Modern man like footprints found, evolution theory in doubt.

[Revoltingest]

....phony science claims they can't support.

Like saying ancient footprint fossils are of modern
humans based upon the pictures which can't be seen?

 

[dad1]

Without clear pix, tis not possible to guess.

The folks studying it hazarded guess as to what it was, based on what they saw. They could not even consider that it could have maybe been pre flood man, and even when they declared the prints to be made from some ancestor of man, that messed up their evo timeline.

 

[Revoltingest]

The folks studying it hazarded guess as to what it was, based on what they saw. They could not even consider that it could have maybe been pre flood man, and even when they declared the prints to be made from some ancestor of man, that messed up their evo timeline.

Tis odd that we can't see the pix.

 

[dad1]

Like saying ancient footprint fossils are of modern
humans based upon the pictures which can't be seen?

No. They don't say that. Neither do I. I point out they do not know. I ask how would they know IF the prints were from pre flood men?

 

[Revoltingest]

No. They don't say that. Neither do I. I point out they do not know. I ask how would they know IF the prints were from pre flood men?

How are we to discuss claims about footprints which we can't see?

 

[dad1]

Tis odd that we can't see the pix.

In post 22 someone provided pics.

 

[Revoltingest]

In post 22 someone provided pics.

Thanx!
Those don't look like human (modern or otherwise) tootsies made them.

 

[ImmortalFlame]

Jesus is older than that. The lady in Prov 8 also. There are witnesses in all of the time man or God was alive, not just today.

But the Bible itself is not a first-hand account of anyone who lived at that time - it was written at least 70 years after.

No, I referred to the percentage of the total creatures alive...NOT to how many creatures maybe would get fossilized in today's nature!

I think you're confused.

False you showed us you totally missed the point.

So what is your point if it isn't "fossilization is rare"?

How rare something gets fossilized in the present state is a non issue actually.

Then why did you bring it up?

You are aware that none of these objects made it even close to one light week away right!?

Of course, but to say our knowledge and influence is only limited to earth is total cobblers. We've landed a rover on Mars.

 

[metis]

Give the specific examples if you want to do more than rail and whine.
Belief based, that is the issue.

Study what, how they admit not knowing? Study their cult like religion? What, you thought whoever memorized the most fibs was the smartest?


Why would I care what a church teaches? The issue is what support you have for the anti creation stories of fake news science stories do you have? The answer is clear...none at all.

The above is a near perfect example why I'm so glad I left the fundamentalist Protestant church I belonged to five decades ago that was chock full of ignorance, and sometimes even dishonesty, about science and how it works in the real world, not their imaginary one.

 

[Revoltingest]

The above is a near perfect example why I'm so glad I left the fundamentalist Protestant church I belonged to five decades ago that was chock full of ignorance, and sometimes even dishonesty, about science and how it works in the real world, not their imaginary one.

To leave such a church is fine, but you must also give up that way of thinking too.



Oh, come on....you invited this mirth.

 

[SkepticThinker]

It is of no consequence if some men deny and do not accept the record God gave man. It is a real concern however when little men make big phony science claims they can't support.

Let us know when you can back up your claims then, little man.

 

[Faithofchristian]

First, What makes you think those foot prints are modern man's?

Whether your creationists or not, About everyone seems to think that there was only one flood being the flood of Noah's.

What if there was another flood way before the flood of Noah's. And way before Adam and Eve.

What if before you came to be in this world, that back before this world came to be, people were a spirit. Not having flesh or blood, but a spirit, But with some substance, that when they walk they left behind foot prints.

And at this time, in being a spirit, The dinosaurs were there also, but they were of flesh and blood beings.

Of course I really don't believe you will believe this, it sounds like alot of nonsense Right.
This is just food for thought.

 

[Sapiens]

You had it right the first time, "sounds like alot of nonsense Right."

 

[Faithofchristian]

You had it right the first time, "sounds like alot of nonsense Right."

Seeing by the name your giving ( Sapiens) speaks for itself.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

They are a gift of God. All we need to do is accept. The evidences are all through history. When we sincerely ask God, He removes the blindness men have so they can see.
Believe what you like The so called science beliefs are what is being roasted here.

Is to.
My argument is that your arguments are not supported and you evidence that.
Then cease and desit, and come on over to the winning side.

There is no evidence that demonstrates the existence of God. You believe there is evidence, but believing it doesn't make that evidence exist. The Bible is evidence that ancient people believed something and wrote it down. The mere existence of the Bible is not evidence for what is claimed in the Bible. Christians accept that on faith, because there is no evidence for it otherwise.

Science keeps holding up really well. What is roasted here are your opinions.

My arguments are supported. I'm on the winning side.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Something that dad1 clearly don’t understand.

You understand what evidences and where they exist and where they don’t exist. dad1 is clearly incapable of it. Especially with him making claims that law of physics being different before the global flood.

And yes, he is repeatedly making one false claim after another.

Absolutely. He has beliefs, assumptions and a desire that those beliefs and assumptions are true. What he doesn't have is any evidence that he can share with anyone. Even himself.

False claims are all he and those like him have. It is a phenomenon of the fundamentalist view that fundamentalists demand evidence from others, but can't provide it themselves. They don't understand what evidence is, how to use it or what it says. They make claims that don't hold up outside of emotional appeals and rhetoric. A person can believe without all that fantasy reinforcement. A person can believe in something--in God--and accept what we learn through science.

 

[Sapiens]

Seeing by the name your giving ( Sapiens) speaks for itself.

Yes indeed, I am so glad that your latin is up to the task.

 

[dad1]

Thanx!
Those don't look like human (modern or otherwise) tootsies made them.

That could mean that pre flod human feet were different than modern man's. Or it could mean some pre flood ape made em..etc. Who knows?

 

[dad1]

Let us know when you can back up your claims then, little man.

Already done..the claim science doesn't know is demonstrated often here.

 

[dad1]

First, What makes you think those foot prints are modern man's?

Nothing. They don't know.

Whether your creationists or not, About everyone seems to think that there was only one flood being the flood of Noah's.

Bingo.

What if there was another flood way before the flood of Noah's. And way before Adam and Eve.

?

What if before you came to be in this world, that back before this world came to be, people were a spirit. Not having flesh or blood, but a spirit, But with some substance, that when they walk they left behind foot prints.

The bible tells us what went on, and how man was created. No what iffing needed.

And at this time, in being a spirit, The dinosaurs were there also, but they were of flesh and blood beings.

Man was flesh. Woman was made from a bone...not a ghost.
Get a grip.