No, it is not based upon the idea of reincarnation. That is wrong. It is based actually more in psychology, before there was a field of psychology. It's basically about patterns of behavior that creates your destiny. If you repeat the same practices, say a chronic liar, you're patterning your life such that it will generate consequences. That's karma. That's not based upon life after death. That's based upon living our life out of balance with the way of the universe, or "God's will", if you prefer.Yes, I know what karma is. While I do believe in the biblical concept concerning one reaps what they sow; karma is different. Karma is based on the belief of reincarnation and that one’s actions or behavior in life will determine the status of their next reincarnated life.
Now, where reincarnation comes in, that is simply to say that those patterns we establish in this life will follow us into the next. Just as if we patterned those things in our early teens and never did anything to correct or change those patterns, they will continue into adulthood and we will reap the consequences.
So too in Christianity. You imagine you can just magically all be perfect and no consequences for your actions in this life when you appear in the afterlife? Jesus' blood means you don't have to change the patterns of your behaviors, thoughts, and actions, and such? It's just all magically erased without any behavioral changes? Doesn't scripture itself teach about purifying the dross? It's the same thing. Everyone will give an account. That's karma, more or less. Just different language for saying the same thing.
That is of course your interpretation of that one verse making a whole theology out if it. Yet, reincarnation itself was something some early Christians believed. One of the church fathers himself did, in his own way of understand that.Reincarnation is unbiblical and contrary to the biblical truth of resurrection and that humans have one life, then comes the judgement. Therefore, karma is not true from a biblical perspective, which is the view I hold.
But to call that "unbiblical" in really meaningless. It doesn't teach against it, nor does it outright teach it. To say that something that isn't in the Bible is "unbiblical", leads to a sinkhole for you. The "Bible" is "unbiblical too". Nowhere does it list the books you have in your Bible, nor does it ever use the word bible either. Therefore you are unbiblical too.
Point is, whether a Christian believes in this or not, is not a matter of them being false apostate Christians. That's is just ungracious, crude judgmentalism. I'd really suggest spending some time digesting Romans 14 before you start pointing fingers at other Christians like this. I'm pretty sure God doesn't approve of that, long before giving two hoots about things like believing in reincarnation and whatnot.
Last edited: