That "everything" is meaningless if you try to break it down.Then what did you mean?
If you say so. I don't think it is.But then you went on to expand on this in ways that would be inconsistent with monotheism.
I don't think so.Ah - so this has all been off-topic?
If you say so. "Mono" also means "only," and "only everything" doesn't imply any quantity to me."Mono" implies "one". "One" is a quantity. The distinction between monotheism and polytheism is entirely a matter of quantity. If God is not quantifiable, then monotheism and polytheism are indistinguishable from each other.
Also, quantity is implicit in that word "only" that you like to use.
I've never implied otherwise. But the image of god is essentially god for the purposes of this thread (the purposes of communication).So none of what you've said has actually been about god (i.e. the subject of the thread), but only about your image of god?
I give up.I don't see how what you describe works. If your form of "all-powerful" implies that everything has been "actualized"... i.e. that there is nothing that hasn't happened, yet there are plenty of things that haven't happened.