in science make that possible; buy into dogmatic proclamations to protect from uncertainty. Being wrong is now OK.
As another example, when Covid first started in the USA, we were told that masks did not work. This was mostly because there was a shortage and the limited supply needed to go to the front lines. There was a fear of hoarding and price gouging. Once masks started to appear in the supply chain, from China, now masks worked.
Later Science revealed that just wearing a mask did not always work. That did not matter to the Democrats. In hospitals, they have special mask material that electro-statically attract germs so the germs stick and are not be breathed in or out. These very efficient masks are replaced, hourly or even after a brief exposure. Having a cloth designer mask or a fake hospital blue mask, that has not been washed or changed for a week, was more there for show; trained dogs following orders to pacify fear and uncertainty.
Many people could see influence of politics on casino science, sort of morphing into something sinister, made possible by casino math; fear and uncertainty and the need for any form of direction. Back box uncertainty is the foundation of casino math, and that foundation of fear makes people too eager to accept anything that appear to appease fear. This is where Big Brother can move in and break laws under the guise of helping. As we analyze the past we can see how things morphed for the worse and unnecessary.
The way to break that bond between science and politics is to only allow rational science to establish rational dogma. Casino science needs to be subject to its own rules of uncertainty, and not allowed to become dogma. This way when casino politics tries to attach like a tick, the morph will still be called uncertainty and subject to debate. The Swamp tried to use social medial to shut down debate, to give the science of uncertainty the semblance of rational certainty and dogma, so a consensus of uncertainty could appear very certain.