kadzbiz
..........................
What's that supposed to mean?My sincere condolences.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What's that supposed to mean?My sincere condolences.
Ugliness and Beauty is subjective. Period.He may be a decade or more out of touch. For a while very very thin pale models that looked as if they were heroin users were very popular. They were often anorexic and definitely not healthy. The look was called "heroin chic". Luckily it did not last. The fashion industry if anything over compensated. Now there are models that are medically obese. Now if one complains about overweight models one is accused of " fat shaming".
You used to bodybuild and don't understand the difference in the two competitions, thinking that it's "basically a beauty competition"? How can you say that??I used to be into bodybuilding. I enjoyed the 70s bodybuilding the most and 90s was amazing. I lost interest after they made too many categories : under 202 lbs, classic, men's figure, bikini. Too many Arnold Classics
Prove it.Ugliness and Beauty is subjective. Period.
Ugliness and Beauty is subjective. Period.
You used to bodybuild and don't understand the difference in the two competitions, thinking that it's "basically a beauty competition"? How can you say that??
You're ugly, I'm beautifulProve it.
Bodybuilding isn't just about the size of the muscles. It's about definition and how well the muscles have been formed.Look at Frank Zane: he was smaller than most bodybuilders and still won Mr Olympia several times
He could easily be a male model
I will take that as an admission that you are wrong.You're ugly, I'm beautiful
Whatever makes you happy.I will take that as an admission that you are wrong.
Why did you write a post that looks like it violates the rules of the forum? Doing so is the same as admitting that you are wrong. You didn't think out your answer properly in your previous post.Whatever makes you happy.
Really? Are you sure? Give it some more thought and you might have an epiphany.Why did you write a post that looks like it violates the rules of the forum? Doing so is the same as admitting that you are wrong. You didn't think out your answer properly in your previous post.
The shortcoming was yours. That was why you wrote such a weak follow up post. Truly worthy of a second grader.Really? Are you sure? Give it some more thought and you might have an epiphany.
ok ok, obviously your only interest is being the winner, so congratulations, you win.The shortcoming was yours. That was why you wrote such a weak follow up post. Truly worthy of a second grader.
No, that is projection. That is why you made such a weak post and did not think about why your initial statement was wrong. You could not support your claim properly so you made lame donkeyed post.ok ok, obviously your only interest is being the winner, so congratulations, you win.
lol keep dreaming.No, that is projection. That is why you made such a weak post and did not think about why your initial statement was wrong. You could not support your claim properly so you made lame donkeyed post.
Oh my, such ignorance.lol keep dreaming.
Subjective -based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions.Prove it.
Personal attacked are a rule violationOh my, such ignorance.
That is an opinion. You need more than that.Subjective -based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions.
So yes ugly, beauty, art, etc all are subjective based on the viewer.
Is it? It seems to be more of an observation. It is rather strange that you said nothing of his personal attacks.Personal attacked are a rule violation
I did not personally attack you at all. I gave you a subjective (albeit rather hilarious) opinion to prove my point regarding ugliness and beauty that you asked me to prove. You on the other hand called me ignorant, a second grader, said I'm a decade or more out of touch, falsely accused me of violating the rules, twice said I'm wrong and accused me of posting "lame donkeyed" posts. Personally, I consider your caustic comments water off a duck's back to me. If you had any idea what I've gone through in my life, you'd realise why you're so insignificant to me. I even awarded you the win, but you still continued your antagonistic retorts.Is it? It seems to be more of an observation. It is rather strange that you said nothing of his personal attacks.