• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Mock Turtle world

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member

Not great when any of your relatives, who might know you well, will squeal on you as to who you actually are. But then his own words and actions betray him anyway. :oops:


My main complaint - that such extreme wealth in private hands is simply not good for society. Just as the handing down of power, through monarchies and such, isn't either.


In recent years, Voight has backed a number of Republican politicians, notably Donald Trump. In 2016, he defended Trump’s infamous “grab them by the *****” rant by claiming that he doesn’t know “too many men who haven’t expressed some sort of similar sexual terms towards women”. He also condemned “foul” actor Robert De Niro for saying he’d like to “punch” Trump in the face; “Voight is a nice guy, but he’s delusional,” De Niro said in response. In 2017, Voight said that he did not know “if God could reverse all the negative lies against Mr Trump, whose only desire was to make America great again”. In 2019, he called Trump America’s “greatest president since Abraham Lincoln”. When Trump lost the presidential election to Joe Biden in 2021, Voight backed his incorrect claims that his presidency was fraudulently stolen from him, and said that the situation was a “battle of righteousness versus Satan”.

Dementia perhaps setting in then? :(


A 2022 study, using a sample of 953 people in the US who meditated regularly, showed that over 10 percent of participants experienced adverse effects which had a significant negative impact on their everyday life and lasted for at least one month. According to a review of over 40 years of research that was published in 2020, the most common adverse effects are anxiety and depression. These are followed by psychotic or delusional symptoms, dissociation or depersonalisation, and fear or terror. Research also found that adverse effects can happen to people without previous mental health problems, to those who have only had a moderate exposure to meditation and they can lead to long-lasting symptoms. The western world has also had evidence about these adverse effects for a long time.

In 2015, my book with clinical psychologist Catherine Wikholm, Buddha Pill, included a chapter summarising the research on meditation adverse effects. It was widely disseminated by the media, including a New Scientist article, and a BBC Radio 4 documentary. But there was little media coverage in 2022 of the most expensive study in the history of meditation science (over US$8 million funded by research charity the Wellcome Trust). The study tested more than 8,000 children (aged 11-14) across 84 schools in the UK from 2016 to 2018. Its results showed that mindfulness failed to improve the mental wellbeing of children compared to a control group, and may even have had detrimental effects on those who were at risk of mental health problems.


There are plenty of explanations for most of the phenomena and if we are missing all explanations then so be it, rather than assuming the least likely one, of aliens. My view. :alien: :eyes: :p


In the end, what doomed our Homo relatives "was probably a combination of factors," Sawchuk said, "with a bit of random chance." As it happens, H. sapiens came perilously close to extinction at one point. A recent genetic analysis of more than 3,000 people in African and non-African groups revealed lower genetic diversity than expected. Scientists traced this to a breeding "bottleneck" between 813,000 and 930,000 years ago, with the global Homo population hovering at roughly 1,300 for more than 100,000 years.


Well, often it is down to how much stress we are capable of dealing with, and any solutions available. :shrug:
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member

Nasty idiot should be charged with attempted murder. I was involved in an incident as a child (probably aged 8-10) and attacked by a gang (3-4) of kids at a local park. When the dim leader of such failed to lash me with his belt (taken off him) he resorted to biting my face when we inevitably began to wrestle on the ground. Then his dim buddies joined in and began kicking my head about. It was only when I shouted out, "I can't see!", given my sight was so blurry from my eyes being so violently joggled about, that they stopped. And fortunately I got away with slight injuries. But anyone who does resort to kicking anyone in the head should be charged with attempted murder - given the seriousness of this and the likelihood of brain injury or even death. Why are people so stupid - even cops, like in this case? Was it because he was the male cop amongst other female cops and had to demonstrate his 'manhood'? Just sickening. And the cop so stupid - not realising that this might be filmed? No doubt he will be kicked out of the police - with nothing changing until the next twat does this, and the next.

PS The kid who attacked me I think later had his head chopped off or crushed after playing around with a street-light servicing platform.


The actress also described in detail her experiences of online abuse since leaving the show. "The aftermath has been something that I wasn't expecting, you know, the death threats and the rape threats towards not only myself but my daughter, and the threats of death to my son." She claimed that she was getting "dozens a day" on social media, including from people telling her to kill herself.

Such are often the affects of extreme fan-bias even if, as in this case, so disgusting and showing the morality of such people - 'this person is as innocent as a baby', often being their lament - and much like how many Michael Jackson fans simply cannot accept that he was most probably a paedophile and one who did sexually abuse children. In the SCD case, her experiences seem to be backed up by various other celebrities on the show as to how they might have been treated by other professional dancers. But I suspect that SCD is popular enough to survive this particular issue - which was likely - given any such fast-paced training regime involving many who have virtually no previous dance experience.


I'm not sure whether I saw the Blues Breakers live but I think I have their album. I did see Alexis Korner's Blues Incorporated once, at the Six Bells in Chelsea. All such made a welcome change from much of the Pop music around at the time.


Not going to be nice? He isn't nice. Period. In virtually everything he does or says. Because he is simply a nasty piece of work.

“The Radical Left Democrats rigged the presidential election in 2020 and we're not going to allow them to rig the presidential election in 2024,” he said.

Yeah, stick to that lie, you oaf. Since it is all you have - your lifebelt - but where you will sink because it is just another of your big lies. :eek:


Tate comes across as a twat, and any coercion that takes away from full consent should not be what one aims for in any such relationships.


Well he is a child intellectually, and is why he tends to use such childish language - apart from such appealing to his preferred audience. :baby:


Plenty of females do look younger than their age. I ran a poll here on RF some time back of a female model (in TV adverts) who was about 22 at the time and where some thought she was as young as 13. And I have probably also cited a report as to even experts on female morphology getting it wrong, with the majority of these underestimating the ages of females more than getting it right, so how would the general public fare? Almost as easy no doubt as for those older to look younger too.

In court cases, as to illegal imagery, it is often down to a jury assessing the appearance of any individual involved - as to being younger than 18, for example - so how fair is this - especially when the police might present images of adults (over 18) but presented as being 13 or 14? o_O
 
Last edited:

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
Dogs Can Smell Your Stress, and It Seems to Make Them Sad

No surprise to most dog owners probably, and I cited an example of this some time back when a neighbour's dog came and rested her head on my lap whilst I waited for an ambulance after I was hit on the head by my car bonnet.

 
Last edited:

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member

One of Switzerland’s most stunning spots has become the latest to try to limit tourist access, in a bid to protect the environment from becoming overrun by Instagrammers. Above the famous resort of Zermatt, the Riffelsee lake is more than picture perfect. Not only can you see the iconic Matterhorn in all its glory, you can capture its reflection in the glacial waters of the lake. In high season, the rack railway takes thousands of tourists up there every single day, all of them intent on the ultimate shot. And in June and July, when spring finally arrives in the high Alps, tourists can also see the alpine flowers that thrive up there at 2,800m (9,200ft): edelweiss, gentian, and alpine golden primrose. At least they could. But now the hordes of tourists disgorged by the railway every few minutes are taking their toll, tramping across the pastures towards the lake and crushing the flowers. Edelweiss has not been seen around the Riffelsee for some years.

Ah, the advent of digital photography (not having to carry around a weighty SLR and various lenses), the internet (so as to find out all that one might want to know but perhaps being remote from such), and social media (that which often drives the sillier aspects of our lives), so as to ****-up so many environments and where many will simply be taking obvious short-cuts as to experiencing that which many of us worked so hard to get. Sour grapes? o_O


If you can’t bear it, skip this paragraph, as I quote from the Inescapable Truth, research from palliative care professionals and relatives who have seen the worst: “Some will retch at the stench of their own body rotting. Some will vomit their own faeces. Some will suffocate, slowly, inexorably, over several days, their last moments of life disfigured by terror. Any one of us might suffer such a fate.” A nurse describes a woman with “tumours in her abdomen. It was basically dying flesh and she was still with us. Her family’s memory of her was her decomposing while she was still alive.” The report estimates 17 people a day die in unrelieved agony.

A no-brainer for many of us, as to human rights, and mostly it seems to be religious influences that goes against this other than many seeing some kind of pressure then existing for some to be coerced or even forced, in their view, so as to take their own lives - perhaps seeing themselves as being a burden on others - but where this is mostly not the case.


Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov. I first read it at 16 and cannot overstate the impact the prose had on me. That beginning! That middle! That end! I have read it five or six times now and it charts the 180-degree turn my moral compass has performed. At 16, I was cheering on the love story. Now, I read it as the slow assassination of a child.

Wow! How any would see this as a love story is odd, even at 16. Lust, craving, exploitation, and abuse might be what first comes to mind for most. :oops:


In a 6-3 ruling, the supreme court on July 1 ruled that presidents cannot face criminal charges over official acts, and that evidence of official acts cannot be used in a prosecution on private matters. Legal experts say Judge Juan Merchan is unlikely to grant Trump’s request to toss the verdict, since much of the conduct at issue predated Trump’s 2017-21 presidency and relates to personal matters, not official acts.

Seems easy enough - prior to him becoming president and not relating to official acts. Tough SCOTUS!


The obvious suspects - Russia being one? o_O
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member

Donald Trump's vice-presidential candidate JD Vance has defended resurfaced comments in which he called Democratic politicians a "bunch of childless cat ladies with miserable lives". His remarks, made in 2021, have been roundly criticised this week, with Hollywood actress Jennifer Aniston among those to have hit out at the 39-year-old Republican.

Following in the steps of the great(?) man himself, as to lowering the tone of everything, and making new friends of course by doing so - miaow! :tigerface:


Whether you're planning a refreshing dip, a leisurely stroll along the coastline or a run along a canal, it's crucial to know how to stay safe. This knowledge can be the difference between a safe outing and a tragic accident. Research shows that following these five simple steps are highly effective. They are easy to remember and can be done by anyone, regardless of swimming ability or whether you are in freshwater or saltwater. First, keep your head back with your ears submerged to keep your airways open. Resist the urge to panic, try to relax and breathe normally. Gently move your hands paddling them as this will aid in keeping afloat. Don't fret if your legs sink, everyone's buoyancy is different. Finally, spread your arms and legs as this really helps maintain your stability in the water.


Why is this happening? The Pew report addressed that, too. The 770 adults, ages 18-49, from a national sample who said that they were unlikely to have kids were given a list of possible reasons and asked whether each one was a major reason for not having children. Were they worried about the costs? Yes, more than a third, 36 percent, said they couldn’t afford to raise a child. Were they concerned about the environment? Yes, 26 percent said that was a major factor. What about the state of the world? Yes, 38 percent said that was a major consideration. Did they want to focus on other things? That was a big one: 44 percent said that was a major reason they were unlikely to ever have children. Many people want to find a partner before they have children. For 24 percent, not finding the right partner was a major reason they were unlikely to have kids. Other reasons mattered, too, but to fewer people. One in five, 20 percent, said that they don’t really like kids. Nearly as many, 18 percent, said they had negative experiences with their own family growing up. Thirteen percent pointed to infertility or other medical reasons. Of those who had a spouse or partner, 11 percent said their spouse or partner did not want to have children. The number-one reason, by far, for not having kids was simple: They just don’t want to. Close to 6 in 10, 57 percent, said that was a major reason.

 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member

Slowed right down, the video shows that the police were attacked by these two men, and no doubt were within their rights to use tasers, but as to why the first suspect was manhandled so is open to questions, given perhaps the confrontation might have been avoided. And the kicking and stamping is still not excusable even if understandable. These people are supposed to be trained professionals not reverting to thuggery when they feel threatened.


Trump’s view of “us” and “them” is at its clearest in his Argument for America, the ad with which he concluded his successful 2016 presidential campaign. It is quite compelling in the way of something that you know is bad for you but you can’t tear yourself away from. It is entirely repetitive, like a drumbeat, organised around an antagonism between “the establishment” and “the American people” culminating in the assertion: “I am doing this for the people and for the movement, and we will take back this country for you and we will make America great again.”

'One merely holds one's nose, dear boy!' o_O

This contrast between “the establishment” and “the people” is, of course, a classic populist trope. Trump’s version is distinctive in three ways. The first is the elasticity of “the establishment”, which includes outsiders (Chinese, immigrants, globalists), conventional politicians (the Washington “swamp”) and anyone who opposes him (the media, judges, scientists). The second is his autocratic assertion of agency. Unlike Obama’s empowering “yes we can”, Trump implies that people themselves can’t buck the establishment alone. They need him as their saviour. Trump is more “yes I can”. The third is that “the people” are defined in national/cultural (and implicitly racial) rather than class terms. This last is critical because it allows Trump to use his great wealth to connect himself to the people rather than it serving to distance him. He and his family are portrayed as rough and ready “ordinary guys” whose success exemplifies the American dream. And it’s not just that he uses his wealth to make himself “one of us”. It also allows him to claim that he works “for the people” while his opponents can be bought and are “controlled fully by the lobbyists, by the donors and by the special interests”.

Yeah, the language tends to get a bit boring after hearing it so often - apart from the gullibility of those taken in by this idiot.

In sum, Trump thrives because of, not despite, his violations. Each time he is upbraided for them, he simply doubles down by rejecting his critics (whether journalists, lawyers or judges) as part of the establishment – an ever-radicalising politics of transgression. Moreover, rather than be ashamed by the ensuing criticisms and sanctions, he and many of his supporters parade them as proof that they are willing to suffer establishment attacks on behalf of the people. “Felon” becomes a badge of honour, and “I support the felon” becomes a popular meme.

And of course his lies - as to the 'stolen election' - which he cannot go back on simply because this will then admit him to the fallibility club, where most of us are. :oops:
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member

Probably for many, his theories are too far gone to be rehabilitated.


Panetta, who served in various capacities under nine US presidents, has witnessed growing polarisation and a coarsening of political discourse. “It’s obvious that America in these last number of years has become more divided, more partisan, and our democracy in many ways has become much more dysfunctional as a result of those divisions,” he added. “Kamala Harris presents a message that we could have a better America in the future, and we need that message of hope. “The message of Trump, whether he wanted to change it or not, still gets trapped by his own sense of retribution, vengeance and going after people. That’s not what Kamala Harris is about and so the American people are going to have a real choice here in November to decide what kind of direction we want for our country. The more defined that difference is, the better the chances are that the Democrats can win.”


Many of us are probably not that sure what might work to defeat Trump, given that we are not too sure as to the abilities of so many in the US to assess truth from fiction. When about a quarter or so still apparently believe in a literal interpretation of the Bible and associated nonsense - as to timescales and/or evolution and such, for example. :oops:


Ah, that loveable old Fox - NOT!


No matter what occurred previously, no excuse for behaving like a thug.


One example may be the focus today on loneliness in late life, which is inspired by studies showing that people with fewer social connections tend to have more health issues. “There may be other reasons why people have fewer friends and also poor health,” says Brent, “and we may need more inspired solutions to improve their wellbeing than programs targeting loneliness itself. Plus, as we have learned in the pandemic, increasing people’s number of social contacts is not without risk.” This is not to say, of course, that positive social contacts can no longer brighten the days in our twilight years. Like other animals, when we’re young and healthy and natural selection is in full force, we are eager to make friends and find a mate even if that comes at a cost. Then, when we get older and enter the selection shadow, we can afford to be choosier and shrink our social networks to the size of our comfort zone. With little fitness left to gain, evolved adaptations may no longer be helping us. But close friends and family certainly can.

Perhaps the inevitable boredom occurs, and as to not much changing for the better when they look around at the world in general or even their locality. Why bother?


Words have immense power, and the kindness we express through them can impact the lives of those around us. "I believe in you," "You make a difference," and "I appreciate you" are three of the kindest things you can say to someone. These phrases encourage, affirm value, and express deep appreciation, contributing to a more supportive and compassionate world. Integrating these expressions into our daily interactions can uplift others, build stronger relationships, and foster community and belonging.

Fine, but one has to believe those mean this when one might know so many more can never feel this way. o_O
 
Top