Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Wrong again dad, you are the one making an insane assumption. Until you find evidence for you belief you have nothing.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Modern man like footprints found, evolution theory in doubt.
- Thread starter dad1
- Start date
Wrong again dad, you are the one making an insane assumption. Until you find evidence for you belief you have nothing.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
There is no point. Until you get over your fear and learn what is and what is not evidence you will never understand.
Are you ready to learn? I am ready to help you.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
dad1
Active Member
There is no assumption involved in recognizing the way science looks at the past and constructs models. If you want to pretend they do not assume a same nature and laws for the past for the models, try and make a case for that claim.
But we saw you spammed a video on the flood, and offered no points in it to defend or discuss. You want to sell propaganda rather than have a reasoned debate.
For the lurkers though, the supposed evidences against Noah's flood are really outdated old wive's tales, so it is no wonder this poster dared not put any specific points on the table and try to defend them.
dad1
Active Member
Chapter and verse that says we should not use punctuation or capitols letters to accent things?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Wrong again dad, that is not an assumption. Is English your second language? You seem to have quite a bit of trouble with it. It is a conclusion drawn from evidence.
You on the other hand have no reliable evidence for your truly insane assumption. You are merely accusing others of your sins.
Wrong again. There was no spam. Once again, you are having trouble with English. Why don't you PM me your posts first and I will help you with them. There was no propaganda either. I can help you but you need to want to learn.
Wrong again, but you have no clue as to what is and what is not evidence. You are afraid to even discuss the topic of evidence. Any lurkers out there can see your fear. Appealing to them does not help you in the least. You merely give them another reason to laugh.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
That is not what you did wrong. It looks like Christine saying that your memory was beginning to work was not correct.
dad1
Active Member
It is a belief that is imposed onto evidences, and no evidence at all exists for your mother of all fables.
You are in no position to comment on the unknown.
Deny it all you like. When you cannot discuss certain points in some movie, it is useless to post one.
What is evidence should be evident when it is presented to us. Alluding endlessly to supposed evidence that does not exist is pretentious twaddle.
dad1
Active Member
Here is the deal, if I FEEL like posting in big letters I WILL do so, what are you going to do about it? Ha.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Nope, that is what you do. That is your sin.
Since I at least understand the scientific method I am far more qualified that you are. Once again, I can help you with that.
I am not denying anything. When you are ready to learn what is and what is not evidence then you we can discuss the video that was beyond your ability to understand.
No, you constantly show that not to be the case. You deny evidence, mainly due to your fear. The evidence is there but you will simply deny it. You don't want to learn what is and what is not evidence because then you would have to openly lie when you deny it. Now you can at least pretend that you are not lying.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
There is not much that I can do, except point out that you are merely a Christian of convenience, but then we already knew that. An actual Christian would avoid harming others when they could.
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
Prove it.
Do you not see the hilarious contradiction in what you just said?
"I believe the Bible because the prophecies are 100% true, Jesus is alive and I HAD to believe it."
"The basis for models of the past is only an unproven, unsupportable belief."
So, if the second sentence is true, answer these questions:
1) How do you know any prophecies were fulfilled (or even made)?
2) How do you know Jesus ever existed?
3) Why do you HAVE to believe anything the Bible asserts about the past?
Last edited:
Yes we know nature has existed for many billions of years. You are the one claiming other wise.
Chronology of the universe - Wikipedia
BIOdotEDU
Radiocarbon dating - Wikipedia
Your turn to provide evidence for your claim of god magic
Last edited:
This had been repeatedly explained to you in simple tems and bullet points for the last 10 days. Seems your deliberate ignorance is more profound than i thought.
Simple, i will just ignore your ignorance
Like so many so called Christians, it is in name only, his actions are very unchristian.
'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'.. Gandhi.
Matthew 7:12
Romans 12:10
Romans 14:14
Philippians 2:3
Titus 2:7
1 Peter 2:17
1 Corinthians 10:23-24
1 Corinthians 10:33
It is called respect and consideration. You would do well to read your bible and understand what it means
dad1
Active Member
OK, let's break down a typical SZ post. (My comments in red)
Insult, strawman accusation.
Calling a bible based belief an insane assumption for no apparent reason..
Denying that a movie posted as evidence by him was not discussed or any points raised from the video to be examined and debated.
Pretending he can debate issues somewhere in a closet.
Justifying spam video and refusal to cite relevant points in it, followed by the usual pretense of being able to teach posters something real smart.
...
Refusing to offer any evidence, but pretending he has some monopoly on what evidence is while other posters do not.
Insulting pretense repeated.
False allegations with appeal to imagined popularity.
Further appeal to imagined popularity, followed by insulting allusion to some secret superior case that can never be posted.
.
Insult, strawman accusation.
Insulting smear suggesting the empty posts were somehow misunderstood due to incompetency, followed by the usual unsupported allusion to some supposed evidence that never is posted.
Calling a bible based belief an insane assumption for no apparent reason..
Accusing posters of sins.
Denying that a movie posted as evidence by him was not discussed or any points raised from the video to be examined and debated.
Insulting accusation to divert from his refusal to debate issues.
Pretending he can debate issues somewhere in a closet.
Justifying spam video and refusal to cite relevant points in it, followed by the usual pretense of being able to teach posters something real smart.
...
Refusing to offer any evidence, but pretending he has some monopoly on what evidence is while other posters do not.
Insulting pretense repeated.
False allegations with appeal to imagined popularity.
.
Further appeal to imagined popularity, followed by insulting allusion to some secret superior case that can never be posted.
.
dad1
Active Member
Respect needs to be earned.
dad1
Active Member
You think you know, based on assuming time in deep space so that light takes great time to get here. Also by assuming a current nature in the past you cannot begin to evidence.