The believers in monotheistic faiths have their own misconceptions.
> They dismiss the religious experiences of Pagans, which merely undermines their own claims.
> They say we can't offer a hope of salvation, forgetting that if you don't believe in a God who goes round damning people to hell, you don't need saving in the first place.
> They claim paganism cannot provide spiritual comfort, which it certainly can.
> They claim that it cannot provide an ethical system. It's true we don't believe that the gods dictate rules of behaviour, but they don't need to: ethics can be established philosophically.
> They call our religion "primitive". Who's the more primitive: a Japanese professor who practices Shinto or a semi-literate member of the First Ranting Baptist Church of Hicksville?
I don't think I have any misconceptions about other religions. I was raised a Christian, which also implies that I know the Jewish scriptures, and I've studied the teachings of the Muslims, Sikhs, Buddhists, and Baha'i.
I wouldn't exactly say that you don't have any misconceptions, David. Rather, your criticisms apply to but some adherents of a particular monotheistic religion. They don't characterise those religions as a whole. Let me explain. You say that you've studied the Bahá'í Faith. Very cool! Then, one thing you may already be aware of is that my religion is unambiguously monotheistic, as an Abrahamic religion. Simultaneously, though, you proceed to make generalisations of the criticisms of your religions by monotheists. This creates misconception. So, with that in mind, allow me to address the criticisms individually, and from my own perspective:
#1) As a Bahá'í, I believe that all the various different religions (including Pagan/indigenous/folk religions) are, in general, Inspired by one and the same God. Specifically, the major religions are believed to be Revelations from God, their Founders/Major Figures are His Messengers, their various Holy Writings, His Word. Bahá'u'lláh puts it thusly, as recorded in His Gleanings:
“There can be no doubt whatever that the peoples of the world, of whatever race or religion, derive their inspiration from one heavenly Source, and are the subjects of one God. The difference between the ordinances under which they abide should be attributed to the varying requirements and exigencies of the age in which they were revealed. All of them, except a few which are the outcome of human perversity, were ordained of God, and are a reflection of His Will and Purpose.”
#2) Jumping off of #1, because the Bahá'í Faith teaches that all Religions — especially the major religions — are Revelations from God, salvation, I believe, is attained through turning to His Manifestations, especially Bahá'u'lláh (who I believe is the current one for our day and age). You see, to believe in Bahá'u'lláh — to be a Bahá'í — is not to renounce one's belief in any of the previous Messengers or Religions. God forbid! Rather, it is to sees them all as being chapters in the never-ending Faith of God. Thusly, all Religions (including Pagan/indigenous/folk religions) provide different paths to salvation! As for hell, I am taught explicitly that Heaven and Hell are metaphors for nearness to God and separation from Him; they are not literal places. Also, they are equally, if not more so achieveable in this life. Through devotion to one's Religion and righteous living.
#'s 3 and 4) To these two, I have the same exact answer:
Yes, of course they can! Once again, they flow from One and the Same Creator. Therefore, they will provide systems of ethics based upon which the adherents practice righteousness. In other words, the different Pagan paths teach people to live righteously. Devotion to your religion, whichever that may be, is extremely wonderful!
#5) The only sense in which I would the word “primitive” is to mean “ancient”, never to invalidate the manifold Pagan/indigenous/folk religions, or actually, any previous Religions or Holy Books. The Revelations of God are eternal, never-ending.
Now, with all of that out the way, let me ask you: who were you talking about when referring to monotheists, again?