• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Monotheists, where is your evidence?

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
Then what did you mean?
That "everything" is meaningless if you try to break it down.

But then you went on to expand on this in ways that would be inconsistent with monotheism.
If you say so. I don't think it is.

Ah - so this has all been off-topic?
I don't think so.

"Mono" implies "one". "One" is a quantity. The distinction between monotheism and polytheism is entirely a matter of quantity. If God is not quantifiable, then monotheism and polytheism are indistinguishable from each other.

Also, quantity is implicit in that word "only" that you like to use.
If you say so. "Mono" also means "only," and "only everything" doesn't imply any quantity to me.

So none of what you've said has actually been about god (i.e. the subject of the thread), but only about your image of god?
I've never implied otherwise. But the image of god is essentially god for the purposes of this thread (the purposes of communication).

I don't see how what you describe works. If your form of "all-powerful" implies that everything has been "actualized"... i.e. that there is nothing that hasn't happened, yet there are plenty of things that haven't happened.
I give up. :)
 
Top