-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
METHODIST CHURCH IS ACCESORY TO GENOCIDE. (In the George W. Bush police state).
- Thread starter totalfreedom
- Start date
greatcalgarian
Well-Known Member
Only the PM article, not on other conspiracy theories.totalfreedom said:
I do not buy GB police state and Methodist Church as well
totalfreedom
Member
So far, the Queen Elizabeth II police state sperheads the race to the gloval police state, second, or if you prefer, the backyard police state is George w. Bush's.
totalfreedom
Member
Oh, remember that Methodism has never severed itself from the Anglicans.
mr.guy
crapsack
And the Anglicans are also making us speak English, a well known Alpha Centurien secret language. So when the aliens come, they'll know to taget all english speakers. I guess George Bush's salvation lies in his poor grasp of the language.
Oh, and the Queen is possessed by the Devil; just like James Dean, George Burns and Charles Bronsen.
Oh, and the Queen is possessed by the Devil; just like James Dean, George Burns and Charles Bronsen.
totalfreedom
Member
This shows that Hitler didn't got that farr in espionage:
Domestic DefenseCould proposed new intelligence-gathering powers for the Pentagon lead to spying on U.S. citizens? The question is being asked as the White House considers new roles for the military inside America's borders.
Newsweek | October 6 2005
By Michael Isikoff and Mark Hosenball
The Pentagon would be granted new powers to conduct undercover intelligence gathering inside the United Statesand then withhold any information about it from the publicunder a series of little noticed provisions now winding their way through Congress.
Citing in part the need for greater latitude in the war on terror, the Senate Intelligence Committee recently approved broad-ranging legislation that gives the Defense Department a long sought and potentially crucial waiver: it would permit its intelligence agents, such as those working for the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), to covertly approach and cultivate U.S. persons and even recruit them as informantswithout disclosing they are doing so on behalf of the U.S. government. The Senate committees action comes as President George W. Bush has talked of expanding military involvement in civil affairs, such as efforts to control pandemic disease outbreaks.
Ref: http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/domestic_defense_new_intel_gathering.htm
And the Methodist Church is bussy with the homosexual-marriage stuff. They (methodists) are accesories to the above crime on the USA people.
Domestic DefenseCould proposed new intelligence-gathering powers for the Pentagon lead to spying on U.S. citizens? The question is being asked as the White House considers new roles for the military inside America's borders.
Newsweek | October 6 2005
By Michael Isikoff and Mark Hosenball
The Pentagon would be granted new powers to conduct undercover intelligence gathering inside the United Statesand then withhold any information about it from the publicunder a series of little noticed provisions now winding their way through Congress.
Citing in part the need for greater latitude in the war on terror, the Senate Intelligence Committee recently approved broad-ranging legislation that gives the Defense Department a long sought and potentially crucial waiver: it would permit its intelligence agents, such as those working for the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), to covertly approach and cultivate U.S. persons and even recruit them as informantswithout disclosing they are doing so on behalf of the U.S. government. The Senate committees action comes as President George W. Bush has talked of expanding military involvement in civil affairs, such as efforts to control pandemic disease outbreaks.
Ref: http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/domestic_defense_new_intel_gathering.htm
And the Methodist Church is bussy with the homosexual-marriage stuff. They (methodists) are accesories to the above crime on the USA people.
greatcalgarian
Well-Known Member
Give him/her some frubals, and he/she will be able to use those to bribe the way out of jail.:biglaugh:mr.guy said:
totalfreedom
Member
Looks like the atheist is bussy with his handlers.
Did you voted Bush?
Did you voted Bush?
Feathers in Hair
World's Tallest Hobbit
Everyone, please refrain from personal comments.
totalfreedom
Member
"Bush will veto anti-torture law after Senate revolt
London Telegraph | October 7 2005
By Francis Harris
The Bush administration pledged yesterday to veto legislation banning the torture of prisoners by US troops after an overwhelming and almost unprecedented revolt by loyalist congressmen.
The mutiny was the latest setback for an administration facing an increasingly independent and bloody-minded legislature. But it also marked a key moment in Congress's campaign to curtail the huge powers it has granted the White House since 2001 in its war against terrorism."
Would the Methodist Church validate this dictatorial reaction of its parishoner George w. Bush? it goes against all of the Methodist Church social credo.
London Telegraph | October 7 2005
By Francis Harris
The Bush administration pledged yesterday to veto legislation banning the torture of prisoners by US troops after an overwhelming and almost unprecedented revolt by loyalist congressmen.
The mutiny was the latest setback for an administration facing an increasingly independent and bloody-minded legislature. But it also marked a key moment in Congress's campaign to curtail the huge powers it has granted the White House since 2001 in its war against terrorism."
Would the Methodist Church validate this dictatorial reaction of its parishoner George w. Bush? it goes against all of the Methodist Church social credo.
s2a
Heretic and part-time (skinny) Santa impersonator
Hello totalfreedom,
Please read again the previous commentary for your own safety:
Lather, rinse, repeat.
To other thread respondents:
PDFTT.
Thanks.
Please read again the previous commentary for your own safety:
Lather, rinse, repeat.
To other thread respondents:
PDFTT.
Thanks.
totalfreedom
Member
s2a,
Just look at YOUR first post in the thread.
OK, to the point.
Are you going to debate on the issue of George W. bus commiting crimes agains mankind and the United Methodist Church being accesory to his genocide?
Or. Are you going to debate on the issue of atheism, that it is uncientific, due to the scientific discovery that materialism is a dogma? because matter is just concentrated energy, and energy is 99.999999999999 per cent empty space. You see, atheists are matherialists.
Just look at YOUR first post in the thread.
OK, to the point.
Are you going to debate on the issue of George W. bus commiting crimes agains mankind and the United Methodist Church being accesory to his genocide?
Or. Are you going to debate on the issue of atheism, that it is uncientific, due to the scientific discovery that materialism is a dogma? because matter is just concentrated energy, and energy is 99.999999999999 per cent empty space. You see, atheists are matherialists.
Feathers in Hair
World's Tallest Hobbit
"Matherialists" They worship mothers? Doesn't sound like a bad religion to me.
If you wish to debate atheism, take it to another thread. If you wish to debate about Bush, take it to the Politics thread. But trying to call the United Methodist Church an accessory to anyone makes about as much sense as claiming that all pagans have auburn hair and blue eyes, simply because this one pagan does. Is Bush in charge of the U.M.C? If he's not, then I can't find any sane reason that they are an 'accessory' to him.
If you wish to debate atheism, take it to another thread. If you wish to debate about Bush, take it to the Politics thread. But trying to call the United Methodist Church an accessory to anyone makes about as much sense as claiming that all pagans have auburn hair and blue eyes, simply because this one pagan does. Is Bush in charge of the U.M.C? If he's not, then I can't find any sane reason that they are an 'accessory' to him.
greatcalgarian
Well-Known Member
Atheist are materialists?? Atheists are not scientific in thinking?? Not many will agree with you. Try to stick to the methodist and GB. Do not get the wrath of a whole gang of atheists on this forum, though most of them are very gentle, and not as persuasive and insistent as S2atotalfreedom said:
totalfreedom
Member
"If you wish to debate atheism, take it to another thread. If you wish to debate about Bush, take it to the Politics thread."
Any other thing you might wish, please?
"Is Bush in charge of the U.M.C? If he's not, then I can't find any sane reason that they are an 'accessory' to him."
Because by the Bible, if a memeber is found making destructive things to others, he must be warned first, second, a third time and the parishoners must know of the harmful acts, and finaly, the criminal memeber must be excomunicated, this has not happened with George W. Bush, parishoner fo the United Methodist Church.
Clear?
Any other thing you might wish, please?
"Is Bush in charge of the U.M.C? If he's not, then I can't find any sane reason that they are an 'accessory' to him."
Because by the Bible, if a memeber is found making destructive things to others, he must be warned first, second, a third time and the parishoners must know of the harmful acts, and finaly, the criminal memeber must be excomunicated, this has not happened with George W. Bush, parishoner fo the United Methodist Church.
Clear?
totalfreedom
Member
"Atheist are materialists?? Atheists are not scientific in thinking?? Not many will agree with you."
Thats for shure, they claim to be "scientific".
But, how many do you know that are not materialists? Let them speack.
Thats for shure, they claim to be "scientific".
But, how many do you know that are not materialists? Let them speack.
totalfreedom
Member
In the meantime, the secret patritot act is waiting for another disaster, so that the George W. Bush police state implements it, without congressional approval.
[/font]
[font=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"A Brief Analysis of the Domestic Security Enhancement Act 2003, Also Known as Patriot Act II
By Alex Jones
www.infowars.com
(Posted Feb 10, 2003)[/font]
[font=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"Congressman Ron Paul (R-Tex) told the Washington Times that no member of Congress was allowed to read the first Patriot Act that was passed by the House on October 27, 2001. The first Patriot Act was universally decried by civil libertarians and Constitutional scholars from across the political spectrum. William Safire, while writing for the New York Times, described the first Patriot Act's powers by saying that President Bush was seizing dictatorial control."[/font]
http://infowars.com/print/patriot_act/alexs_analysis.htm
this is criminal, and the United methodist church hasn't excomunicated Bush.
[font=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"TOTAL POLICE STATE TAKEOVER
[/font][font=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]The Secret Patriot Act II Destroys What Is Left of American Liberty[/font]
[font=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][/font][font=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]The Secret Patriot Act II Destroys What Is Left of American Liberty[/font]
[/font]
[font=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"A Brief Analysis of the Domestic Security Enhancement Act 2003, Also Known as Patriot Act II
By Alex Jones
www.infowars.com
(Posted Feb 10, 2003)[/font]
[font=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"Congressman Ron Paul (R-Tex) told the Washington Times that no member of Congress was allowed to read the first Patriot Act that was passed by the House on October 27, 2001. The first Patriot Act was universally decried by civil libertarians and Constitutional scholars from across the political spectrum. William Safire, while writing for the New York Times, described the first Patriot Act's powers by saying that President Bush was seizing dictatorial control."[/font]
http://infowars.com/print/patriot_act/alexs_analysis.htm
this is criminal, and the United methodist church hasn't excomunicated Bush.