Not really. Just because we are too flawed to percieve aspects of Truth without help, doesn't mean that Truth is variable.Exactly which means truth is a pathless land that is constantly changing and different for everyone.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Not really. Just because we are too flawed to percieve aspects of Truth without help, doesn't mean that Truth is variable.Exactly which means truth is a pathless land that is constantly changing and different for everyone.
Once again, not neccisarily. We who believe that scripture is true read about how God spoke directly to men, or through prophets who could demonstrate His power, and they still fell quite often.Yes it would. It would convince the 5 billion people who don't believe that God's word is actually right, for one.
Not really. Just because we are too flawed to percieve aspects of Truth without help, doesn't mean that Truth is variable.
It's not about versions of truth. Its about me doing the best I can to search out Truth for myself. If I must choose a label or "version" than Christianity is the best. As long as you take it by it's literal definition and don't add anything to it. I am a follower of Christ. Nothing more nothing less.And let me guess which version of the truth you think is "THE truth"
This makes no sense at all.Because that would get in the way of free will, which is the whole point of existence.
The Vatican is an organization that excommunicates women for attempting to become priests but does not excommunicate male priests for raping children. It excommunicates doctors who perform abortions to save a mother's life--even if the mother is a nine-year-old girl raped by her stepfather and pregnant with twins-- but it did not excommunicate a single member of the Third Reich for committing genocide. Are we really obliged to consider such a diabolical inversion of priorities to be evidence of an alternative "moral" framework?
--Sam Harris
But if you build your [expletive] church on claims of moral authority
And with force impose it on others in society
Then you, you [expletive]s can expect some [expletive] wrath
When it turns out you've been [expletive]ing us in our [expletive] [expletive]s
Let me clarify. God created all creation with the soul purpose of fellowship. You can't have fellowship with robots. Therefore the point of everything is that we have the free will to fellowship with God. Plus the comment you quoted was in response to saying that God should run the vatican, and God putting himself in the (ironically) all-powerful shoes of the pope, would impenge on free will more than when he actually did commune with us mortals(he always allowed people to choose, which hasn't always been the case with the pope). I guess I might be splitting hairs, but it seemed like an important point at the time.This makes no sense at all.
And we wouldn't have "the free will to fellowship with God" if God ran his church directly? Why not?Let me clarify. God created all creation with the soul purpose of fellowship. You can't have fellowship with robots. Therefore the point of everything is that we have the free will to fellowship with God.
The Pope doesn't allow people to choose? I don't know about you, but the Pope has never once prevented me from having free will. Has he done that to you? If so, how?Plus the comment you quoted was in response to saying that God should run the vatican, and God putting himself in the (ironically) all-powerful shoes of the pope, would impenge on free will more than when he actually did commune with us mortals(he always allowed people to choose, which hasn't always been the case with the pope). I guess I might be splitting hairs, but it seemed like an important point at the time.
Ummm.....the Crusades LOL. Join or die vs. join because I love you and want to fellowship with you.The Pope doesn't allow people to choose? I don't know about you, but the Pope has never once prevented me from having free will. Has he done that to you? If so, how?
The messages can be found on the official Vatican website and in the numerous encyclicals of the Popes.
The path can be corrupted, yes but Truth cannot be corrupted. That is why it is every person's responsibility to search out the Truth for themselves instead of simply trying to find the best path.
It's not about versions of truth. Its about me doing the best I can to search out Truth for myself. If I must choose a label or "version" than Christianity is the best. As long as you take it by it's literal definition and don't add anything to it. I am a follower of Christ. Nothing more nothing less.
Unless the Truth you believe in tells you that it's your job to get other people to believe. I'm not trying to start a debate on the subject, just wanted to share my viewpoint.Which is fine as long as you don't assume someone must have done something wrong if they didn't find the same truth you did.
Not what they say are the messages, after all, we've just seen they are less than moral. The message from the actions described in the OP. What moral message do you get from those policies?
Cause that hat really sucks. Add a cloak to it with some eye holes and you have.............So why isn't God himself running the Vatican?